Comparison of proximity sensor responsiveness levels on Samsung smartphones
Keywords:
proximity sensor, receiver, responsiveness, Samsung, smartphoneAbstract
Measuring the responsiveness of the proximity sensor on a Samsung smartphone at the Teuku Umar Samsung Service Center has been carried out. The proximity sensor used in smartphones is a photoelectric proximity type with diffusion type, where it works using a light-sensitive element called a receiver. The measuring method is to use a barrier board that is moved closer to the smartphone from a certain distance until the sensor is 1 and measures the distance between these barriers using a ruler or ruler which is then recorded so that the maximum distance of the sensor response is obtained. From the results obtained, it can be explained that every year for the same class it has an increase, although not too significant, whereas if it is reviewed from the class between the lower class series and the upper-class series with the same year, it will have a more significant difference.
Downloads
References
Daponte, P., De Vito, L., Picariello, F., & Riccio, M. (2013). State of the art and future developments of measurement applications on smartphones. Measurement, 46(9), 3291-3307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2013.05.006
Eshankulovna, R. A. (2021). Modern technologies and mobile apps in developing speaking skill. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S2), 1216-1225. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS2.1809
Guido, G., Vitale, A., Astarita, V., Saccomanno, F., Giofré, V. P., & Gallelli, V. (2012). Estimation of safety performance measures from smartphone sensors. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 54, 1095-1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.824
Guntara, R. G., & Ryanjas, A. F., (2016), Development of Cooking Guide Applications Using Proximity Sensors as Air Gesture Features on the Android Platform, Bandung: Informatics Engineering University Computer Indonesia.
He, J., Choi, W., Yang, Y., Lu, J., Wu, X., & Peng, K. (2017). Detection of driver drowsiness using wearable devices: A feasibility study of the proximity sensor. Applied ergonomics, 65, 473-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.02.016
Jackman, H. (2020). The online computer-assisted translation class getting faster target language. Applied Translation, 15(1), 1–9. Retrieved from https://appliedtranslation.nyc/index.php/journal/article/view/1316
Kej?k, P., Kluser, C., Bischofberger, R., & Popovic, R. S. (2004). A low-cost inductive proximity sensor for industrial applications. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 110(1-3), 93-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2003.07.007
Mylonas, A., Meletiadis, V., Mitrou, L., & Gritzalis, D. (2013). Smartphone sensor data as digital evidence. Computers & Security, 38, 51-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2013.03.007
Narváez, F. A. S., & Castro, E. I. M. (2021). Energy planning with renewable energy sources. International Journal of Physical Sciences and Engineering, 5(3), 44-51. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijpse.v5n3.2941
Paziewski, J., Fortunato, M., Mazzoni, A., & Odolinski, R. (2021). An analysis of multi-GNSS observations tracked by recent Android smartphones and smartphone-only relative positioning results. Measurement, 175, 109162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109162
Rinartha, K., Suryasa, W., & Kartika, L. G. S. (2018). Comparative Analysis of String Similarity on Dynamic Query Suggestions. In 2018 Electrical Power, Electronics, Communications, Controls and Informatics Seminar (EECCIS) (pp. 399-404). IEEE.
Sheinker, A., Ginzburg, B., Salomonski, N., Frumkis, L., Kaplan, B. Z., & Moldwin, M. B. (2016). A method for indoor navigation based on magnetic beacons using smartphones and tablets. Measurement, 81, 197-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.12.023
Sianturi, N. M., Nofirman, N., Yulianti, E. B., Fatmawati, E., & Hendriarto, P. (2022). Relevancy technological innovation and community economic development in Indonesia. Linguistics and Culture Review, 6(S3), 117-130. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v6nS3.2091
Stoyanov, H. Y. (2000). Polarization interferometer as a proximity sensor. Optics & Laser Technology, 32(2), 147-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-3992(00)00036-0
Sukarasa, I. K., Adnyana, I. G. A. P., Purnamaimun, I., & Hatimah, H. (2018). Utilization of atmega328 PIR and microcontroller sensors to improve CCTV online performance. International Journal of Physical Sciences and Engineering, 2(3), 23-28. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijpse.v2n3.182
Tehuayo, R., Pranjoto, H., & Gunadhi, A. (2018). Lampu tangga otomatis. Widya Teknik, 13(2), 1-13.
Victores, J. G., Martínez, S., Jardón, A., & Balaguer, C. (2011). Robot-aided tunnel inspection and maintenance system by vision and proximity sensor integration. Automation in Construction, 20(5), 629-636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.12.005
Wu, X., Brown, K. N., & Sreenan, C. J. (2013). Analysis of smartphone user mobility traces for opportunistic data collection in wireless sensor networks. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 9(6), 881-891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2013.07.003
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 Linguistics and Culture Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
