Structural and contextual model of a concept
Keywords:
cognitive aspect, communicative personality, lingual, political culture, term, verbalizationAbstract
The central notion of the cognitive linguistics “concept” has been defined in a number of ways thus the authors suggest the unique way to treat its structure and content. The article provides the interpretation variability of a concept taking into account two approaches – lingual and cultural and semantic and cognitive one which construct cognitive and discourse vector lying in the dimension of both cognition and communication. Whereas the content of a concept is carried out via multidimensional (thinking and speaking in the first place) activity of a person the work considers its structure (imaginary, notional, axiological and adorative (secret) components being in a harmonious unity with the structure of a communicative personality (pragmatic-motivational, cognitive, verbal-semantic, transcendental levels). Concept is a coherent ethnic and mental unit possessing complex four-level structure. It implies interaction and interrelation between a concept and communicative personality, their two-side hierarchical connection particularly using spiritual halo. The following research methods were used in the work: observation, induction and deduction, analysis and synthesis, modelling method, which are necessary for the objective scientific definition of the subject in question; cognitive and discourse analysis. The article provides stratification of a concept in connection with the structure of communicative personality.
Downloads
References
Alefirenko, N. F. (2005). Controversial problems of semantics [Spornye problemy semantiki].
Bagan, O. (2008). Philosopher-war.
Batsevich, F. (1997). The divine-human nature of language in the concept of Alexander Potebnya. Notes of the Shevchenko Scientific Society, ??????V, 297-303.
Bilodid, I. K. (1971). Glossary of the Ukrainian language in 11 volumes. Volume 2. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka.
Bondarko, A. V. (1978). Grammatical Meaning and Significanse. AV Bondarko–L.: Nauka.
Derkach, S., Melnyk, M., Fisher, V., Krypchuk, M., & Chystiakov, O. (2021). Development of students’ communicative culture in the context of artistic practices. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S4), 1070-1084. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS4.1747
Faye, P., Brémaud, D., Daubin, M. D., Courcoux, P., Giboreau, A., & Nicod, H. (2004). Perceptive free sorting and verbalization tasks with naive subjects: an alternative to descriptive mappings. Food quality and preference, 15(7-8), 781-791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.04.009
Franko, I. (1991). Collection of works. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka.
Golovin, B. N. (1987). Lingvisticheskie osnovy ucheniya o terminakh [Linguistic foundations of the doctrine of terms]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola.
Heidegger, M. (2007). By a Road to the Language. Litopys, Lviv.
Hoc, J. M., & Leplat, J. (1983). Evaluation of different modalities of verbalization in a sorting task. International journal of man-machine studies, 18(3), 283-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(83)80011-X
Ilyin, I. A. (1993). The path of spiritual renewal. The path to evidence. Moscow: Respublika.
Ivashchenko, V. (2006). Kontseptual'na reprezentatsiya frahmentiv znannya v naukovo-mystets' kiy kartyni svitu (na materiali ukrayins' koyi mystetstvoznavchoyi terminolohiyi): Monohrafiya (The Conceptual Representation of Fragments of the Knowledge in the Scientific and Artistic Picture of the World (Based on the Ukrainian Art Studies Terminology): The Monograph). Kyiv: Vydavnychyy Dim Dmytra Buraho.
Karasik, V. I., & Sternin, I. A. (2008). “Anthology of concepts” as an attempt to create a linguistic and conceptological encyclopedia. Lingvoconceptology, 1, 33-39.
Karaulov, Y. N. (1987). Russian language and language personality. Science, Moscow.
Kashkin, V. B. (2007). Communication Theory Basics. AST: Vostok-Zapad, Moscow.
Kim, M. H., Kim, Y. S., Lee, H. S., & Park, J. A. (2007). An underlying cognitive aspect of design creativity: Limited Commitment Mode control strategy. Design Studies, 28(6), 585-604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2007.04.006
Kostenko, L. (1989). I use a violin clef. Kyiv: Dnipro.
Kubryakova, E. S. (2004). On the installations of cognitive science and actual problems of cognitive linguistics. Issues of cognitive linguistics, (1), 6-17.
Lee, P. C. B. (2000). Turnover of information technology professionals: a contextual model. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 10(2), 101-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8022(99)00016-8
Licorish, S. A., & MacDonell, S. G. (2015). Communication and personality profiles of global software developers. Information and Software Technology, 64, 113-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.02.004
Lloyd, P., Lawson, B., & Scott, P. (1995). Can concurrent verbalization reveal design cognition?. Design Studies, 16(2), 237-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(94)00011-2
Macintosh, N. B. (1981). A contextual model of information systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 6(1), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(81)90021-0
Marseille, G. (1999). Homo viator. Kyiv: Academiya.
Maturana, U. (1995). Biology of cognition [Biologiya poznaniya]. Yazyk i intellekt.–M.
Nalimov, V. V. (2003). Verojatnostnaja model’jazyka: o sootnoshenii jestestvennykh i iskusstvennykh jazykov [A probabilistic model of language: about the correlation of natural and artificial languages]. Tomsk-M.: Vodolej Publishers.
Nikitin, M. F. (1988). The fundamentals of linguistic theory of meaning. M.: Higher School.
Pimenova, M. V. (2004). Soul and spirit: features of conceptualization. Kemerovo: KSU.
Pitt, L. F., Opoku, R., Hultman, M., Abratt, R., & Spyropoulou, S. (2007). What I say about myself: Communication of brand personality by African countries. Tourism Management, 28(3), 835-844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2006.06.003
Popova, Z. D., & Sternin, I. A. (2007). Cognitive Linguistics. Moscow: AST: Vostok—Zapad.
Potebnya, A. A. (1993). Thought and language. Kiev: Nauka [in Russian].
Ramos, R. I. A., Mata, R. R. M., & Nacar, R. C. (2021). Mediating effect of ethical climate on the relationship of personality types and employees mindfulness. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 1480-1494. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS1.1722
Reformatsky, A. A. (1969). What is the term and terminology. Moscow: Nauka.
Rinartha, K., Suryasa, W., & Kartika, L. G. S. (2018). Comparative Analysis of String Similarity on Dynamic Query Suggestions. In 2018 Electrical Power, Electronics, Communications, Controls and Informatics Seminar (EECCIS) (pp. 399-404). IEEE.
Schunk, D. H. (1986). Verbalization and children's self-regulated learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11(4), 347-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(86)90030-5
Setyastrini, N. L. P., Subekti, I., & Prastiwi, A. (2021). Corporate governance and political connection towards the tax aggressiveness of manufacturing companies in Indonesia. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 8(1), 102-109. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v8n1.1118
Stepanov, O. M. (2006). Psychological encyclopedia, Kyiv, Akademvydav.
Suputra, I. D. G. D. ., & Widhiyani , N. L. S. . (2020). Types of personality, audit structure and transformational leadership styles moderate the effect of organizational commitments on auditor performance . International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 7(6), 54-65. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v7n6.1005
Ufimtseva, M. V. (2005). Power and authority in the linguistic consciousness of Russians. Russian Language in a Multicultural World: Collection of Scientific Articles of the III International Symposium, 11, 12-21.
Vamat, T., & Madarulzaman, S. (2020). Translation of imperative sentences and its mistakes: strategy analysis in pragmatic studies. Applied Translation, 14(1), 23–28. Retrieved from https://appliedtranslation.nyc/index.php/journal/article/view/1099
Vereshchagin, E. M., & Kostomarov, V. G. (2005). Yazyk i kul'tura [Language and Culture]. Moscow: Indrik Publ. 1040 p.
Vezhbitskaya, A. (1992). The semantics of grammar. Moscow: Yazyky russkoy kultury.
Vinokur, G. O. (1939). On some phenomena of word formation in Russian technical terminology. Proceedings of the Moscow Institute of History, Philosophy and Literature, 3-54.
Zhaivoronok, V. V. (2006). Znaky ukrainskoi etnokultury: slovnyk-dovidnyk [Signs of Ukrainian ethnoculture: dictionary-reference book]. Kyiv: Dovira.
Zourbanos, N., Tzioumakis, Y., Araújo, D., Kalaroglou, S., Hatzigeorgiadis, A., Papaioannou, A., & Theodorakis, Y. (2015). The intricacies of verbalizations, gestures, and game outcome using sequential analysis. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 18, 32-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.12.003
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2021 Linguistics and Culture Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
