Philosophical and methodological bases of predicate and sentence interpretation in formal linguistics

Mavjuda M. Bolibekova; Noila A. Abdurakhimova; Adiba S. Toshtemirova; Qobiljon A. Abduqakharov

doi:10.21744/lingcure.v6nS2.2170

Authors

Mavjuda M. Bolibekova
mbolibekova1970@gmail.com
Associate Professor, Ph.D., Faculty of Foreign Philology, National University of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
Noila A. Abdurakhimova Lecturer, Faculty of Foreign Philology, Department of Practical Language and Literature, National University of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
Adiba S. Toshtemirova Lecturer, Faculty of Foreign Philology, Department of Practical Language and Literature, National University of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
Qobiljon A. Abduqakharov Lecturer, Faculty of Foreign Philology, Department of Practical Language and Literature, National University of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Keywords:

formal linguistics, logical units, methodological bases, philosophical bases, sentence interpretation

Abstract

Philosophical and methodological bases of predicate and sentence interpretation in formal linguistics. Now it remains to answer the question of which of these units - logical units or linguistic units - is more scientifically older. Science has already answered this question - linguistics (broader philology) was separated from the structure of philosophy only in the XVIII century, that is, linguistic definitions were copied from philosophy - from logic. This can be proved by another incident. This section of our work can be concluded with the following general conclusion: In Uzbek formal linguistics, the interpretation of the position of the predicate in the sentence structure was given not based on the internal (native, ontological) features of the Uzbek language, but based on the understanding of the predicate in Russian formal linguistics. In formal linguistics itself, the interpretation of the predicate is based on the understanding of the logical predicate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdurahmonov, G., Sulaymonov, A., Kholiyorov, H., Omonturdiev, J. (1979). Modern Uzbek literary language. Syntax. A guide for part-time students of philological faculties of higher educational institutions. Tashkent: Teacher, P. 24; 45-46

Abuzalova, M. Q. (1994). The smallest construction pattern of a simple sentence in Uzbek and its occurrence in speech: Philol. fan. nomz.... diss. avtoref.

Admoni, V. G. (1973). Syntax of the modern German language. System of the relations and system of constructions. L.

Akramov, AK (1997). Textbook "History of Physical Culture and Sports in Uzbekistan". T. T. OzDJTI .

Bickerton, D. (2007). Language evolution: A brief guide for linguists. Lingua, 117(3), 510-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.02.006

Bird, S., & Liberman, M. (2001). A formal framework for linguistic annotation. Speech communication, 33(1-2), 23-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(00)00068-6

Bolibekova, M. M., & Elmuratova, N. ?. (2021). The Structural And Functional Features Of Polysemy In The Process Of Translation In The Uzbek And English Languages. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business & Government, 27(1).

Borris, D. ., & Zecho, C. . (2018). The linguistic politeness having seen on the current study issue. Linguistics and Culture Review, 2(1), 32-44. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v2n1.10

Dmitriev, NK (1956). Category of affiliation. Issledovanija po sravnitel'noj grammatiNe tjurNsNih jazyNov. Chast'II. Morphology.

Duffley, P. (2021). Logical Form–Not logical enough for logic, not linguistic enough for linguistics. Journal of Pragmatics, 182, 163-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.06.019

Hamraeva, H. (2012). Language and style of Ozod Sharafiddinov’s journalism. Tashkent: P.51.

Harris, R. (1993). What is philosophy of linguistics?. Linguistics and Philosophy, 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-041937-4.50006-4

Ivanov, S. N. (1959). Ocherki po sintaksisu uzbekskogo iazyka (forma na-gan i ee proizvodnye)[Essays on the syntax of the Uzbek language (in the form of-gan and its derivatives)]. Leningrad.

Jing, F. (2017). Investigating intentionality of linguistic landscapes from the multilingual commercial signs. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 3(5), 46-52. Retrieved from https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/ijllc/article/view/222

Kar. (1990). “Predication is considered as a function of the “verbal complex” and is identified with “predication” (I.I. Meshchaninov)” Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary. Ch. ed. V.N.Yartsev. – Moscow: SE.- P.393.

Kedrov, BM (1963). Unity of Dialectics, Logic and Theory of Knowledge.

Kononov, A. N. (1960). Grammar of modern Uzbek literary language. M.: Nauka.

Kurbanova, M., Sayfullina, F., & Karimova, Z. (2021). Pragmatic Interpretation of Word-Sentences in Uzbek Language. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 623-632.

Lyons, J. (1968). Introduction to theoretical linguistics (Vol. 510). Cambridge university press.

MacWhinney, B., Bates, E., & Kliegl, R. (1984). Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 23(2), 127-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90093-8

Mahmudov, N., & Nurmonov, A. (1995). Theoretical grammar of the Uzbek language (Syntax). Tashkent: O’qituvchi.

Muhammadjonova, N.I. (2020). INNOVATIVE METHODS IN TEACHING ESP. Problems of Pedagogy , (2), 99-100.

Newmeyer, F. J. (1991). Functional explanation in linguistics and the origins of language. Language & Communication, 11(1-2), 3-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(91)90011-J

Nigmatov, X. (1984). dr. The structure of propositions and current issues syntax of Turkic languages (Thesis of formal-functional research). Soviet Turkology, (5), 5-10.

Nurmonov, A. (2002). History of Uzbek linguistics. Study guide. Tashkent,“Uzbekistan.

Omonturdiev, J. (1988). Typology of parts of speech in modern Uzbek literary language. Tashkent: Teacher.-P.152

Peniro, R. ., & Cyntas, J. . (2019). Applied linguistics theory and application. Linguistics and Culture Review, 3(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v3n1.7

Peshkovsky, A. M. (1956). Russian syntax in scientific coverage. Moscow: Uchpedgiz, 1956.

Qurbonova, M. (2001). Formal-functional direction and interpretation of simple sentence construction in Uzbek language. Filol. Doctor of Science. diss. author.

Rahmatullayev, Sh. (2006). Modern literary Uzbek language (textbook). T.: Universitet.

Raupova, L.(1999). The problem of independent cutting and [WPm-WPm] constructive sentences in Uzbek.

Rischel, J. (1992). Formal linguistics and real speech. Speech Communication, 11(4-5), 379-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6393(92)90043-7

Saidova M. (1996) Comparative and typological study of one-part sentences in Russian and Uzbek languages. Abstract of diss... cand. philol. Sciences - Tashkent: Tashkent State University.

Salton, G., Buckley, C., & Smith, M. (1990). On the application of syntactic methodologies in automatic text analysis. Information Processing & Management, 26(1), 73-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(90)90010-Y

Saydazimova, U. T. (2021). Leading topics and ideas of new Korean poetry of the XX century. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 969-977.

Sayfullaeva, R. (1994). Formal-functional interpretation of compound sentences in modern Uzbek. Tashkent: Fan.

Sayfullayev, R., Mingliyev, B., Bakiyeva, S., Kurbanova, M., Yunusova, Z., & Abuzalova, M. (2009). Modern Uzbek language. Tashkent: Science and Technology.

Schneider, B. (2019). Methodological nationalism in linguistics. Language Sciences, 76, 101169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2018.05.006

Shirinova, N. D. (2017). Personal and Professional Upbringing of Learners by Specific Approach to the learning English. Irrigation and Melioration, 2017(2), 66-69.

Snow. J. (2009) Uzbek language and literature.

Suryasa, I.W., Sudipa, I.N., Puspani, I.A.M., Netra, I.M. (2019). Translation procedure of happy emotion of english into indonesian in k???a text. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(4), 738–746

Turakhanovna, S. U. (2020). The Issue of Literary Heroism in Korean Literature. Solid State Technology, 63(6), 1779-1785.

Udayana, I. N. (2016). Effective sentences in Indonesian. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 2(2), 188-200. Retrieved from https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/ijllc/article/view/106

Usmonov, S. (1972). General linguistics. Tashkent: Teacher.

Van der Lely, H. K. (1996). Specifically language impaired and normally developing children: Verbal passive vs. adjectival passive sentence interpretation. Lingua, 98(4), 243-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(95)00044-5

Voishvillo, EK, & Degtyarev, MG (1998). Logiko-epistemologicheskie aspekty argumentatsii [Logical and Epistemological Aspects of Argumentation]. Moscow: Vlados Publ .

Volf, P. (2020). Translation techniques as a method for describing the results and classifying the types of translation solutions. Applied Translation, 14(2), 1–7. Retrieved from https://appliedtranslation.nyc/index.php/journal/article/view/1171

Ziyamuhamedov, J. T. (2021). Reflection of real life through the bizarre and supernatural in the classic prose of the far east. ACADEMICIA: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 11(1), 1268-1273.

Zvegintsev, V. A. (1985). Pragmatics, semantics and natural language. S" postavitelno ezikoznanie [Comparative Linguistics], 10(5), 39-52.