Artificial intelligence in justice


  • Oleksandra O. Karmaza Academician F.H. Burchak Scientific Research Institute of Private Law and Entrepreneurship of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Sergii O. Koroied King Danylо University, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
  • Vitalii M. Makhinchuk Academician F.H. Burchak Scientific Research Institute of Private Law and Entrepreneurship of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Valentyna Yu. Strilko Prosecutor General’s Office, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Solomiia T. Iosypenko Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Kyiv, Ukraine


artificial intelligence, corporate disputes, court, digital protocol, electronic evidence, electronic justice, court proceedings language, legal proceedings


The relevance of this study is condition upon the necessity of an in-depth investigation of the phenomenon of artificial intelligence, including its use in the judicial system of various legal states and its impact on the entire judicial system of the state. In this regard, the present paper aims to cover the main definitions of the concept of artificial intelligence, its origins, characteristics, grounds for application, as well as direct interaction and influence on the implementation of the main tasks of justice through the use and development of artificial intelligence in the judicial procedure. The leading method of this study is dialectical, although the authors also employ a combination of other different methods of scientific cognition. The dialectical method, which underlies the theoretical work and is directly listed as fundamental, allowed thoroughly analysing the nature of the concept of artificial intelligence, its key advantages and disadvantages, by analysing its use in the legal systems of the world's leading states. This paper investigates the emergence and transformation of artificial intelligence in modern technological and information relations, its gradual introduction in various spheres of life, namely the ways of implementation and the possibility of application in justice.


Download data is not yet available.


Adinkrah, M. (2021). Representations of mortuary beliefs and practices in Akan literary works: a focus on Edwin Efa’s forosie. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 7(6), 477-488.

Aletras, N., Tsarapatsanis, D., Preot?iuc-Pietro, D., & Lampos, V. (2018). Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: A natural language processing perspective. PeerJ Computer Science, 2, e93.

Back, C., Gustafsson, P. A., Larsson, I., & Berterö, C. (2011). Managing the legal proceedings: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of sexually abused children's experience with the legal process. Child abuse & neglect, 35(1), 50-57.

Bench-Capon, T. J., & Dunne, P. E. (2007). Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Artificial intelligence, 171(10-15), 619-641.

Buocz, T. J. (2018). Artificial intelligence in court: Legitimacy problems of AI assistance in the judiciary. Retskraft – Copenhagen Journal of Legal Studies, 2(1), 41-59.

De Hert, P., Parlar, C., & Sajfert, J. (2018). The Cybercrime Convention Committee's 2017 Guidance Note on Production Orders: Unilateralist transborder access to electronic evidence promoted via soft law. Computer law & security review, 34(2), 327-336.

Frühwirt, P., Kieseberg, P., Krombholz, K., & Weippl, E. (2014). Towards a forensic-aware database solution: Using a secured database replication protocol and transaction management for digital investigations. Digital Investigation, 11(4), 336-348.

Fu, J. R., Ju, P. H., & Hsu, C. W. (2015). Understanding why consumers engage in electronic word-of-mouth communication: Perspectives from theory of planned behavior and justice theory. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 14(6), 616-630.

Furashev, S. O. (2018). Internet of things: Problems of legal regulation and implementation. Kyiv: Polytechnic Publishing House.

Gaivoronskaya, Y. V., Mamychev, A. Y., Miroshnichenko, O. I., & Nor, O. K.-. (2021). Logical and conceptual constructions, theoretical and legal versions of the interpretation of the artificial intelligence’s "legal personality". Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S3), 1124-1138.

Goldfarb, A., Trefler, D. (2018). AI and international trade. Cambridge: National Bureai of Economic Research.

Gulson, B., Korsch, M., Winchester, W., Devenish, M., Hobbs, T., Main, C., ... & Crisp, M. (2012). Successful application of lead isotopes in source apportionment, legal proceedings, remediation and monitoring. Environmental research, 112, 100-110.

Henle, C. A., Kohut, G., & Booth, R. (2009). Designing electronic use policies to enhance employee perceptions of fairness and to reduce cyberloafing: An empirical test of justice theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 902-910.

Kaharuddin, K. (2021). Assessing the effect of using artificial intelligence on the writing skill of Indonesian learners of English. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(1), 288-304.

Larina, O. S., & Ovchinsky, V. S. (2020). Artificial intelligence. Ethics and law. Moscow: Knizhnyi? mir.

Lomakin, N. I., & Samorodova, I. A. (2017). Digital economy with artificial intelligence. Advances in Science and Technology: Collection of Articles Based on the Results of the IX International Scientific and Practical Conference, 2017, 254-257.

Matveev, M. G., Sviridov, A. S., & Aleinikova, N. A. (2008). Artificial intelligence models and methods. Application in economics. Moscow: Publishing House “Finansy i Statistika”.

Miller, T. (2019). Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. Artificial intelligence, 267, 1-38.

Nesbitt, J. (2017). Ways artificial intelligence is transforming trade.

Pittman, K. (2016). Infographic: A brief history of collaborative robots.

Ponkin, I. V., & Redkina, A. I. (2018). Artificial intelligence from the point of view of law. Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: Legal Sciences, 22(1), 91-109.

Shemshuchenko V. (2018). Artificial intelligence in justice.

Suryasa, W. (2019). Historical Religion Dynamics: Phenomenon in Bali Island. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 11(6), 1679-1685.

Suwija, I. N. (2016). A study on educational value of national character towards Balinese traditional song text: Geguritan Ketut Bungkling. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 2(3), 133-143.

Wang, X. Y., & Gao, Y. F. (2010). A switch-modulated method for chaos digital secure communication based on user-defined protocol. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 15(1), 99-104.

Wu, H., & Zheng, G. (2020). Electronic evidence in the blockchain era: New rules on authenticity and integrity. Computer Law & Security Review, 36, 105401.

Zakirov, R. F. (2018). The use of modern IT-technologies as a means to achieve the main objectives of the judiciary. Bulletin of the Civil Process, 2(1), 211-219.



How to Cite

Karmaza, O. O., Koroied, S. O., Makhinchuk, V. M., Strilko, V. Y., & Iosypenko, S. T. (2021). Artificial intelligence in justice. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S4), 1413-1425.



Research Articles