Vietnamese English teachers’ views on formative assessment management and suggestions to improve student motivation

https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v6nS1.2054

Authors

Keywords:

English teachers, formative assessment, student motivation, suggestions, teaching learning

Abstract

Student performance assessments play an important role in the training process. They reflect how well students performed their learning activities. The goals of assessment are multiple according to their functions. Among assessment forms currently applied at higher education institutions, the formative assessment shows its strength over others by offering great contributions to the innovation of teaching and learning activities. Appropriate use of this form of assessment leads to a successful teaching and learning process, and a much better result and quality of training. This paper focuses on the view of formative assessment management from teachers’ lenses in order to help adjust teaching/learning methods and curriculums. To learn more about the reality of formative assessment for English majors and how it is managed by various stakeholders, a questionnaire and interviews were used. The investigation's findings reveal a substantial lack of teacher knowledge of the nature and strengths of formative assessment. These findings also point to new ways to increase student motivation through the use of formative assessment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Absatova, M., Aituarova, A., Ospanbekova, M., Azhgaliyev, M., Uanbayev, E., & Doshybekov, A. (2021). Experimental research of motivational and reflexive components of students’ reading culture. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 670-683. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS1.1451

Ahmed, N., & Teviotdale, W. (2008). Formative assessment in higher education.

Aranda, S., & Yates, P. (2009). An overview of assessment. The National Cancer Nursing Education Project (EdCaN), 2.

Arter, J. (2009). Classroom assessment for student learning (CASL) perspective on the JCSEE student evaluation standards. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, in the Division H symposium JCSEE National Conference on Benchmarking Student Evaluation Practices.

Berryter, V. L. (2019). Translation strategy for nominal phrases: analysis of morphosemantic errors. Applied Translation, 13(2), 24–30. Retrieved from https://appliedtranslation.nyc/index.php/journal/article/view/721

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi delta kappan, 92(1), 81-90.

Bloxham, S., & Boyd, P. (2007). Developing Effective Assessment In Higher Education: A Practical Guide: A Practical Guide. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Bratel, O., Kostiuk, M., Bratel, S., & Okhrimenko, I. (2021). Student-centered online assesment in foreign language classes. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S3), 926-941. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS3.1668

Brookhart, S. M. (2007). Expanding views about formative classroom assessment: A review of the literature. Formative classroom assessment: Theory into practice, 43-62.

Cauley, K. M., & McMillan, J. H. (2010). Formative assessment techniques to support student motivation and achievement. The clearing house: A journal of educational strategies, issues and ideas, 83(1), 1-6.

Clark, I. (2010). Formative assessment:‘There is nothing so practical as a good theory’. Australian Journal of Education, 54(3), 341-352.

Cobeña, G. T. B., García, L. A. P., Pin, S. C. S., & Montes, L. C. Z. (2021). The formative assessment as systematic practice in higher basic education students. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 8(2), 132-140. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v8n2.1100

Crooks, T. (2001, September). The validity of formative assessments. In British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Leeds (pp. 13-15).

Dörnyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. The modern language journal, 78(3), 273-284.

Earl, L., & Katz, S. (2006). Rethinking classroom assessment with purpose in mind. Assessment for learning, assessment as learning, assessment of learning. Western and Northern Canadian Protocol for Collaboration in Education (WNCP).

Ecclestone, K. (2010). Transforming formative assessment in lifelong learning. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Faber, J. M., Luyten, H., & Visscher, A. J. (2017). The effects of a digital formative assessment tool on mathematics achievement and student motivation: Results of a randomized experiment. Computers & education, 106, 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.001

Filisetti, L., & Wentzel, K. (2006). Social motivation and learning: issues related to students' social goals. B. Galand, & E. Bourgeois (dir.) , 75-84.

Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & education, 57(4), 2333-2351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.004

Guasch, T., Alvarez, I., & Espasa, A. (2010). University teacher competencies in a virtual teaching/learning environment: Analysis of a teacher training experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 199-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.018

Hang, P. D. T., Nam, N. H., & Da Nang City, V. N. (2018). Formative assessment in E-learning: Role and experience for implementing information technology trainee teacher training in Vietnam.

Khanh, N. C. (2018). The Education Assessment Capacity Structure of Primary Teachers in Vietnam. VNU Journal of Science: Education Research, 34(4).

Laight, J., Asghar, M., & Aslett-Bentley, A. (2010). Investigating conceptions and practice of formative assessment in higher education. Literacy information and computer education journal, 1(3), 192-199.

Lieury, A., & Fenouillet, F. (2013). Motivation and academic success-3rd edition . Dunod.

Mahendra, I. W. E. (2016). Contextual learning approach and performance assessment in mathematics learning. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 3(3), 7-15. Retrieved from https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/irjmis/article/view/347

Montalbetti, K. (2018). Assessment for learning in higher education.

Nguyen, V. B. H., Vu, T. M. H., Hoang, T. K. H., & Nguyen, T. M. N. (2020). Vietnamese education system and teacher training: Focusing on science education. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 6(1), 179-206.

Perrenoud, P. (1998). From formative evaluation to a controlled regulation of learning processes. Towards a wider conceptual field. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 85-102.

Qu, W., & Zhang, C. (2013). The analysis of summative assessment and formative assessment and their roles in college English assessment system. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(2), 335.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

Suryasa, I.W., Sudipa, I.N., Puspani, I.A.M., Netra, I.M. (2019). Translation procedure of happy emotion of english into indonesian in k???a text. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(4), 738–746

Tapingkae, P., Panjaburee, P., Hwang, G. J., & Srisawasdi, N. (2020). Effects of a formative assessment-based contextual gaming approach on students’ digital citizenship behaviours, learning motivations, and perceptions. Computers & Education, 159, 103998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103998

Timmers, C. F., Braber-Van Den Broek, J., & Van Den Berg, S. M. (2013). Motivational beliefs, student effort, and feedback behaviour in computer-based formative assessment. Computers & education, 60(1), 25-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.007

van der Kleij, F. M. (2019). Comparison of teacher and student perceptions of formative assessment feedback practices and association with individual student characteristics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85, 175-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.06.010

Wilson, J., & Czik, A. (2016). Automated essay evaluation software in English Language Arts classrooms: Effects on teacher feedback, student motivation, and writing quality. Computers & Education, 100, 94-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.004

Xiao, Y., & Yang, M. (2019). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: How formative assessment supports students' self-regulation in English language learning. System, 81, 39-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.01.004

Xie, Q., & Cui, Y. (2021). Preservice teachers’ implementation of formative assessment in English writing class: Mentoring matters. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 101019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101019

Yorke, M. (1998). The management of assessment in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(2), 101-116.

Published

2021-12-29

How to Cite

Hai, N. V. (2021). Vietnamese English teachers’ views on formative assessment management and suggestions to improve student motivation. Linguistics and Culture Review, 6(S1), 363-379. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v6nS1.2054

Issue

Section

Research Articles