Peculiarity of the concept of a hero in the novel of Vladimir Nabokov “Lolita” Humbert


  • Basira Azizaliyeva Institute of Literature named after Nizami Ganjavi, Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences, Baku, Azerbaijan Republic


aesthetics, concept of hero, criticism, english works, humbert, lolita, postmodernism, psychological character, vladimir nabokov, world literature


“Lolita” written by Vladimir Nabokov has been considered as an important occasion in the history of world literature for its theme and concept of its characters. Humbert is one of the main characters in the novel “Lolita” with literary mission, serving to demonstrate several psychological and physiological problems, reflecting reasons and effects of various problems that were actual for the society during that time. Since “Lolita” was written during the period when postmodernism influence was observed in the works of Nabokov, it is very noticeable to find postmodern tendencies in the writer’s style and in his main character. While assessing Humbert in this context, author’s original approach becomes apparent due to some occasions which are caused by psychological and physiological problems. For this purpose, research on interpretation of Humbert’s stance showed that Humbert’s attitude towards Lolita and his controversial traits are presented in comparison with Freud psychoanalytic theory. Comparative analysis has showed that Humbert is a character who directly affects interpretation of characters and evaluation of events. It involves tendencies of that time and takes upon a mission to analyse existing wishes of human that can’t be openly expressed and to reveal threats that are triggered by those traits.


Download data is not yet available.


Anastasyev, N. (1992). Character of Nabokov. Moscow: Sovetskiy Pisatel.

Farahani, M. F., Mirzamohamadi, M. H., & Noroozi, N. (2014). The study on features of informal education in postmodernism. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 559-563.

Foster, J. B. (1993). Nabokov's Art of Memory and European Modernism. Princeton University Press.

Freud, S. (1989). The future of an illusion, reissue.

Freud, S. (2010). Psychology of the Unconscious. Saint-Petersburg: Piter.

Freud, S. (2016). A General Introduction to Psychoanalysis Paperback. Scotts Valley: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

Hoosain, R. (1992). Psychological reality of the word in Chinese. In Advances in psychology (Vol. 90, pp. 111-130). North-Holland.

Ibragimova, Ch. S. (2013). V. Nabokov's Creativity and American 20th Century Modernist Novel. Baku: Ministry of Education of the Republic of Azerbaijan.

Ismailov, F. (1994). Sigmund Freud. Baku: Shirvan.

Kamal, R. (2010). Activity as a Game of Loneliness. Baku: Shirvan.

Ljunggren, A. (1989). Vladimir Nabokov's Lolita: A Story of Wandering. Russian Literature, 25(2), 199-213.

MacEachren, A. M., Pike, W., Yu, C., Brewer, I., Gahegan, M., Weaver, S. D., & Yarnal, B. (2006). Building a geocollaboratory: supporting Human–Environment Regional Observatory (HERO) collaborative science activities. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 30(2), 201-225.

Murdoch, J., & Pratt, A. C. (1993). Rural studies: modernism, postmodernism and the ‘post-rural’. Journal of rural studies, 9(4), 411-427.

Nabokov, V. (2009a). Laura and Her Original. Moscow: Azbuka.

Nabokov, V. (2009b). Lolita. Moscow: Azbuka.

Nabokov, V. V. (1996). Novels, 1955-1962 (Vol. 88). Library of America Vladimir Na.

Power, F. C., & Khmelkov, V. T. (1998). Character development and self-esteem: Psychological foundations and educational implications. International Journal of Educational Research, 27(7), 539-551.

Rutledge, D. S. (2010). Nabokov’s Permanent Mystery. The Expression of Metaphysics in.

Schiff, S. (2000). Vera (Mrs. Vladimir Nabokov). New York: McFarland.

Shrayer, M. D. (1998). Vladimir Nabokov and Ivan Bunin: A Reconstruction. Russian Literature, 43(3), 339-411.

Toth, E. L. (2002). Postmodernism for modernist public relations: The cash value and application of critical research in public relations. Public Relations Review, 28(3), 243-250.

Tybjerg, K. (2003). Wonder-making and philosophical wonder in Hero of Alexandria. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 34(3), 443-466.

Wood, A. M., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Kashdan, T. B., & Hurling, R. (2011). Using personal and psychological strengths leads to increases in well-being over time: A longitudinal study and the development of the strengths use questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(1), 15-19.

Li, Z. X. ., & Huan, C. Y. . (2019). Chinese and North American culture: A new perspective in linguistics studies. Linguistics and Culture Review, 3(1), 14-31.

Biletska, I. O., Paladieva, A. F., Avchinnikova, H. D., & Kazak, Y. Y. (2021). The use of modern technologies by foreign language teachers: developing digital skills. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S2), 16-27.

Chagani, F. (2017). Postmodernism. e-Dalga, 2, 23-25.



How to Cite

Azizaliyeva, B. (2021). Peculiarity of the concept of a hero in the novel of Vladimir Nabokov “Lolita” Humbert. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S2), 28-35.



Research Articles