Information and communication activity of students when writing a course work on linguistics

https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v5n1.1062

Authors

  • Valeria Koroliova Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine
  • Viktoriia Grechenko Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine
  • Mykola Kovalchuk Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine
  • Valeriia Samoilenko Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine
  • Tetiana Shevchenko Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine
  • Viktoriia Zaitseva Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine

Keywords:

information culture, language behavior, language corpus, learning foreign languages, linguistic competencies, linguistic disciplines, linguistic portals, linguistic research, youth slang

Abstract

The experience of using information space in the process of students’ work over a course paper in linguistics has been examined in the article. The importance of information and communication technologies in this type of educational activity is determined. There are three levels of students’ information and communication activities depending on the development of the students’ information competence and the involvement of information and communication technologies as the main and auxiliary resources for writing a course paper. Adaptive, productive and creative levels of information and communication activities are highlighted. The type of the above-mentioned student actively engages various online platforms for surveys, classifications and processing of the source base of research, etc. It is stressed that information resources are mostly used at the preparatory stage and less in the final one. The need to create a single information base of linguistic resources has been emphasized.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Gahtani, S. S., Hubona, G. S., & Wang, J. (2007). Information technology (IT) in Saudi Arabia: Culture and the acceptance and use of IT. Information & management, 44(8), 681-691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.09.002

Bykov, V. Y., & Mushka, I. V. (2009). Electronic Pedagogics and Modern Instruments of the Open Education. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 13(5).

Cheng, W., Warren, M., & Xun-Feng, X. (2003). The language learner as language researcher: Putting corpus linguistics on the timetable. System, 31(2), 173-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00019-8

Chistyakova, G., Bondareva, E., Demidenko, K., Podgornaya, E., & Kadnikova, O. (2017). Using innovative interactive technologies for forming linguistic competence in global mining education. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 15, p. 04010). EDP Sciences.

Conrad, S. M. (1999). The importance of corpus-based research for language teachers. System, 27(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(98)00046-3

Djiwandono, P. I. (2019). How language teachers perceive information and communication technology. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(3), 607-615.

Ginsburgh, V., Ortuño-Ortín, I., & Weber, S. (2007). Learning foreign languages: Theoretical and empirical implications of the Selten and Pool model. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 64(3-4), 337-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2006.10.005

Gumperz, J. J., & Tannen, D. (1979). Individual and social differences in language use. In Individual differences in language ability and language behavior (pp. 305-325). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-255950-1.50024-X

Hartono, H., Suparto, S., & Hassan, A. (2021). Language: a ‘mirror’ of the culture and its application English language teaching. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(1), 93-103. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v5n1.835

Horbatiuk, L. V., Kravchenko, N. V., Alieksieieva, H. M., & Rozumna, T. S. (2019). Mobilni dodatky yak zasoby formuvannia inshomovnoi leksychnoi kompetentnosti studentiv nefilolohichnykh spetsialnostei [Mobile applications as a means of forming foreign-language lexical competence of students of non-philological specialties]. Information technology and training tools, (6), 150-164.

Horwitz, E. K. (1995). Student affective reactions and the teaching and learning of foreign languages. International Journal of Educational Research, 23(7), 573-579. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(96)80437-X

Kennewell, S. (2006). Researching the influence of interactive presentation tools on teachers' pedagogy.

Koval, T. I. (2009). Training of higher school teachers: information technologies in pedagogical activity.

Madrid, M. N. R. (2006). The ICT and applied linguistics: An integrative perspective for the L2 language learning process. RAEL: revista electrónica de lingüística aplicada, (5), 173-198.

Martinsons, M. G., & Westwood, R. I. (1997). Management information systems in the Chinese business culture: An explanatory theory. Information & Management, 32(5), 215-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(96)00009-2

Mathew, S. (2012). Implementation of cloud computing in education-A Revolution. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering, 4(3), 473.

Mishra, G. J. (2016). Birth of the cool: African American culture and the beat identity. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 2(4), 104-109.

Moskalenko, O. I., & Didenko, O. V. (2018). A computer tool for training pilots’ listening skills in aviation English. ???????????? ?????????? ? ?????? ????????, (67,? 5), 187-198.

Ndimele, O. M. (2016). 7. Globalisation and the Vanishing Voices of Africa: Any Glimmer of Hope at this Turbulent Sea?. ICT, Globalisation and the Study of Languages and Linguistics in Africa, 115.

Obraztsov, P. I. (2000). Psikhologo-pedagogicheskiye aspekty razrabotki i primeneniya v vuze informatsionnykh tekhnologiy obucheniya [Psychological and pedagogical aspects of the development and use of information technology training at the university]. Orel: Orlovskiy gosudarstvennyy tekhnicheskiy universitet, 145.

Ozturk, I. (2007). The textual organisation of research article introductions in applied linguistics: Variability within a single discipline. English for specific purposes, 26(1), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.12.003

Paul, L. K., Van Lancker-Sidtis, D., Schieffer, B., Dietrich, R., & Brown, W. S. (2003). Communicative deficits in agenesis of the corpus callosum: nonliteral language and affective prosody. Brain and language, 85(2), 313-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00062-2

Riezina, O. V. (2003). Service as a means of forming information retrieval skills” Computer-based learning systems. Scientific bulletin of NPU named after M.P. Drahomanov, 7, 192-202.

Ritonga, M., Kustati, M., Budiarti, M., Lahmi, A., Asmara, M., Kurniawan, R., Putri, N., & Yenti, E. (2021). Arabic as foreign language learning in pandemic COVID-19 as perceived by students and teachers. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(1), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v5n1.726

Salem, A. A. M. (2013). The impact of technology (BBM and WhatsApp applications) on English linguistics in Kuwait. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 2(4), 65-69.

Sarker, A., & Gonzalez, G. (2017). A corpus for mining drug-related knowledge from Twitter chatter: Language models and their utilities. Data in brief, 10, 122-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2016.11.056

Saukh, P., & Chumak, L. (2018). Ten Top Problems of Education. From Cognitive Dissonance to the Algorithm of the Future Renaissance. Education: Modern Discourses, (1), 24-31.

Sharov, S., Filatova, O., & Sharova, T. (2020). The Development of an Online Platform for Studying Ukrainian Literature. TEM Journal, 9(3), 1171.

Shums’kyi, O. L. (2020). Use of it for Future Foreign Language Teachers’linguistic Self-Education. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 75(1), 269-278.

Shvachych, H. H., Tolstoi, V., Petrechuk, L., Ivashchenko, Y., Huliaieva, O., & Sobolenko, O. (2017). Modern information and communication technologies. Dnipro, Ukraine: National Metalurgic Academy of Ukraine.

Sipilä, K. (2014). Educational use of information and communications technology: Teachers’ perspective. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(2), 225-241.

Spolsky, B., & Hult, F. M. (Eds.). (2008). The handbook of educational linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Sugyaningsih, R. S., & Mardiana, R. S. R. (2017). Indonesian text about Javanese culture into English text: most common translation strategies on the perspective of Vinay and Darbelnet. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 3(3), 10-18.

Sultan, N. (2010). Cloud computing for education: A new dawn?. International Journal of Information Management, 30(2), 109-116.

Taguchi, N. (2015). “Contextually” speaking: A survey of pragmatic learning abroad, in class, and online. System, 48, 3-20.

Toms, E. G., & O'Brien, H. L. (2008). Understanding the information and communication technology needs of the e?humanist. Journal of Documentation.

Wu, W. C. V., Marek, M., & Chen, N. S. (2013). Assessing cultural awareness and linguistic competency of EFL learners in a CMC-based active learning context. System, 41(3), 515-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.05.004

Yang, S. Y. (2009). OntoPortal: An ontology-supported portal architecture with linguistically enhanced and focused crawler technologies. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(6),10148-10157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.004

Published

2021-06-17

How to Cite

Koroliova, V., Grechenko, V., Kovalchuk, M., Samoilenko, V., Shevchenko, T., & Zaitseva, V. (2021). Information and communication activity of students when writing a course work on linguistics. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(1), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v5n1.1062

Issue

Section

Research Articles