Linguistic document research technologies (forensic and procedural aspects)


  • Iryna Petrova National Scientific Center “Hon. Prof. M. S. Bokarius Forensic Science Institute”, Kharkiv, Ukraine
  • Viktor Sezonov Kharkiv Scientific Research Forensic Center of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine
  • Stanislav Perlin Kharkiv Scientific Research Forensic Center of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine
  • Olga Sezonova Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, Kharkiv, Ukraine
  • Alina Piddybna Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, Kharkiv, Ukraine


document examination, expert technology, forensic evaluation, linguistic examination, procedural


Linguistic examination is a modern type of forensic examination, which is directly related to the study of the products of speech activity in order to establish facts (circumstances) of evidentiary significance in a particular (criminal, civil and administrative) case. Although linguistic knowledge is often useful, author identification has not yet reached a significant level of reliability. The main purpose of the study is to investigate the current state of legal regulation of document linguistic examination in Ukraine and to disclose the criminal and procedural aspects of linguistic technologies of document examination. The research process involved using a combination of general scientific, philosophical and specialised scientific methods, which are in line with the aims and objectives set by the authors. The philosophical basis of the methodological paradigm of the study is the dialectic as a philosophical learning method. The author's conclusion provided a conceptual understanding of the implementation of document linguistic examination in Ukraine.


Download data is not yet available.


Ahmed, H. R. (2021). The Role of Forensic Linguistics in Crime Investigation: Uses in Legal Proceedings. ANGLISTICUM. Journal of the Association-Institute for English Language and American Studies, 10(2), 23-31.

Ahmed, H., & Arcelus-Ulibarrena, J. M. (2021). The role of forensic linguistics in understanding legal documents in court proceedings: Controversies and future perspectives. Electronic Research Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(II).

Ariani, M. G., Sajedi, F., & Sajedi, M. (2014). Forensic linguistics: A brief overview of the key elements. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 158, 222-225.

Bataille, M., Crainic, K., Leterreux, M., Durigon, M., & de Mazancourt, P. (1999). Multiplex amplification of mitochondrial DNA for human and species identification in forensic evaluation. Forensic science international, 99(3), 165-170.

Biedermann, A., Taroni, F., Bozza, S., & Mazzella, W. D. (2011). Implementing statistical learning methods through Bayesian networks (Part 2): Bayesian evaluations for results of black toner analyses in forensic document examination. Forensic science international, 204(1-3), 58-66.

Bogoslavska, M. O. (2020). Current issues of modern linguistic examination. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminology: Materials of the III All-Ukrainian Scientific-Practical Conference.

Chang, C. W., Wu, C. R., & Chen, H. C. (2008). Using expert technology to select unstable slicing machine to control wafer slicing quality via fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(3), 2210-2220.

Coulthard, M., Johnson, A., & Wright, D. (2016). An introduction to forensic linguistics: Language in evidence. Routledge.

Gabidullina, A., Sokolova, A., Kolesnichenko, E., Zharikova, M., & Shlapakov, O. (2021). Metonymy in scientific linguistic discourse. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S4), 71-83.

Goloborodko, K. (2020). Linguistic examination of the text: Legal and linguistic analysis. Ukrainian World in Scientific Paradigms: Collection of Scientific Works of H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University. Kharkiv: HIFT.

Gow Jr, D. W., & Im, A. M. (2004). A cross-linguistic examination of assimilation context effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(2), 279-296.

Grant, T., & MacLeod, N. (2018). Resources and constraints in linguistic identity performance–a theory of authorship. Language and Law/Linguagem e Direito, 5(1), 80-96.

Houtman, H., & Suryati, S. (2018). The History of Forensic Linguistics as an Assisting Tool in the Analysis of Legal Terms. Sriwijaya Law Review, 2(2), 215-232.

Ionova, S. V. (2017). Aspects of the study of the written text as an object of linguistic expertise. VolSU Bulletin. Series 2, Linguistics, 16(2), 28-38.

Kalamaiko, A. (2016). Electronic means of proof in civil proceedings.

Khomenko, A. Yu. (2019). Linguistic attributional study of short written texts: qualitative and quantitative methods. Political Linguistics, 2(74).

Korma, V. D. (2017). Scientific foundations of criminology. Moscow: Prospekt.

Koutchadé, I. S., Datondji, A. C., & Salami, A. (2018). Exploring textual meaning in Chukwuemeka Ike’s Sunset at Dawn: a systemic functional approach. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 5(1), 1-11.

Leonard, R. A., Ford, J. E. R., & Christensen, T. K. (2017). Forensic linguistics: Applying the science of linguistics to issues of the law. Hofstra Law Review, 45(3), Article number 11.

Machado, T. J., Vieira Filho, J., & de Oliveira, M. A. (2019). Forensic speaker verification using ordinary least squares. Sensors, 19(20), 4385.

Madea, B., & Preuß, J. (2009). Medical malpractice as reflected by the forensic evaluation of 4450 autopsies. Forensic science international, 190(1-3), 58-66.

Meluzzi, C., Cenceschi, S., & Trivillini, A. (2020). Data in forensic phonetics from theory to practice. TEANGA, the Journal of the Irish Association for Applied Linguistics, 27, 65-78.

Najam-Us-Sahar. (2020). A critical forensic linguistic analysis of media discourse on court decisions in Pakistan: thesis for the degree of master of philosophy. Islamabad: International Islamic University Islamabad.

Nikishin, V. D. (2018). The place of forensic examination of materials of a religious nature of extremist-terrorist orientation in the classification of forensic examinations. Journal of the OE Kutafin University, 7/2018, 187-198.

Ordoñez, J., Soto, R. R., & Chen, B. Y. (2020). Will longformers PAN out for authorship verification. Working Notes of CLEF.

Peniro, R. ., & Cyntas, J. . (2019). Applied linguistics theory and application. Linguistics and Culture Review, 3(1), 1-13.

Pfeffferli, P. W. (1983). Application of microspectrophotometry in document examination. Forensic science international, 23(2-3), 129-136.

Seyari, A., & Bagheri, M. S. (2019). Perspectives of Forensic Linguistics Research in Iran. Journal of Language Horizons, 3(1), 187-205.

Shcherbakovsky, M. G. (2015). Conducting and using forensic examinations in criminal proceedings. Kharkiv: V dele.

Shcherbakovskyi, M. H. (2013). Conditions for the formation of a reliable expert report. Theory and practice of forensic science and criminalistics. Kharkiv: Pravo.

Sokolova-Vysochyna, Ya. A. (2018). Appointment of linguistic examination of speech in the investigation of crimes against the foundations of national security of Ukraine. In: O. G. Ruvin (Ed.), Current issues of standardization of forensic justice in Ukraine. Development prospects: Materials of the international scientific-practical conference, dedicated 105th anniversary of forensic examination in Ukraine and 95th anniversary of the birth of Academician M. Ya. Segai. Kyiv: Kyiv Scientific Research Institute of Forensic Expertise of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine.

Sousa-Silva, R. (2019). Computational forensic linguistics: an overview of computational applications in forensic contexts. Language and Law/Linguagem e Direito, 5(2), 118-143.

Suryasa, W. (2019). Historical Religion Dynamics: Phenomenon in Bali Island. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 11(6), 1679-1685.

Syam, S. K. M. A. (2018). Aspects of forensic linguistics in policing. Language in India, 18, 100-111.

Ullman, M. T. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92(1-2), 231-270.

Ullman, M. T., & Pierpont, E. I. (2005). Specific language impairment is not specific to language: The procedural deficit hypothesis. Cortex, 41(3), 399-433.

Umiyati, M. (2020). A Literature Review of Forensic Linguistics. IJFL (International Journal of Forensic Linguistic), 1(1), 23-29.

Waxman, S. R., Senghas, A., & Benveniste, S. (1997). A cross-linguistic examination of the noun-category bias: Its existence and specificity in French-and Spanish-speaking preschool-aged children. Cognitive Psychology, 32(3), 183-218.

Wen, W. (2010). An intelligent traffic management expert system with RFID technology. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(4), 3024-3035.

Yaroshchuk, I. A., Zhukova, N. A., & Dolzhenko, N. I. (2020). Linguistic examination. Belgorod: BelGU Publishing House, BelSU Research Institute.

Yin, W., & Zubiaga, A. (2021). Towards generalisable hate speech detection: a review on obstacles and solutions. PeerJ Computer Science, 7, e598.

Yunusova, S. M. (2021). Paraphrases related to the language of advertising. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 7(4), 236-240.



How to Cite

Petrova, I., Sezonov, V., Perlin, S., Sezonova, O., & Piddybna, A. (2021). Linguistic document research technologies (forensic and procedural aspects). Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S4), 1464-1482.



Research Articles