Semantic and functional features of lexical units in the field of architecture and construction in English and Uzbek


  • Mukhayyo Muydinjanovna Kambarova Tashkent Institute of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Tashkent, Uzbekistan


architectural lexicon, independent segment, lexical-semantic, morphological, poetic, prosaic, semantic relations, suffixation, syntactic


This article is dedicated to the study of one of the historically and more slowly folded boards of modern lexicon and terminology of architecture, which plays a special role in the life of society, both ancient and modern. The architectural term system is also investigated, namely: the processes of deformation, transformation, and the specifics of functioning in the language of poetic texts, i.e. outside the scope of the scientific context. The architectural lexicon is an independent segment in the naive scientific picture of people, speakers of the language, and therefore it is of interest to both linguists and non-specialists in the philological sphere.


Download data is not yet available.


Achkasov V.A. (2005). From the linguistic image to the artistic, 3, 25-29.

Akhmanova, O. S. (1966). Slovar'lingvisticheskikh terminov [Dictionary of linguistic terms]. Moscow, Sovetskaya entsiklopediya publ, 608.

Anisimova A. G. & Fomina I. N. (2006). Problems of semantic derivation and the formation of political terms // Philological sciences, 6, 113-121.

ApalkoI, Y. (2005). Terminological vocabulary of the field of boxing and the dynamics of its development on the material of the Russian and English languages: Author's abstract. dis. ... Cand. philol. sciences. Krasnodar.

Apresyan, Y. D. (2004). Actuality and staticity as secret meanings // Secret meanings: Word. Text. Culture. Sat. articles in honor of N.D. Arutyunova. Moscow.

Arshinov, V. I. (1999). Event and Meaning in Synergetic Dimension. Sobytie i smysl (Sinergeticheskii.

Arutyunova, N. D. (1999). Human Language and World. Moscow: Languages of Russian Culture. Google Scholar.

Babenko L. G. & Kazarin, Y. V. (2005). Linguistic analysis of literary text. Moscow.

Balabanov A. T. (2001). Pragmalinguistic parameters of translation // Language in the world and the world in language: Mat-lymezhd. scientific. conf. Sochi-Karlsruz-Krasnodar.

Beauvillain, C. (1996). The integration of morphological and whole-word form information during eye fixations on prefixed and suffixed words. Journal of memory and Language, 35(6), 801-820.

Chemmel, U., & Phillipe, R. (2018). The role of pragmatics in cross-cultural. Linguistics and Culture Review, 2(1), 45-59.

Golovin, B. N., & Kobrin, R. Y. (1987). Linguistic basis of the doctrine of terms. Moscow: Vishaja shcola.

Hollink, L., Schreiber, G., & Wielinga, B. (2007). Patterns of semantic relations to improve image content search. Journal of Web Semantics, 5(3), 195-203.

Ivina, L. V. (2003). Linguo-Cognitive Bases of Analysis of Branch Termosystems (By the Example of the English Terminology of Venture Financing): Guidance Manual. M.: Akademproekt.

Klimovich, N. V. (2006). About Definition of Biblical Expressions in Linguistics. Journal Of Krasnoyarsk State University. The Humanities, (3), 2.

Leichik, V. M. (2006). Terminology studies. Subhect, methods, structure/VM Leichik.

Lewis, G., Solomyak, O., & Marantz, A. (2011). The neural basis of obligatory decomposition of suffixed words. Brain and language, 118(3), 118-127.

Meunier, F., & Segui, J. (1999). Frequency effects in auditory word recognition: The case of suffixed words. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(3), 327-344.

Mironova, M. R. (2007). Lexical-semantic and linguocultural features of the formation of theatrical lexicon in English and virus languages: Dis ... Krasnodar.

Mishlanova, S. L. (2003). The Cognitive Aspect of Metaphorization in Medical Discourse. Scientific and Technical Terminology, 30-36.

Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (1999). Developmental differences in sensitivity to semantic relations among good and poor comprehenders: Evidence from semantic priming. Cognition, 70(1), B1-B13.

Obleser, J., & Eisner, F. (2009). Pre-lexical abstraction of speech in the auditory cortex. Trends in cognitive sciences, 13(1), 14-19.

Oflazer, K., & Inkelas, S. (2006). The architecture and the implementation of a finite state pronunciation lexicon for Turkish. Computer Speech & Language, 20(1), 80-106.

Peters, P., & Fernández, T. (2013). The lexical needs of ESP students in a professional field. English for specific purposes, 32(4), 236-247.

Popova M. A. (2007). Osemantic aspects of borrowing / Russian language, 6, 53-55.

Rips, L. J., Shoben, E. J., & Smith, E. E. (1973). Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 12(1), 1-20.

Rudinskaya, L. S. (1997). The use of problem and searching method of foreign languages teaching in universities. 230.

Sachs, O., Weis, S., Zellagui, N., Huber, W., Zvyagintsev, M., Mathiak, K., & Kircher, T. (2008). Automatic processing of semantic relations in fMRI: neural activation during semantic priming of taxonomic and thematic categories. Brain research, 1218, 194-205.

Vowel, G. E., Gorray, D. K., & Audrey, N. (2017). Stylistics on the linguistics text applied in a social approach to get a certain goal. Linguistics and Culture Review, 1(1), 38-49.



How to Cite

Kambarova, M. M. (2021). Semantic and functional features of lexical units in the field of architecture and construction in English and Uzbek. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(1), 64-74.



Research Articles