Development of student competencies in integrated science subjects class VIII based on cognitive technology in the era of society 5.0

Sucia Rahmiwati; Festiyed Festiyed; Ratnawulan Ratnawulan

doi:10.21744/lingcure.v6nS3.2142

Authors

Sucia Rahmiwati
kamsiah35@ymail.com
Doctor Program of Education Science, Universitas Negeri Padang (UNP), Indonesia
Festiyed Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Science, Universitas Negeri Padang (UNP), Indonesia
Ratnawulan Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Science, Universitas Negeri Padang (UNP), Indonesia

Keywords:

cognitive technology, era society 5.0, integrated science, learning material, students skills

Abstract

This research was conducted to 1) produce integrated science learning based on cognitive technology to improve the skills of the 5.0 era student community; 2) know the potential of developing technology-based cognitive learning in integrated science learning; and 3) know the potency of developing in the era of society 5.0. The research method was Research and Development (R & D), pointing to ADDIE models. There were 5 main phases (Analyze, Design, Develop. Implement, Evaluate ) and additional phases (preliminary field testing, main product revision, main field testing, and operational product revision). The instruments used included a product validation questionnaire, problem-solving test, observation sheet of problem-solving, and technology-based cognitive integrated science learning questionnaire. The results showed that: 1) integrated science learning based on technology-based cognitive developed was assessed very good by expert teaching lecturer and teacher, and before suitable for use in the learning process; 2) integrated science learning material technology-based cognitive could improve students’ skills in the era of society 5.0; and 3) integrated science learning technology-based cognitive could improve students’ science attitude.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acedo, C., & Hughes, C. (2014). Principles for learning and competences in the 21 st-century curriculum. Prospects, 44(4), 503-525.

Alam, S. (2019). Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS): Kemampuan Memecahkan Masalah, Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif dalam Pendidikan Seni untuk Menghadapi Revolusi Industri 4.0 pada Era Society 5.0. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana (PROSNAMPAS) (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 790-797).

Ali, M. (2012). Penggunaan media VCD pada senam lantai siswa SLTP di Jambi. Media Ilmu Keolahragaan Indonesia, 2(1).

Allen, M. H., Matthews, C. E., & Parsons, S. A. (2013). A second-grade teacher's adaptive teaching during an integrated science-literacy unit. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 114-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.06.002

Aluko, K. O., & Aluko, R. A. (2008). Strategies for Developing Teachers'Scientific Skills towards a Resourceful Teaching of Primary Science. African Research Review, 2(3), 160-172.

Arfianawati, S., Sudarmin, S., & Sumarni, W. (2016). Model pembelajaran kimia berbasis etnosains untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 21(1), 46-51.

Astra, I. K. B., & Artanayasa, I. W. (2017). Developing instructional material for sepak takraw playing technique course completed with smart audiovisual to improve competencies of the students of sport & health education department ganesha university of education. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT & Scientific Research, 3(4), 66-76. Retrieved from https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/irjeis/article/view/552

Atmojo, S. E. (2012). Profil keterampilan proses sains dan apresiasi siswa terhadap profesi pengrajin tempe dalam pembelajaran ipa berpendekatan etnosains. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 1(2).

Bartoloni, S., Calò, E., Marinelli, L., Pascucci, F., Dezi, L., Carayannis, E., ... & Gregori, G. L. (2021). Towards designing society 5.0 solutions: The new Quintuple Helix-Design Thinking approach to technology. Technovation, 102413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102413

Boslaugh, S., & Watters, P. A. (2008). Statistics in a nutshell . Sebastopol, CA: OReilly Media.

Dansereau, D. F., & Dees, S. M. (2002). Mapping training: The transfer of a cognitive technology for improving counseling. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 22(4), 219-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-5472(02)00235-0

Dinsmore, P. C., & PMP, D. (2014). Team Building and Interpersonal Skills for Dynamic Times. The AMA Handbook of Project Management.

Elfeky, A. I. M., Masadeh, T. S. Y., & Elbyaly, M. Y. H. (2020). Advance organizers in flipped classroom via e-learning management system and the promotion of integrated science process skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100622

Febu, R., Nuswowati, M., & Sumarni, W. (2017, March). Development of Ethnoscience Approach in The Module Theme Substance Additives to Improve the Cognitive Learning Outcome and Student’s entrepreneurship. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 824, No. 1, p. 012024). IOP Publishing.

Fukuda, K. (2020). Science, technology and innovation ecosystem transformation toward society 5.0. International journal of production economics, 220, 107460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.07.033

Fukuyama, M. (2018). Society 5.0: Aiming for a new human-centered society. Japan Spotlight, 1, 47-50.

Gallagher, S. A., Sher, B. T., Stepien, W. J., & Workman, D. (1995). Implementing problem?based learning in science classrooms. School Science and mathematics, 95(3), 136-146.

Gorayska, B., & Marsh, J. (1996). Epistemic technology and relevance analysis: Rethinking cognitive technology. In Advances in Psychology (Vol. 113, pp. 27-39). North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(96)80021-5

Hafil, M. (2019) “Mendikbud Ungkap Cara Hadapi Revolusi 5.0 Di Pendidikan.” REPUBLIKA.Co.Id.

Herreid, C. F. (1998). What makes a good case. Journal of college science teaching, 27(3), 163-169.

Hussin, A. A. (2018). Education 4.0 made simple: Ideas for teaching. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(3), 92-98.

Jackman, H. (2020). The online computer-assisted translation class getting faster target language. Applied Translation, 15(1), 1–9. Retrieved from https://appliedtranslation.nyc/index.php/journal/article/view/1316

Masrukhi. (2012). Membangun Karakter Berbasis Nilai Konservasi. Indonesian Journal of Conservation1(1):20-29 Vol. 1 No. 1 - Juni 2012 [ISSN: 2252-9195]

Mukaddas, A., & Nilufar, D. (2021). The use of interactive methods in teaching professional speech to students. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S2), 1122-1130. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS2.1801

Nagy, K., & Hajrizi, E. (2019). Building pillars for adapting society 5.0 in post-conflict countries. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 52(25), 40-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.12.443

Novitasari, L., Agustina, P. A., Sukesti, R., Nazri, M. F., & Handhika, J. (2017, August). Fisika, etnosains, dan kearifan lokal dalam pembelajaran sains. In Prosiding SNPF (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fisika) (pp. 81-88).

Osman, K., & Marimuthu, N. (2010). Setting new learning targets for the 21st century science education in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3737-3741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.581

Otakhonova, K. (2021). Cognitive principle of foregrounding in the mass-media. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 7(4), 194-200. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v7n4.1649

Piesche, N., Jonkmann, K., Fiege, C., & Keßler, J. U. (2016). CLIL for all? A randomised controlled field experiment with sixth-grade students on the effects of content and language integrated science learning. Learning and Instruction, 44, 108-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.04.001

Pratiwi, S. N., Cari, C., & Aminah, N. S. (2019). Pembelajaran IPA abad 21 dengan literasi sains siswa. Jurnal Materi dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 9(1), 34-42.

Puskur. (2007). Panduan Pengembangan Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu Sekolah Menengah Pertama dan Madrasah Tsanawiyah. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Rahmiwati, S. (2018, April). The Implementation of Integrated Natural Science Textbook of Junior High School be Charged on Character-based Shared Models to Improve the Competence of Learners' Knowledge. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 335, No. 1, p. 012076). IOP Publishing.

Rosana, D. (2012, December). Menggagas Pendidikan IPA yang Baik Terkait Esensial 21st Century Skills. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional IV Pendidikan Sains yang Diselenggarakan Oleh FMIPA UNESA (Vol. 15).

Rosyidah, A. N., Sudarmin, S. S., & Siadi, K. K. (2013). Pengembangan Modul IPA Berbasis Etnosains Zat Aditif dalam Bahan Makanan untuk Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Pegandon Kendal. Unnes Science Education Journal, 2(1).

Shahali, E. H. M., & Halim, L. (2010). Development and validation of a test of integrated science process skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 142-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.127

Sliško, J. (2017). Active physics learning: making possible students’ cognitive growth, positive emotions and amazing creativity. Scientia in educatione, 8.

Soeharto, S., Csapó, B., Sarimanah, E., Dewi, F. I., & Sabri, T. (2019). A review of students’ common misconceptions in science and their diagnostic assessment tools. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(2), 247-266.

Stanley, W. B., & Brickhouse, N. W. (2001). Teaching sciences: The multicultural question revisited. Science Education, 85(1), 35-49.

Subekti, Y., & Ariswan, A. (2016). Pembelajaran fisika dengan metode eksperimen untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar kognitif dan keterampilan proses sains. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 2(2), 252-261.

Sund, R. B., & Trowbridge, L. W. (1967). Teaching Science by Inquiry in the Secondary School, Charles E.

Utami, R. (2020). Integrasi Kurikulum Di Indonesia Dalam Menghadapi Era Society 5.0. PROCEEDING IAIN Batusangkar, 1(3), 213-218.

Vitchenko, A. O., Vitchenko, A. Y., Izhutova, I. V., Aleksandrova, L. G., & Romaniuk, V. L. (2021). Activating the cognitive learning activity through “Dead” case. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S2), 599-607. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS2.1394

Walker, J. T. (2001). The effect of a problem-based learning curriculum on students' perceptions about self-directed learning. The University of Mississippi.

Wibawa, S. (2019). Pendidikan dalam Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Indonesia “7 Provinsi Raih Nilai Terbaik Uji Kompetensi Guru 2015”.

Widana, I.K., Dewi, G.A.O.C., Suryasa, W. (2020). Ergonomics approach to improve student concentration on learning process of professional ethics. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 12(7), 429-445.

Wolfengagen, V., Ismailova, L., & Kosikov, S. (2022). Cognitive technology to capture deep computational concepts with combinators. Cognitive Systems Research, 71, 9-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2021.10.001