The role of pragmatics in cross-cultural
Keywords:
communication, context, cross-culture, pragmatics, situationAbstract
We here try to find out the role of pragmatics in the cross-cultural contexts. Pragmatics is the way we convey meaning through communication (Deda, 2013). Other factors beyond competence are the adjustments between contexts and situations that can change the ordinary meaning of elements/sentences according to the language situation. The culture of an organization decides the way employees behave amongst themselves as well as the people outside the organization. Pragmatic culture more emphasis is placed on the clients and the external parties. Customer satisfaction is the main motive of the employees in a pragmatic culture. In linguistics, pragmatic competence is the ability to use language effectively in a contextually appropriate fashion. Pragmatic competence is a fundamental aspect of a more general communicative competence.
Downloads
References
Andreasen, A. R., & Best, A. (1977). Consumers complain-does business respond. Harvard Business Review, 55(4), 93-101.
Andreasen, N. C., Endicott, J., Spitzer, R. L., & Winokur, G. (1977). The family history method using diagnostic criteria: reliability and validity. Archives of general psychiatry, 34(10), 1229-1235. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1977.01770220111013
Bach, K. (1987). Thought and reference.
Bach, K. (1994). Conversational impliciture. Mind & language, 9(2), 124-162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.1994.tb00220.x
Bach, K., & Harnish, R. M. (1979). Linguistic communication and speech acts.
Bambini, V., Bertini, C., Schaeken, W., Stella, A., & Di Russo, F. (2016). Disentangling metaphor from context: an ERP study. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 559. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00559
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Griffin, R. (2005). L2 pragmatic awareness: Evidence from the ESL classroom. System, 33(3), 401-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.06.004
Barner, D., Brooks, N., & Bale, A. (2011). Accessing the unsaid: The role of scalar alternatives in children’s pragmatic inference. Cognition, 118(1), 84-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.010
Bernicot, J., Salazar-Orvig, A., & Veneziano, E. (2006). Les reprises: dialogue, formes, fonctions et ontogenèse. La linguistique, 42(2), 29-49.Bertolo, 2001;
Bibby, H., & McDonald, S. (2005). Theory of mind after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia, 43(1), 99-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.04.027
Bosco, F. M., Bono, A., & Bara, B. G. (2012). Recognition and repair of communicative failures: the interaction between theory of mind and cognitive complexity in schizophrenic patients. Journal of Communication Disorders, 45(3), 181-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2012.01.005
Bosco, F. M., Parola, A., Sacco, K., Zettin, M., & Angeleri, R. (2017). Communicative-pragmatic disorders in traumatic brain injury: The role of theory of mind and executive functions. Brain and language, 168, 73-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2017.01.007
Breheny, R., Katsos, N., & Williams, J. (2006). Are generalised scalar implicatures generated by default? An on-line investigation into the role of context in generating pragmatic inferences. Cognition, 100(3), 434-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.07.003
Brem, S. K. (2003). Structure and pragmatics in informal argument: Circularity and question-begging. Trends in cognitive sciences, 7(4), 147-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00026-3
Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1996). Analisis wacana. Penerbit PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Brüne, M., & Bodenstein, L. (2005). Proverb comprehension reconsidered—‘theory of mind’and the pragmatic use of language in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia research, 75(2-3), 233-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2004.11.006
Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2001). Diagnosis and change in organizational culture. SPb. y dr.: Pyter, 320.
Carston, R. (1988). Language and cognition. Linguistics: the Cambridge survey, 3, 38-68.
Carston, R. (1993). Conjunction, explanation and relevance.
Champagne-Lavau, M., & Stip, E. (2010). Pragmatic and executive dysfunction in schizophrenia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 23(3), 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2009.08.009
Chan, K. K., & Mak, W. W. (2012). Shared decision making in the recovery of people with schizophrenia: The role of metacognitive capacities in insight and pragmatic language use. Clinical Psychology Review, 32(6), 535-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.06.001
Channon, S., & Watts, M. (2003). Pragmatic language interpretation after closed head injury: Relationship to executive functioning. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 8(4), 243-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/135468000344000002
Chomsky, N. (1980). On binding. Linguistic inquiry, 11(1), 1-46.
Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. Behavioral and brain sciences, 3(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00001515
Chomsky, N. (1995). Categories and transformations. The minimalist program, 219, 394.
Chomsky, N. (1995). Language and nature. Mind, 104(413), 1-61.
Chomsky, N. (1995). Necessary illusions: Thought control in democratic societies. House of Anansi.
Chouinard, M. M., & Clark, E. V. (2003). Adult reformulations of child errors as negative evidence. Journal of child language, 30(3), 637-669. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000903005701
Clark, E. V., & Chouinard, M. M. (2000). Enoncés enfantins et reformulations adultes dans l'acquisition du langage. Langages, 9-23.
Cummings, J., Mintzer, J., Brodaty, H., Sano, M., Banerjee, S., Devanand, D. P., ... & Peskind, E. (2015). Agitation in cognitive disorders: International Psychogeriatric Association provisional consensus clinical and research definition. International Psychogeriatrics, 27(1), 7-17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610214001963
Cummings, S. R., Martin, J. S., McClung, M. R., Siris, E. S., Eastell, R., Reid, I. R., ... & Kutilek, S. (2009). Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. New England Journal of Medicine, 361(8), 756-765. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0809493
Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2014). Organization development and change. Cengage learning.
Cummings, W. K. (2014). Education and equality in Japan (Vol. 869). Princeton University Press.
Cutting, J. (2012). English for airport ground staff. English for specific purposes, 31(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.06.002
Deda, N. (2013). The role of Pragmatics in English language teaching. Pragmatic competence. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(4), 63. http://dx.doi.org/10.5901/ajis.2012.v2n4p63
Demetras, M. J., Post, K. N., & Snow, C. E. (1986). Feedback to first language learners: The role of repetitions and clarification questions. Journal of child language, 13(2), 275-292. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900008059
Docherty, N. M., DeRosa, M., & Andreasen, N. C. (1996). Communication disturbances in schizophrenia and mania. Archives of General Psychiatry, 53(4), 358-364.
Douglas, J. M., O'Flaherty, C. A., & Snow, P. C. (2000). Measuring perception of communicative ability: The development and evaluation of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire. Aphasiology, 14(3), 251-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/026870300401469
Douglas, S. J. (2010). Enlightened sexism: The seductive message that feminism's work is done (p. 279). New York: Times Books.
Engel, A. K., Maye, A., Kurthen, M., & König, P. (2013). Where's the action? The pragmatic turn in cognitive science. Trends in cognitive sciences, 17(5), 202-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.006
Frith, C. D., & Allen, H. A. (1988). Language disorders in schizophrenia and their implications for neuropsychology.
Gallaway, C., & Richards, B. J. (Eds.). (1994). Input and interaction in language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
Gazdar, G. (1980). A cross-categorial semantics for coordination. Linguistics and Philosophy, 3(3), 407-409.
Geraci, A., Surian, L., Ferraro, M., & Cantagallo, A. (2010). Theory of Mind in patients with ventromedial or dorsolateral prefrontal lesions following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 24(7-8), 978-987. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2010.487477
Gernsbacher, M. A., & Robertson, R. R. (1999). The role of suppression in figurative language comprehension. Journal of pragmatics, 31(12), 1619-1630. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00007-7
Gibbs Jr, R. W., & Moise, J. F. (1997). Pragmatics in understanding what is said. Cognition, 62(1), 51-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00724-X
Gibbs, R. W., & Beitel, D. (1995). What proverb understanding reveals about how people think. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 133.
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press on Demand.
Goldberg, D. E. (2006). Genetic algorithms. Pearson Education India.
Goldstein, K., & Scheerer, M. (1941). Abstract and concrete behavior an experimental study with special tests. Psychological monographs, 53(2), i.
Gorham, E. (1974). The relationship between standing crop in sedge meadows and summer temperature. The Journal of Ecology, 487-491.
Grice, H. P., Cole, P., & Morgan, J. (1975). Logic and conversation. 1975, 41-58.
Gunraj, D. N., Drumm-Hewitt, A. M., Dashow, E. M., Upadhyay, S. S. N., & Klin, C. M. (2016). Texting insincerely: The role of the period in text messaging. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1067-1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.003
Hansen, M. B. M., & Visconti, J. (2009). On the diachrony of “reinforced” negation in French and Italian. Grammaticalization and pragmatics: Facts, approaches, theoretical issues, 137-171.
Happé, F., & Loth, E. (2002). ‘Theory of mind’and tracking speakers’ intentions. Mind & Language, 17(1‐2), 24-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00187
Happé, F., Brownell, H., & Winner, E. (1999). Acquiredtheory of mind'impairments following stroke. Cognition, 70(3), 211-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00005-0
Havet-Thomassin, Allain, Etcharry-Bouyx, & Le Gall, 2006;
Huang, Y. (2004). 13 Anaphora and the Pragmatics–Syntax Interface. The handbook of pragmatics, 288.
Hymes, D. (1974). Ways of speaking. Explorations in the ethnography of speaking, 1(1974), 433-451.
Keenan, J. M., MacWhinney, B., & Mayhew, D. (1977). Pragmatics in memory: A study of natural conversation. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 16(5), 549-560. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80018-2
Kilani-Schoch, M., Balčiunienė, I., Korecky-Kröll, K., Laaha, S., & Dressler, W. U. (2009). On the role of pragmatics in child-directed speech for the acquisition of verb morphology. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(2), 219-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.001
Kim, C., Quinn, R., & Quinn, R. E. (2001). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture.
Krause, D. R. (1999). The antecedents of buying firms' efforts to improve suppliers. Journal of operations management, 17(2), 205-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00038-2
Langdon, R., Coltheart, M., Ward, P. B., & Catts, S. V. (2002). Disturbed communication in schizophrenia: the role of poor pragmatics and poor mind-reading. Psychological medicine, 32(7), 1273-1284. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291702006396
Larrivée, P. (2011). The role of pragmatics in grammatical change: The case of French preverbal non. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(7), 1987-1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.12.012
Levinson, B. M., & Mallon, G. P. (1997). Pet-oriented child psychotherapy. Charles C. Thomas Publisher.
Levinson, S. E., Rabiner, L. R., & Sondhi, M. M. (1983). An introduction to the application of the theory of probabilistic functions of a Markov process to automatic speech recognition. Bell System Technical Journal, 62(4), 1035-1074. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1983.tb03114.x
MacPherson, H. (2004). Pragmatic clinical trials. Complementary therapies in medicine, 12(2-3), 136-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2004.07.043
MacWhinney, B. (2004). A multiple process solution to the logical problem of language acquisition. Journal of child language, 31(4), 883-914. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000904006336
Malinowski, B. (1923). Psycho-analysis and anthropology. Nature, 112(2818), 650. https://doi.org/10.1038/112650a0
Martin, I., & McDonald, S. (2003). Weak coherence, no theory of mind, or executive dysfunction? Solving the puzzle of pragmatic language disorders. Brain and language, 85(3), 451-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00070-1
Martín-Rodríguez, JF, & León-Carrión, J. (2010). Theory of mind deficits in patients with acquired brain injury: A quantitative review. Neuropsychologia , 48 (5), 1181-1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.02.009
Matsumoto, Y. (1990). The role of pragmatics in Japanese relative clause constructions. Lingua, 82(2-3), 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(90)90059-T
McDonald, R. P. (2014). Factor analysis and related methods. Psychology Press.
McDonald, S., & Pearce, S. (1998). Requests that overcome listener reluctance: Impairment associated with executive dysfunction in brain injury. Brain and Language, 61(1), 88-104. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1997.1846
McLeod, S., Roberts, A., & Sita, J. (2006). Tongue/palate contact for the production of/s/and/z. Clinical linguistics & phonetics, 20(1), 51-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200400021331
Mey, J. L., & Xu, C. (2001). Pragmatics: an introduction.
Milders, M., Ietswaart, M., Crawford, J. R., & Currie, D. (2006). Impairments in theory of mind shortly after traumatic brain injury and at 1-year follow-up. Neuropsychology, 20(4), 400. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0894-4105.20.4.400
Miyake, Y. M. (2000). The Japanese" deferential" prefix o: A natural history.
Müller, M., Freitag, B., & Köder, F. (2010). Plant biotechnology in German media: a linguistic analysis of the public image of genetically modified organisms. The public image of agricultural biotechnology in German print media. Biotechnology Journal, 5(6), 541-544.
Munang, R., Thiaw, I., Alverson, K., Mumba, M., Liu, J., & Rivington, M. (2013). Climate change and Ecosystem-based Adaptation: a new pragmatic approach to buffering climate change impacts. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(1), 67-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.12.001
Myers-Scotton, C. (2000). Explaining the role of norms and rationality in codeswitching. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(9), 1259-1271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00099-5
O’Driscoll, J. (2013). The role of language in interpersonal pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 58, 170-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.008
Ochs, E. (1993). Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective. Research on language and social interaction, 26(3), 287-306. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2603_3
Ohta, A. S. (2005). Interlanguage pragmatics in the zone of proximal development. System, 33(3), 503-517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.06.001
Orvig, AS (2000). The resumption at the sources of discursive construction. Languages , 68-91.
Pan, H., & Lee, P. (2004). The role of pragmatics in interpreting the Chinese perfective markers-guo and-le. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(3), 441-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.07.003
Perkins, M. R. (2014). Linguistic recycling in typical and atypical interaction. Clinical linguistics & phonetics, 28(7-8), 590-601.
Perrin, D. (2013). The linguistics of newswriting (Vol. 11). John Benjamins Publishing.
Piazza, R. (2002). The pragmatics of conducive questions in academic discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(5), 509-527. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00038-8
Preissler, M. A., & Carey, S. (2005). The role of inferences about referential intent in word learning: Evidence from autism. Cognition, 97(1), B13-B23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.008
Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?. Behavioral and brain sciences, 1(4), 515-526. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00076512
Recanati, F. (1989). Referential/attributive: A contextualist proposal. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 56(3), 217-249.
Recanati, F. (1989). The pragmatics of what is said. Mind & Language, 4(4), 295-329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.1989.tb00258.x
Recanati, F. (1993). Direct reference: From language to thought.
Richards, B. J. (1994). Child-directed speech and influences on language acquisition: Methodology and interpretation.
Richards, B. J., & Gallaway, C. (1994). Conclusions and directions. Input and interaction in language acquisition, 253-269.
Rose, K. R. (2005). On the effects of instruction in second language pragmatics. System, 33(3), 385-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.06.003
Saxton, G. D., & Benson, M. A. (2005). Social capital and the growth of the nonprofit sector. Social Science Quarterly, 86(1), 16-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00288.x
Saxton, M. (2000). Negative evidence and negative feedback: Immediate effects on the grammaticality of child speech. First Language, 20(60), 221-252. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F014272370002006001
Saxton, M., Backley, P., & Gallaway, C. (2005). Negative input for grammatical errors: Effects after a lag of 12 weeks. Journal of child language, 32(3), 643-672. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000905006999
Schiffrin, D. (2006). From linguistic reference to social reality. Studies in Interactional sociolinguistics, 23, 103.
Schwenter, S. A. (2006). Fine-tuning Jespersen’s cycle. Drawing the boundaries of meaning: Neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn, 327-344.
Schwenter, S. A. (2006). Null objects across South America. In Selected proceedings of the 8th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 23-36). Cascadilla Proceedings Project Somerville, MA.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition (Vol. 142). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Spikman, Timmerman, Milders, Veenstra, & van der Naalt, 2012),
Stemmer, W. P., & Lipshutz, R. J. (1999). U.S. Patent No. 5,928,905. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Strobbe, I., & Jacobs, G. (2005). E-releases: A view from linguistic pragmatics. Public Relations Review, 31(2), 289-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.02.009
Thomas, W., Tsuchihashi, Z., Ruddy, D. A., Basava, A., ... & Hinton, L. M. (1996). A novel MHC class I–like gene is mutated in patients with hereditary haemochromatosis. Nature genetics, 13(4), 399.
Tirassa, M., Bosco, F. M., & Colle, L. (2006). Rethinking the ontogeny of mindreading. Consciousness and Cognition, 15(1), 197-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2005.06.005
Trillo, J. R. (2002). The pragmatic fossilization of discourse markers in non-native speakers of English. Journal of pragmatics, 34(6), 769-784. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00022-X
Van Dijk, T. A. (1979). Pragmatic connectives. Journal of pragmatics, 3(5), 447-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(79)90019-5
Van Hoecke, E., Baeyens, D., Vanden Bossche, H., Hoebeke, P., & Vande Walle, J. (2007). Early detection of psychological problems in a population of children with enuresis: construction and validation of the Short Screening Instrument for Psychological Problems in Enuresis. The Journal of urology, 178(6), 2611-2615.
Veneziano, G. (1999). Pre-bangian origin of our entropy and time arrow. Physics Letters B, 454(1-2), 22-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00267-1
Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding pragmatics.
Weck, D. (2000). Investigation of the anti‐allergic activity of azelastine on the immediate and late‐phase reactions to allergens and histamine using telethermography. Clinical & Experimental Allergy, 30(2), 283-287. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2222.2000.00724.x
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (1998). Pragmatics and time. Pragmatics and Beyond New Series, 1-22.
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2002). Relevance theory.
Yuang, X., Stemmler, H., & Barbi, I. (2001). Self-balancing of the clamping-capacitor-voltages in the multilevel capacitor-clamping-inverter under sub-harmonic PWM modulation. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 16(2), 256-263. https://doi.org/10.1109/63.911150
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. New York.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2018 Linguistics and Culture Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.