Stylistics on the linguistics text applied in a social approach to get a certain goal

Georgia Elizabeth  Vowel; David Koon  Gorray; Nora  Audrey

doi:10.21744/lingcure.v1n1.4

Authors

Georgia Elizabeth Vowel
vowel.me@saic.edu
School of the Art Institute of Chicago, Illinois, United States
David Koon Gorray School of the Art Institute of Chicago, Illinois, United States
Nora Audrey School of the Art Institute of Chicago, Illinois, United States

Keywords:

community, linguistics, method, social approach, stylistics

Abstract

The stylistics on the linguistics has an important role in the text applied. The social approach is one way how to get a certain goal. In this case, the brilliant solution to solve the problem based on the new method and procedure that can we did. For the public person in the word, the common way can not be avoided a social behavior as well as the community interaction. The current paper explained and explore how it can be done based on a certain way. Of course, the basic concept should be maintained, therefore, in solving the problem those are two principle concept must be had. The first is a success and the second is study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Edelsky, C., Smith, K., & Wolfe, P. (2002). A discourse on academic discourse. Linguistics and Education, 13(1), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(01)00065-1

Argamon, S., Koppel, M., Fine, J., & Shimoni, A. R. (2003). Gender, genre, and writing style in formal written texts. Text-The Hague Then Amsterdam Then Berlin-, 23(3), 321-346. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2003.014

Prior, P. A., & Bazerman, C. (2004). What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices.

Bhatia, K., & Huppi, K. (1993). U.S. Patent No. 5,272,057. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Butler, E. A., Egloff, B., Wlhelm, F. H., Smith, N. C., Erickson, E. A., & Gross, J. J. (2003). The social consequences of expressive suppression. Emotion, 3(1), 48.

Cristianini, N., & Shawe-Taylor, J. (2000). An introduction to support vector machines and other kernel-based learning methods. Cambridge university press.

Shawe-Taylor, J., & Cristianini, N. (2000). Support vector machines. An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods, 93-112.

Firth, J. R., & Strevens, P. D. (1968). The tongues of men and speech.

Firth, J. R. (1968). Descriptive linguistics and the study of English. na.

Flowerdew, J. (2002). Genre in the classroom: A linguistic approach. Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives, 91-102.

Flowerdew, J. (2002). Ethnographically inspired approaches to the study of academic discourse. Academic discourse, 235-252.

Fludernik, M. (2003). The fictions of language and the languages of fiction. Routledge.

Fludernik, M. (1991). Shifters and deixis: Some reflections on Jakobson, Jespersen, and reference. Semiotica, 86(3-4), 193-230.

Fludernik, M. (1993). Second person fiction: Narrative" you" as addressee and/or protagonist. AAA: Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 217-247.

Fludernik, M. (1993). Narratology in Context.

Fludernik, M. (2003). Chronology, time, tense and experientiality in narrative. Language and Literature, 12(2), 117-134.

Gentzler, E. (2001). Contemporary translation theories (Vol. 21). Multilingual Matters.

Gentzler, E. (2012). Translation and identity in the Americas: New directions in translation theory. Routledge.

Halliday, F. (1994). Rethinking international relations. Macmillan International Higher Education.

Halliday, F. (1994). Hidden from international relations: women and the international arena. In Rethinking International Relations (pp. 147-169). Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23658-9_7

Karlgren, J. (2000). Information retrieval: Statistics and linguistics. Excerpt from the PhD Thesis” Stylistic Experiments in Information Retrieval.

Koppel, M., Akiva, N., & Dagan, I. (2003). A corpus-independent feature set for style-based text categorization. In Proceedings of IJCAI’03 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Style Analysis and Synthesis, Acapulco, Mexico (pp. 61-67).

Matthews, C. E., Hebert, J. R., Ockene, I. S., Saperia, G., & Merriam, P. A. (1997). Relationship between leisure-time physical activity and selected dietary variables in the Worcester Area Trial for Counseling in Hyperlipidemia. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 29(9), 1199-1207. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199709000-00013

Matthiessen, C., & Bateman, J. A. (1991). Text generation and systemic-functional linguistics: experiences from English and Japanese. Pinter Publishers.

Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., & Bateman, J. A. (1991). Systemic linguistics and text generation: experiences from Japanese and English. London: Pinter.

Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., & Bateman, J. (1991). Text generation and systemic linguistics: experiences from English and Japanese. London: Pinter.

Matthiessen, C. M. (1983). Nigel: A Systemic Grammar for Text Generation (No. ISI/RR-83-105). University of southern california marina del rey information sciences inst.

Matthiessen, A. (1998). Reduction of divalent mercury by humic substances—kinetic and quantitative aspects. Science of the total environment, 213(1-3), 177-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(98)00090-4

McEnery, A. M., & Oakes, M. P. (2000). Authorship studies/textual statistics.

Oakes, M., & McEnery, T. (2000). Chapter One: Bilingual text alignment-an overview. Language And Computers, 22, 1-37.

Mosteller, F., & Wallace, D. (1964). Inference and disputed authorship: The Federalist.(1964).

O'Donnell, G. (1993). On the state, democratization and some conceptual problems: A Latin American view with glances at some postcommunist countries. World Development, 21(8), 1355-1369. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(93)90048-E

Platt, J. (1998). Sequential minimal optimization: A fast algorithm for training support vector machines.

Robinson, R. G. (1997). Determination of radial coefficient of consolidation by the inflection point method. Geotechnique, 47(5), 1079-1081. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1997.47.5.1079

Sdobnikov, V. V. (2011). Translation strategy: General definition. Vestnik of Irkutsk State Linguistic University, (1), 165-172.

Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (1994). Academic writing for graduate students. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (Vol. 1). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Swales, J. M. (1990). Discourse analysis in professional contexts. Annual review of applied linguistics, 11, 103-114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500001987

Teich, M., Young, R. M., & Needham, J. (1973). Changing Perspectives in the History of Science Essays in Honour of Joseph Needham.

Toury, G. (1995). The Notion of ‘Assumed Translation’-An Invitation to a New Discussion. Letterlijkheid, Woordelijkheid/Literality, Verbality, 135-147.

Tweedie, F. J., Singh, S., & Holmes, D. I. (1996). Neural network applications in stylometry: The Federalist Papers. Computers and the Humanities, 30(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00054024

Venuti, L. (1995). The Translator’s Invisibility. London and New York. Routledge. New York Times “California Seeks to Stop the Use of Child Medical Interpreters, Published: October, 30, 2005.

Von Flotow, L. (2010). Gender in translation. Handbook of Translation Studies, 1, 129-133.

Winograd, T. (1972). Understanding natural language. Cognitive psychology, 3(1), 1-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(72)90002-3

Witten, I. H., & Frank, E. (2000). Weka. Machine Learning Algorithms in Java, 265-320.

Connor, U. (2004). Intercultural rhetoric research: Beyond texts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(4), 291-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.003

De Beaugrande, R., & Dressler, W. U. (1981). Introduction to text linguistics. Routledge.

Mills, S. (2002). Feminist stylistics. Routledge.

Simpson, P. (2003). Language, ideology and point of view. Routledge.

Semino, E., & Short, M. (2004). Corpus stylistics: Speech, writing and thought presentation in a corpus of English writing. Routledge.

Kachru, B. B. (1990). World Englishes and applied linguistics. World Englishes, 9(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1990.tb00683.x

House, J. (2001). Translation quality assessment: Linguistic description versus social evaluation. Meta: journal des traducteurs/Meta: translators' Journal, 46(2), 243-257.

Thorne, S. L. (2008). " Bridging activities," new media literacies, and advanced foreign language proficiency. Calico Journal, 25(3), 558.

Lemke, J. L. (1991). Text production and dynamic text semantics. Functional and systemic linguistics: Approaches and uses, 23.

Short, M. H., & Leech, G. N. (2013). Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. Routledge.

Argamon, S., Whitelaw, C., Chase, P., Hota, S. R., Garg, N., & Levitan, S. (2007). Stylistic text classification using functional lexical features. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(6), 802-822. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20553

Kasper, G. (1990). Linguistic politeness:: Current research issues. Journal of pragmatics, 14(2), 193-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90080-W

Wodak, R. (2002). Aspects of critical discourse analysis. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik, 36(10), 5-31.

Kramsch, C. (2000). Second language acquisition, applied linguistics, and the teaching of foreign languages. The Modern Language Journal, 84(3), 311-326. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00071

Pobegaylov, O. A., Myasishchev, G. I., & Gaybarian, O. E. (2016). Organization and Management Efficiency Assessment in the Aspect of Linguistic Communication and Professional Text. Procedia Engineering, 150, 2173-2177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.260

Bruce, I. (2014). Expressing criticality in the literature review in research article introductions in applied linguistics and psychology. English for Specific Purposes, 36, 85-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.004

Prior, P. (2001). Voices in text, mind, and society: Sociohistoric accounts of discourse acquisition and use. Journal of second language writing, 10(1-2), 55-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00037-0

Kecskes, I. (2000). A cognitive-pragmatic approach to situation-bound utterances. Journal of pragmatics, 32(5), 605-625. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00063-6

Dafouz-Milne, E. (2008). The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse. Journal of pragmatics, 40(1), 95-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.003

Sdobnikov, V. (2016). In defense of communicative-functional approach to translation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 231, 92-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.09.076

Hyland, K. (2016). Methods and methodologies in second language writing research. System, 59, 116-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.05.002

Galbraith, D., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (1999). Effective strategies for the teaching and learning of writing. Learning and instruction, 9(2), 93-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(98)00039-5

Yule, J. A. C. (1944). Unsharp marks. Photographic Journal, 84, 321-327.

Fawcett, R. P., & Tucker, G. H. (1990, August). Demonstration of GENESYS: A very large, semantically based systemic functional generator. In Proceedings of the 13th conference on Computational linguistics-Volume 1 (pp. 47-49). Association for Computational Linguistics.

Bateman, J., Matthiessen, C., Nanri, K., & Zeng, L. (1991, August). The re-use of linguistic resources across languages in multilingual generation components. In Proceedings of the 12th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence-Volume 2 (pp. 966-971). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc..

Bateman, J. A., Matthiessen, C., Nanri, K., & Zeng, L. (1991, August). The rapid prototyping of natural language generation components: an application of functional typology. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on artificial intelligence (pp. 966-971).

De Vel, O. (2000, August). Mining e-mail authorship. In Proc. Workshop on Text Mining, ACM International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’2000).

Argamon, S., Šarić, M., & Stein, S. S. (2003, August). Style mining of electronic messages for multiple authorship discrimination: first results. In Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 475-480). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/956750.956805

Argamon, S., & Levitan, S. (2005, June). Measuring the usefulness of function words for authorship attribution. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACH/ALLC Conference (pp. 4-7).