Feedback to EFL learners’ writing

An investigation of teachers and students’ perceptions at a Saudi University

https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS1.2209

Authors

  • Bader Alharbi Department of English and Translation, College of Science and Arts, Qassim University, Ar Rass, Saudi Arabia

Keywords:

feedback, second language writing, students’ perceptions, teacher feedback, writing instruction

Abstract

Teachers’ feedback is the backbone of students’ learning experience and one that helps them stem their errors early. At the same time, the perceptions of teachers and learners to the role of feedback in second language skills is central to developing healthy classroom practices. This is also the aim of this study which investigates the perceptions of teachers and students to feedback to writing output in an EFL environment in a Saudi University. The study sample comprises 35 students and 5 teachers at Qassim University, Saudi Arabia. The study uses questionnaires and supplementary interviews in a field survey to obtain the data. The findings show that both students and teachers have a positive perception to written feedback, espousing it as a fundamental instructional delivery tool in EFL pedagogy that improves learning outcomes. Moreover, the majority of the participants report that written feedback positively influences learning outcomes through correction of grammar in students’ writing. Similarly, the study shows that teachers depend on different mechanisms to select the nature of feedback as well as the interest of students and curricular instructions. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Ahdal, A. A. M. H., & Alqasham, F. H. (2020). EFL writing tasks and the application of the concept of situatedness: evaluating the theoretical and practical aspects of the Saudi EFL Context. TESOL International Journal, 15(4), 167-190.

Al-Hazmi, S., & Scholfield, P. (2007). Enforced revision with checklist and peer feedback in EFL writing: The example of Saudi university students. Scientific Journal of King Faisal University (Humanities and Management Sciences), 8(2), 237-267.

Al-Hazzani, N., & Altalhab, S. (2018). Can explicit written corrective feedback develop grammatical and lexical accuracy of Saudi EFL learners?. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(4), 16-24.

Alkhatib, N. (2015). Written corrective feedback at a Saudi university: English language teachers’ beliefs, students’ preferences, and teachers’ practices (Doctoral dissertation, University of Essex).

Alshahrani, A., & Storch, N. (2014). Investigating teachers’ written corrective feedback practices in a Saudi EFL context: How do they align with their beliefs, institutional guidelines, and students’ preferences? Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 37(2), 101-122.

Bahous, R., Bacha, N. N., & Nabhani, M. (2011). Multilingual educational trends and practices in Lebanon: A case study. International Review of Education, 57(5), 737-749.

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2009). The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback. ELT journal, 63(3), 204-211.

Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2012). What is the problem with feedback?. In Feedback in higher and professional education (pp. 11-20). Routledge.

Cavalcanti, A. P., Diego, A., Mello, R. F., Mangaroska, K., Nascimento, A., Freitas, F., & Gaševi?, D. (2020). How good is my feedback? A content analysis of written feedback. In Proceedings of the tenth international conference on learning analytics& knowledge (pp. 428-437).

Chong, S. W. (2018). Three paradigms of classroom assessment: Implications for written feedback research. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(4), 330-347.

Creswell, J., & Clark, V. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Dictionary, O. E. (2007). Oxford UP. Web.

Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1(1) 3-18.

https://doi.org/10.5070/l2.v1i1.9054

Ferris, D. (2015). Written corrective feedback in L2 writing: Connors & Lunsford (1988); Lunsford & Lunsford (2008); Lalande (1982). Language Teaching, 48(4), 531-544.

Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be?. Journal of second language writing, 10(3), 161-184.

Frodesen, J. (2018). Grammar and Second Language Writing. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1-7.

Ghosn-Chelala, M. and Al-Chibani, W. (2018). Screencasting: supportive feedback for EFL remedial writing students", International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(3), 146-159. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-08-2017-0075

Grami, M. (2005). The effect of teachers’ written feedback on ESL students’ perception: A study in a Saudi ESL university-level context. Annual Review of Education, Communication and Language Sciences, 2(1), 10-13.

Harutyunyan, L., & Poveda, M. F. (2018). Students' Perception of Peer Review in an EFL Classroom. English language teaching, 11(4), 138-151.

Hyland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3), 255-286.

Lalande, J. F. (1982). Reducing composition errors: An experiment. Modern Language Journal, 66, 140-149.

Lavolette, E., Polio, C., & Kahng, J. (2015). The accuracy of computer-assisted feedback and students’ responses to it. Language Learning & Technology, 19, 50–68.

Layali, K., & Al-Shlowiy, A. (2020). Students’ perceptions of e-learning for ESL/EFL in Saudi universities at time of coronavirus: A literature review. Indonesian EFL Journal, 6(2), 97-108.

Li, Zhan. 2016. “Written Teacher Feedback: Student Perceptions, Teacher Perceptions, and Actual Teacher Performance.” English Language Teaching 9 (8): 73–84.

Lyster, R., & Mori, H. (2006). Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in second language acquisition, 28(2), 269-300.

Miceli, T. (2006). Foreign language students’ perceptions of a reflective approach to text correction. Flinders University Languages Group Online Review, 3(1) https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Foreign-Language-students

Mustafa, R. F. (2012). Feedback on the feedback: Sociocultural interpretation of Saudi ESL learners' opinions about writing feedback. English Language Teaching, 5(3), 3-15.

Qutob, M. M., & Madini, A. A. (2020). Saudi EFL Learners' Preferences of the Corrective Feedback on Written Assignment. English Language Teaching, 13(2), 16-27.

Sheen, Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language teaching research, 8(3), 263-300.

Srichanyachon, N. (2012). Teacher written feedback for L2 learners’ writing development. Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies (Former Name Silpakorn University Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts), 12(1) 7-17.

Storch, N. (2018). Written corrective feedback from sociocultural theoretical perspectives: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 51(2), 262–277. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000034

Tian, L., & Li, L. (2018). Chinese EFL learners’ perception of peer oral and written feedback as providers, receivers and observers. Language Awareness, 27(4), 312-330.

Umer, M., Ahmad, B., & Soomro, A. F. (2018). Saudi Learners? Perceptions of Feedback on Written Tasks. International Research Journal of Arts & Humanities (IRJAH), 46(46), 63-76.

Vattøy, K. D., & Smith, K. (2019). Students' perceptions of teachers' feedback practice in teaching English as a foreign language. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85, 260-268.

Westmacott, A. (2017). Direct vs. indirect written corrective feedback: Student perceptions. Íkala, revista de lenguajey cultura, 22(1), 17-32.

Yoshihara, R. (2008). The bridge between students and teachers: The effect of dialogue journal writing. Language Teacher, 32(11), 3-7.

Zacharias, N. T. (2007). Teacher and student attitudes toward teacher feedback. RELC Journal, 38(1), 38-52.

Zaman, M. M., & Azad M. A. K. (2012). Feedback in EFL writing at tertiary level: teachers' and learners' perceptions. ASA University Review, 6(1), 139-156.

Zhan, L. (2016). Written Teacher Feedback: Student Perceptions, Teacher Perceptions, and Actual Teacher Performance. English Language Teaching, 9(8), 73-84

Zhang, Z., & Hyland, K. (2018). Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 36, 90-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004

Zheng, Y., & Yu, S. (2018). Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: A case study of Chinese lower-proficiency students. Assessing Writing, 37, 13-24.

Published

2021-12-27

How to Cite

Alharbi, B. (2021). Feedback to EFL learners’ writing: An investigation of teachers and students’ perceptions at a Saudi University. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 1671-1683. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS1.2209