Development of humanities education in the context of interdisciplinary approach and informatization

https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS2.1392

Authors

  • Yuriy S. Kravtsov Dniprovsk State Technical University, Kamenskoe, Ukraine
  • Mariia P. Oleksiuk Taras Shevchenko Regional Humanitarian-Pedagogical Academy of Kremenets, Kremenets, Ukraine
  • Ihor M. Halahan Taras Shevchenko Regional Humanitarian-Pedagogical Academy of Kremenets, Kremenets, Ukraine
  • Viktoriia B. Lehin Taras Shevchenko Regional Humanitarian-Pedagogical Academy of Kremenets, Kremenets, Ukraine
  • Tetiana A. Balbus Taras Shevchenko Regional Humanitarian-Pedagogical Academy of Kremenets, Kremenets, Ukraine

Keywords:

globalization, global Network, cultural self-determination, information technology, cyberspace

Abstract

The phenomenon of globalization is directly connected to the emergence of the global Network. National and political diversity in cyberspace fades into the background. Authenticity, self-identification of a person becomes secondary. The society determines the immersion of the individual in the virtual space and its functioning in this space. The transformation and development of humanities education is determined by the processes of informatization. The development of humanities education involves the implementation of the principle of openness of humanities education to social practices and the principle of its accessibility without age and geographical location. The introduction of info-telecommunications accelerates the creation of a single information space, provides access to the information resources. The development of humanities education is aimed at implementing an interdisciplinary approach that ensures the effectiveness of the development and application of humanitarian knowledge and form a conscious responsible choice in a variety of cultural meanings, cultural self-determination. It ensures the rigor and accuracy of the methodological and technical side of humanities education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bekh, T. (2005). Philosophical analysis of the origin of the levels of higher education. Vyshcha Osv?ta v Ukraini, 3, 13-19.

Berdyaev, N. (1994). Philosophy of creativity, culture and art. Vol. 1. Moscow: Iskusstvo.

Bocheliuk, V. Y., Nechyporenko, V. V., Pozdniakova-Kyrbiatieva, E. H., Pozdniakova, O. L., & Siliavina, Y. S. (2021). Psychological and pedagogical aspects of consolidation of social capital of higher education institutions. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S2), 342-353. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v5nS2.1357

Coulson, N. S., Buchanan, H., & Aubeeluck, A. (2007). Social support in cyberspace: a content analysis of communication within a Huntington's disease online support group. Patient education and counseling, 68(2), 173-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2007.06.002

Habermas, J. (2000). Moral consciousness and communicative action. St. Petersburg. Science.

Jowett, S., Adie, J. W., Bartholomew, K. J., Yang, S. X., Gustafsson, H., & Lopez-Jiménez, A. (2017). Motivational processes in the coach-athlete relationship: A multi-cultural self-determination approach. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 32, 143-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.06.004

Kim, Y. Y. (2008). Intercultural personhood: Globalization and a way of being. International journal of intercultural relations, 32(4), 359-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2008.04.005

Mun, Y. Y., Jackson, J. D., Park, J. S., & Probst, J. C. (2006). Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: Toward an integrative view. Information & Management, 43(3), 350-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.08.006

Oltmans, S. J., & Levy II, H. (1994). Surface ozone measurements from a global network. Atmospheric Environment, 28(1), 9-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(94)90019-1

Pakhomova, T. O., Komova, O. S., Belia, V. V., Yivzhenko, Y. V., & Demidko, E. V. (2021). Transformation of the pedagogical process in higher education during the quarantine. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S2), 215-230. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v5nS2.1341

Radin, P. (2006). “To me, it's my life”: medical communication, trust, and activism in cyberspace. Social Science & Medicine, 62(3), 591-601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.06.022

Sher, P. J., & Lee, V. C. (2004). Information technology as a facilitator for enhancing dynamic capabilities through knowledge management. Information & management, 41(8), 933-945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.06.004

Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2010). A theoretical upgrade of the concept of parental psychological control: Proposing new insights on the basis of self-determination theory. Developmental Review, 30(1), 74-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.11.001

Yick, J., Mukherjee, B., & Ghosal, D. (2008). Wireless sensor network survey. Computer networks, 52(12), 2292-2330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2008.04.002

Young, O. R., Berkhout, F., Gallopin, G. C., Janssen, M. A., Ostrom, E., & Van der Leeuw, S. (2006). The globalization of socio-ecological systems: an agenda for scientific research. Global environmental change, 16(3), 304-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.004

Zhižek, S. (2002). Welcome to the desert of real. Moscow: Pragmatika kultury.

Zhuk, M. (2006). Modern higher education in a competitive information flow.

Published

2021-08-01

How to Cite

Kravtsov, Y. S., Oleksiuk, M. P., Halahan, I. M., Lehin, V. B., & Balbus, T. A. (2021). Development of humanities education in the context of interdisciplinary approach and informatization. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S2), 580-587. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS2.1392