The nature of liberty

https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS2.1455

Authors

  • Nguyen Anh Quoc Faculty of Philosophy, The University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
  • Nguyen Minh Tri Politics and National Defense Education Center, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HUTECH), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
  • Nguyen Trinh Nghieu Faculty of Philosophy, The University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
  • Pham Thi Dinh Faculty of Philosophy, The University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
  • Dinh Van Chien Faculty of Philosophy, The University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
  • Dinh The Hoang Faculty of Philosophy, The University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Keywords:

behavior, body, individual, irresponsibility, liberty, necessity, need, norm, responsibility

Abstract

Liberty, and necessity are the premise for the perception of the relationship between man and nature. When objects exist in nature, individuals exist in people. Nature and man are a unity between the body and the individual in behavior. The successive act of liberty to fill the temporal gaps in the exercise of the right to life and the pursuit of happiness is the object of human science. Liberty is in itself, due to it, but depending on historical circumstances and conditions, liberty depends on different objects, knowledge, and needs of individuals, making behavior about necessity become liberty about responsibility. Individuals are acts of knowledge, with a will, and liberty is acts of intelligence and reason. When private ownership comes into being, liberty about the property becomes liberty about norms. Organizations become a means of subsistence that makes standards false. To submit to falsehoods in the course of living is a slave. The abolition of slaves is the subject of liberty. In the condition that there is no more antagonistic division of labor, diversity of occupations, an abundance of sexual orientation, and false standards are fully discovered, work and gender are equally noble and equal. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adam, A., & Filippaios, F. (2007). Foreign direct investment and civil liberties: A new perspective. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(4), 1038-1052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2006.08.006

Bahrudin, B., Ritonga, M., Maseleno, A., Huda, M., & Ibrahim, M. H. (2021). Social learning for understanding planning practices at the individual level. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 284-292.

BenYishay, A., & Betancourt, R. (2014). Unbundling democracy: Political rights and civil liberties. Journal of Comparative Economics, 42(3), 552-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2014.06.001

Brandberg, A. ., & Amzel, I. A. . (2017). Culture value on community life behavior of the phonetic and phonology. Linguistics and Culture Review, 1(1), 13-25.

Felkenes, G. T. (1992). Liberty, restraint, and criminal justice: Gerald Ford's presidential concerns. Journal of Criminal Justice, 20(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(92)90005-T

La Fond, J. Q. (2008). Sexually violent predator laws and the liberal state: An ominous threat to individual liberty. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 31(2), 158-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2008.02.005

Lewandowsky, S. (2021). Liberty and the pursuit of science denial. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 42, 65-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.02.024

Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1993). Complete volume, vol 8. Hanoi: National politics.

Marx, K., & Engels, F. (2020). Complete volume, vol 42. Hanoi: National politics.

Nam, T. (2017). A tool for liberty or oppression? A cross-national study of the Internet’s influence on democracy. Telematics and Informatics, 34(5), 538-549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.11.004

Nikolaev, B., & Bennett, D. L. (2016). Give me liberty and give me control: Economic freedom, control perceptions and the paradox of choice. European Journal of Political Economy, 45, 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2015.12.002

QUOC, D., CHIEN, D., & VIET, D. (2021). The Nature of State. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 27(2), 5204-5215.

Quoc, N. A. (2018). Human issues in Karl Marx’s Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844. European Journal of Social Sciences Studies.

Quoc, N. A. (2019). A discussion about personal alienation. Journal of the Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences, ISSN, 1013-4328.

Quoc, N. A. (2019). Karl Marx’s theory of human nature. European Journal of Social Sciences Studies.

Quoc, N. A., & Tri, N. M. (2020). Money with perfecting human. International Journal of Education Humanities and Social Science.

Quoc, N. A., & Tri, N. M. (2020). Nature of Religion. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention.

Quoc, N. A., Thuong, N. A., & ThiThuyDuyen, N. (2021). The Spirtual Goods. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(6), 4867-4879.

Quoc, N. A., Tri, N. M., & Dung, N. T. (2020). The Nature of Power. London Journal of Research Humanities and Social Sciences, Print ISSN, 2515-5784.

Quoc, N. A., Tri, N. M., Lam, N. M., & Dung, N. T. (2021). The consistency between the truth and deception during humans’ development process. Psychology and Education Journal, 58(3), 1216-1226.

Quoc, N. A., Tri, N. M., Lam, N. M., & Dung, N. T. (2021). The consistency between the truth and deception during humans’ development process. Psychology and Education Journal, 58(3), 1216-1226.

Quoc, N. A., Tri, N. M., Nghieu, N. T., Lam, N. M., & Cuong, T. M. (2021). Exclusive Spiritual Goods. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 18(08), 2568-2584.

Rindermann, H. (2008). Relevance of education and intelligence for the political development of nations: Democracy, rule of law and political liberty. Intelligence, 36(4), 306-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2007.09.003

Scofield, G. R. (1991). Privacy (or liberty) and assisted suicide. Journal of pain and symptom management, 6(5), 280-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-3924(91)90051-5

Sen, A. (1991). Welfare, preference and freedom. Journal of econometrics, 50(1-2), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(91)90087-T

Strong, G. A. (1968). Liberty, religion, and fluoridation. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 76(6), 1398-1409. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1968.0204

Published

2021-09-07

How to Cite

Quoc, N. A., Tri, N. M., Nghieu, N. T., Dinh, P. T., Chien, D. V., & Hoang, D. T. (2021). The nature of liberty. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S2), 831-847. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS2.1455

Issue

Section

Research Articles