Axiological density of the linguocultural concept

https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v5n1.1519

Authors

  • Alla Bondarenko Department of Ukrainian Language and Teaching Methodology, Nizhyn Mykola Gogol State University, Nyzhin, Ukraine
  • Tetiana Semashko Department of Journalism and Language Communication, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Oksana Moroz Ukrainian Philology Department, Mariupol State Universit, Mariupol, Ukraine

Keywords:

associative-semantic field of concept, axiological density of linguocultural concept, concept, domain, linguocultural studies, linguoculture, stereotype

Abstract

The article is devoted to determining the factors of axiological features of cognitive forms. The main approaches related to the evaluation specification of linguistic and cultural concepts (structural and semantic) are outlined and analyzed. It is explained that the structural features of the linguo-cultural concept (historical and actual layers, domains and modular parts, nuclear and near-nuclear zone) determine its axiological features. The structure of the representation of knowledge is evaluative specified by the characteristics of its name (internal form, in equivalence, denotation and connotation, etc.). It is argued that the axiological characteristics of the concept are determined by external factors: belonging to one or different cultures, a particular subculture, the amount of collective historical, subjective emotional, and concrete-sensory experience, position on other concepts, rooted in the system of background knowledge, carrier mentality, stereotypes, as well as subjects of material and spiritual culture, etc. The term “axiological density of linguistic and cultural concept” was introduced into scientific circulation and an algorithm for its definition was proposed with the help of an integrative approach. Based on this algorithm, the modal (axiological) component of the linguistic and cultural concept of “time” in the poetic discourse of the 20th-21st centuries is analyzed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alefirenko, N. F. (2010). Linguoculturology: value-semantic space of language. M.: Flint: Science.

Askoldov, S. A. (1997). Kontsept i slovo [The concept and the word]. Russkaia slovesnost. Ot teorii slovesnosti k strukture teksta. Antolohiia—Russian literature. From the theory of literature to the structure of the text. Anthology].

Aveni, A. F. (1989). Empires of time: Calendars, clocks, and cultures. New York: Basic Books.

Ben-Zeev, T., Fein, S., & Inzlicht, M. (2005). Arousal and stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(2), 174-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2003.11.007

Bilonozhenko, V. M. (1999). Phraseological dictionary of the Ukrainian language in 2 volumes. K.: Naukova Dumka.

Bondarenko, A. (2015). Integrative approach to analysis of temporality markers in Ukranian poetry of the 20th century. Austrian Journal of Humanities and Social Science.Vienna: East vest, 3–4(1), 59–63.

Bondarenko, A. I. (2018). Figurative semantics of the temporality of Ukrainian poetic texts of the twentieth century in the integrative dimension. PhD Dissertation, Kyiv.

Bondarenko, A., & Bondarenko, Y. (2020). The role of linguocultural studies in the training of future philologists as researchers. Yearbook of Varna universityof Management: International scientific conference “The science and digitalisation in help of business, education and tourism”, 13, 305–312.

Butenko, N. P. (1979). Slovnyk asotsiatyvnykh norm ukrainskoi movy [Dictionary of Associative Norms in Ukrainian Language]. Lviv:“Vyshcha shkola”[in Ukrainian].

Cap, P. (2010). Axiological aspects of proximization. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(2), 392-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.06.008

Cheremisina, G. O. (2021). Objectification of the linguistic and cultural concept of WEALTH by innovative units in the American language picture of the world: author's brief of PhD dissertation, Zaporozhye.

Drobishevska, U. (2012). The concept of “happiness” in Ukrainian and Polish phraseology. Ethnos and culture: journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University: collection of scientific and theoretical articles.

Fan, L. (2001). A new approach to quantitative domain theory. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 45, 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1571-0661(04)80956-3

Fiske, S. T. (2015). Intergroup biases: A focus on stereotype content. Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 3, 45-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.01.010

Garaeva, A. (2014). The development of linguocultural competence of students in teaching the history of the English language. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 1012-1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.359

Golovastchuk, S. I. (1980). Dictionary of the Ukrainian language: in 11 volumes. Volume 11. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka.

Grabarova, E. B. (2004). The concept of savoir vivre in French linguistic culture and its Russian correspondences: author's ref. Dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Sciences, Volgograd.

Ilieva, D. I. (2012). The core of the concept of “power” and its nuclear zone with the adjacent concept of “submission” through the prism of the Bulgarian paremias. International scientific conference “Word. Text. Time – XII”. Phraseology in the idiolect and system of Slavic languages.

Issa, S. H. M., Bajiri, M. E., Alyamani, K. A. Z., & Abhishek B. P. (2021). Lexical semantic activation in bilinguals: evidence through blocked naming task. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 860-866. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v5nS1.1470

Ivashchenko, V. (2006). ????????????? ????????????? ?????????? ?????? ? ???????-?????????? ??????? ?????/Conceptual representation of fragments of knowledge in to scientifically artistic to the world picture.

Karasik, V. I. (2002). Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse. Volgograd: Peremena, 477.

Kazimagomedova, A. A. (2016). Lexico-semantic and Linguo-cultural content of the concept “Khinkal” in the Dagestani languages: author's brief of PhD dissertation, Makhachkala.

Kazymyr, I. I. (2007). The concept of BIRDS in the linguistic picture of the Ukrainian world people: author's brief of PhD dissertation, Kharkiv.

Kovalchuk, L. P. (2009). Linguo-cultural features of the concept “Woman” – “Frau” in Russian and German phraseology. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk National University. Chelyabinsk: Izd-vo ChGU, 38, 93–96.

Lewis Jr, N. A., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2016). Beyond test performance: A broader view of stereotype threat. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 40-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.002

Loginova, P. G. (2017). Linguistic manifestation of the linguo-cultural concept of “wine”: phraseological aspect (on the material of French, Italian, Spanish, English and Russian languages): author's brief of PhD dissertation. Moscow.

Markova, O. I., & Maslennikova, V. V. (2018). Value of territories connected with Moscow in 2012 and opportunities of their optimization for sustainable development. ????????????????? ??????????? ??????????? ???????? ??????????, 87.

Maslova, V. A. (2008). Cognitive linguistics: a textbook. Minsk: TetraSystems.

Muminova, A. A. (2021). Linguistic incentive category: definition and classification: example of different systematic languages. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S3), 97-103. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v5nS3.1396

Schmidt-Schauß, M., & Smolka, G. (1991). Attributive concept descriptions with complements. Artificial intelligence, 48(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(91)90078-X

Selivanova, O. O. (2017). Conceptual Modelling And Cognitive Onomasiological Analyze. Cherkasy University Bulletin: Philological Sciences, (2).

Slyshkin, G. G. (2004). Linguocultural concepts and metaconcepts. Volgograd: Peremena.

Spitzer, M., Braun, U., Hermle, L., & Maier, S. (1993). Associative semantic network dysfunction in thought-disordered schizophrenic patients: direct evidence from indirect semantic priming. Biological Psychiatry, 34(12), 864-877. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3223(93)90054-H

Sukalenko, T. M. (2010). Metaforychne vyrazhennya kontseptu zhinka v ukrayinskiy movi [Metaphorical expression of the concept woman in the Ukrainian language].

Vandenberghe, R., Wang, Y., Nelissen, N., Vandenbulcke, M., Dhollander, T., Sunaert, S., & Dupont, P. (2013). The associative-semantic network for words and pictures: effective connectivity and graph analysis. Brain and language, 127(2), 264-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.09.005

Vezhbitskaya, A. (1997). Language. The culture. Cognition. Moscow, Russian dictionaries.

Zerkina, N., Lomakina, Y., & Kostina, N. (2015). Axiological linguistics and foreign language teaching. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 254-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.514

Published

2021-10-13

How to Cite

Bondarenko, A., Semashko, T., & Moroz, O. (2021). Axiological density of the linguocultural concept. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(1), 272-287. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v5n1.1519

Issue

Section

Research Articles