Intangible cultural heritage as a resource for consolidating modern Ukrainian society

Hanna Chmil; Inna Kuznietsova; Maryna Mishchenko; Oleksandra Oliynyk; Violeta Demeshchenko

doi:10.21744/lingcure.v5nS4.1713

Authors

Hanna Chmil
h-chmil6513@toronto-uni.com
National Academy of Arts of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
Inna Kuznietsova National Academy of Arts of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
Maryna Mishchenko National Academy of Arts of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
Oleksandra Oliynyk National Academy of Arts of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
Violeta Demeshchenko National Academy of Arts of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

Keywords:

consciousness, language, self-identification, spiritual culture, traditions

Abstract

The relevance of this study lied in actualising the issue of increasing the level of social consolidation of Ukrainian society under the conditions of a number of political, economic, social, and cultural transformations. Intangible cultural heritage serves as the main resource for the establishment and development of national consciousness, which, in turn, strengthens integration processes within society. The purpose of the study is to prove the value of intangible cultural heritage in the modern life of Ukrainians and substantiate the need to preserve cultural values in the course of historical development as a powerful ethno-unifying factor. In the course of the study, general scientific methods, namely analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, systematic, and comparative were used for logical and consistent presentation of the material. A critical approach to information allowed comprehensively and thoroughly examining the issue of cultural heritage as a unifying factor. As a result of the study, it was discovered that due to complex socio-political and globalisation processes, there is still a need to preserve the traditional heritage, which is an indicator of cultural independence, proving the uniqueness and originality of each nation. Therefore, in the course of the technologisation of society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afonin, E. A., & Martynov, A. Y. (2020). Tradition as a factor of integration and consolidation of ukrainian society in the conditions of postmodern: archetypic approach. Public Governance, (1), 27-41.

Aralbay, S., Telebaev, G., Bekezhan, O., Sagatova, A., & Abdrahmanova, K. (2021). The problem of the nation and national values in the ideology of Marxism. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 28(3), 56-63.

Arizpe, L. (2020). The genealogy of intangible cultural heritage. Culture, Diversity and Heritage: Major Studies, 12, 100–117.

Baum, W. M., Richerson, P. J., Efferson, C. M., & Paciotti, B. M. (2004). Cultural evolution in laboratory microsocieties including traditions of rule giving and rule following. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(5), 305-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.05.003

Bokuchava, G. (2017). Factors of Ukrainian society’s consolidation. Rahvusvaheline Kaitseuuringute Keskus Anternational Centre for Defence and Securiry.

Butsenko, O. (2020). Culture and cultural heritage issues projected on SDGs. Art History of Ukraine, 20, 8-13.

Cargile, A. C., Giles, H., Ryan, E. B., & Bradac, J. J. (1994). Language attitudes as a social process: A conceptual model and new directions. Language & Communication, 14(3), 211-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(94)90001-9

Chen, C. Y., & Li, C. I. (2013). Assessing the spiritual leadership effectiveness: The contribution of follower's self-concept and preliminary tests for moderation of culture and managerial position. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 240-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.11.004

Clark, K. B. (2018). Possible origins of consciousness in simple control over “involuntary” neuroimmunological action. Consciousness and cognition, 61, 76-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.04.002

Demian, V. (2020). Conceptual framework of the ich in the modern scientific discourse. Art History of Ukraine, 20, 14-19.

Esfehani, M. H. (2016). Intangible cultural heritage and tourism in protected areas: thesis of candidate of doctor of philosophy. Dunedin: University of Otago.

Filippetti, M. L., & Tsakiris, M. (2017). Heartfelt embodiment: Changes in body-ownership and self-identification produce distinct changes in interoceptive accuracy. Cognition, 159, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.11.002

Giglitto, D., Ciolfi, L., & Bosswick, W. (2021). Building a bridge: opportunities and challenges for intangible cultural heritage at the intersection of institutions, civic society, and migrant communities. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 1, 1-18.

Grabovska, I. M. (2017). Civil Society as one of the decisive factors of the Ukrainians’ consolidation in the Postcolonial period. Scientific and Theoretical Almanac Grani, 20(2), 87-91.

Honcharenko, V.D., & Shyhal, D.A. (2021). Technique of generalization of results of comparative historical and legal research. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 28(3), 74-84.

Humeniuk, I. M. (2020). Ukrainian language for professional purposes: Life cycle of the discipline and its status in modern pedagogical institutions of higher education. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Pedagogy and Psychology”, 6(2), 185-195.

Jacquemet, M. (2005). Transidiomatic practices: Language and power in the age of globalization. Language & communication, 25(3), 257-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2005.05.001

Jokilehto, J. (2006). Considerations on authenticity and integrity in world heritage context. City & Time, 2(1), 1-16.

Kitsikidis, A., Chantas, G., Dimitropoulos, K., & Nikolopoulos, S. (2017). Intangible cultural heritage and new technologies: Challenges and opportunities for cultural preservation and development. mixed reality and gamification for cultural heritage. In: A. Kitsikidis, K. Dimitropoulos, F. Tsalakanidou, M. Alivizatou-Barakou (Eds), Mixed Reality and Gamification for Cultural Heritage (pp. 129-158). Cham: Springer.

Kovalenko, O. V., Yepyk, L. I., Yeromenko, A. Y., Kashynska, O. Y., & Bezruchenkov, Y. V. (2021). Training of the future tourist guides for intercultural communicative interaction within professional activity. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S4), 729-746. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS4.1712

Kukharchuk, O. S., Oliinyk, V. V., & Lalak, N. V. (2019). Influence of Ukrainian emigration on the process of state formation in Transcarpathia in 20-30s of the ?? ?en. (national and cultural activity). Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Pedagogy and Psychology”, 2(10), 12-16.

Lenzerini, F. (2011). Intangible cultural heritage: The living culture of peoples. European Journal of International Law, 22(1), 101-120.

Lozynska, T. M. (2021). Archetypes and imagination in the formation of rural neo-societies: Conclusions for the state policy of rural development. Ukrainian Society, 1(76), 69-76.

Lypak, H., Kunanets, N., Pasichnyk, V., & Veretennikova, N. (2020). Digitized Historical and Cultural Heritage Consolidation Technologies: From a Territorial Resource to a National Portal. In 2020 10th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT) (pp. 891-896). IEEE.

Malysh, N., Shevchenko, V., & Tkachuk-Miroshnychenko, O. (2021). State policy in the sphere of protection of cultural heritage in Ukraine. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 11(3), 262-279.

Masreng, R., Beratha, N. S., Sudipa, I. N., & Laksana, I. K. D. (2017). Savukh Rangin ritual: A study of social semiotics. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 3(2), 100-106.

Mergos, G., & Patsavos, N. (2016). Cultural heritage as economic value. Athens: InHeriT.

Olkhova, N. V. (2021). Development of the ideological culture of the future primary school teacher in the conditions of the new Ukrainian school. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Pedagogy and Psychology”, 7(3), 102-109.

Petronela, ?. (2016). The importance of the intangible cultural heritage in the economy. Procedia Economics and Finance, 39, 731-736.

Qi, M. (2021). The role and status of drama in spiritual and material culture. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S2), 487-500. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS2.1385

Romano, D., Pfeiffer, C., Maravita, A., & Blanke, O. (2014). Illusory self-identification with an avatar reduces arousal responses to painful stimuli. Behavioural brain research, 261, 275-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2013.12.049

Rozlutska, G. ?. (2018). Role of Greek and catholic church of Transcarpathia in formation of national consciousness of Ukrainian people (1771–1867). Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Pedagogy and Psychology”, 1(7), 52-55.

Rus, M., & Rusu, D. O. (2015). The organizational culture in public and private institutions. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 187, 565-569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.105

Saarinen, J. (2006). Traditions of sustainability in tourism studies. Annals of tourism research, 33(4), 1121-1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2006.06.007

Sentana, G. D. D., Cika, I. W., Suarka, I. N., & Kusuma, I. N. W. (2021). Permas oral traditions function in Mundeh traditional village. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 7(1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v7n1.1144

Seth, A. K. (2008). Post-decision wagering measures metacognitive content, not sensory consciousness. Consciousness and cognition, 17(3), 981-983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.05.008

Shapovalova, N., & Burlyuk, O. (2018). Civil Society and Change in Ukraine Post-Euromaidan: An Introduction. Civil society in post-Euromaidan Ukraine: from revolution to consolidation, 193, 11-38.

Suryasa, W. (2019). Historical Religion Dynamics: Phenomenon in Bali Island. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 11(6), 1679-1685.

Szmelter, I. (2013). New values of cultural heritage and the need for a new paradigm regarding its care. In CeROArt. Conservation, exhibition, Restoration of Works of Art (No. HS). Association CeROArt asbl.

Terzyan, A. (2020). Towards Democratic Consolidation? Ukraine After the Revolution of Dignity. Open Political Science, 3(1), 183-191.

Tovkanets, H. V., & Glebova, ?. ?. (2020). Socio-cultural competence in the professional training of future primary school teachers. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Pedagogy and Psychology”, 1(11), 101-104.

Trusova, N. V., Kyrylov, Y. Y., Hranovska, V. Hr., Pryst?mskyi, O. S., Krykunova, V. M., & Sakun, A. Zh. (2020). The imperatives of the development of the tourist services market in spatial polarization of the regional tourist system. Geojournal of Tourism and Geosites, 29(2), 565-582.

Xtaxkgakget Makgkaxtlawana. (2021). the Centre for Indigenous Arts and its contribution to safeguarding the intangible cultural heritage of the Totonac people of Veracruz, Mexico.

Yan, W.-J., Chiou, S.-C. (2021). The safeguarding of intangible cultural heritage from the perspective of civic participation: The informal education of Chinese embroidery handicrafts. Sustainability, 13, 1-21.