The ecological system of the digital educational environment as a new definition of modern education in the view of teachers

Elena A. Sorokoumova; Elena I. Cherdymova; Elena B. Puchkova; Larisa V. Temnova; Maria V. Ferapontova

doi:10.21744/lingcure.v5nS3.2012

Authors

Elena A. Sorokoumova Moscow Pedagogical State University, Moscow, Russia
Elena I. Cherdymova Samara State University, Samara, Russia
Elena B. Puchkova Moscow Pedagogical State University, Moscow, Russia
Larisa V. Temnova
temnova.larisa@yandex.ru
Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Department of Modern Sociology Lomonosov, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
Maria V. Ferapontova Moscow Pedagogical State University, Moscow, Russia

Keywords:

digital education, digital products, ecology, students, teachers

Abstract

Digital technologies and products are a new reality of modern education, but the degree of their influence on the ecology of the digital educational environment has not been fully studied. The article examines teachers' ideas about a new definition of education - the ecology of the digital educational environment; about the impact of digital educational products on the cognitive, personal and activity sphere of students. Implement the tasks set, an anonymous online survey of teachers of secondary schools in Moscow, the Moscow region, Voronezh, Nizhny Novgorod, Samara was conducted using the Google form. The article, based on the analysis of teachers' ideas about the ecology of the digital educational environment, risk zones and their impact on the cognitive, personal and activity spheres of students are identified; criteria for assessing the impact of digital educational products on cognitive processes, personal qualities and motivation of students learning activities are determined; indicators for each type of criteria are considered. The article shows, in the view of teachers, digital educational products have an ambivalent impact on the development of a student: they act as a resource, a means of development, and at the same time, they are risky for the development of a student.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akhmetova, S. G., & Nevskaya, L. V. (2018). The experience of introducing new technologies in higher professional education. Bulletin of the Perm National Research Polytechnic University. Socio-economic sciences, 2, 62-69.

Akimova, O. B., & Shcherbin, M. D. (2018). Digital transformation of education: timeliness of educational and cognitive independence of students. Innovative projects and programs in education, 1, 27-34.

Aryani, I. G. A. I., & Rahayuni, N. K. S. (2016). Innovation of teaching and learning english applied to animal sciences’ student with the combination of computer media and audio visual. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 2(1), 1-7. Retrieved from https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/ijllc/article/view/78

Bagautdinova, N. G., & Bagautdinova, R. A. (2018). New competitive advantages in the conditions of digitalization. Innovations, 8(238), 80-83.

Balalaeva, D. (2015). Political competition, agenda power, and incentives to innovate: An empirical examination of vested?interest theory. Review of Policy Research, 32(4), 413-442.

Bascompte, J. (2007). Networks in ecology. Basic and Applied Ecology, 8(6), 485-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2007.06.003

Bayanova, A. R., Sabaeva, E. K., Sakhipova, Z. M., Zatsepina, M. B., Tararina, L. I., Votinov, A. A., & Ilkevich, K. B. (2019). Educational environment ecology as factor of university teacher health saving in context of education and science reforms in modern Russia. Ekoloji, 28(107), 4937-4941.

Beck, U. (2011). Cosmopolitanism as imagined communities of global risk. American behavioral scientist, 55(10), 1346-1361.

Beck, U. (2016). The Metamorphosis of the World. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Blinov, V. I., Dulinov, M. V., Yesenina, E. Y., & Sergeev, I. S. (2019). Didactic concept of digital vocational education and training.

Demkin, J. A. (Ed.). (2003). Security Planning and Design: A Guide for Architects and Building Design Professionals. John Wiley & Sons.

Denisenkova, N. S., & Krasilo, T. A. (2019). Razvitie doshkol'nikov v epokhu tsifrovoy sotsializatsii [Development of preschoolers in the era of digital socialization]. Sovremennoe doshkol'noe obrazovanie, (6), 96.

Garg, A. X., Norman, G., & Sperotable, L. (2001). How medical students learn spatial anatomy. The lancet, 357(9253), 363-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03649-7

Grigoriev, A. V. (2020). Risks of digitalization of school education (based on the materials of a survey of teachers in Astrakhan). Society: sociology, psychology, pedagogy, (6), 74.

Jusmawati, J., Satriawati, S., Akhiruddin, A., Rahman, A., Arsyad, N., & Irman, R. (2021). Developing mathematics learning devices based on creative problem solving model in elementary school. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(1), 406-421. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5n1.1807

Kornilov, Y. V. (2017). Orientalizm v ideologii i politike Aleksandra Velikogo [Orientalizm in the ideology in the policy of Alexander the Great].

Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of adolescent health, 41(6), S22-S30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.017

Kravchenko, S. A. (2019). Digital risks, metamorphoses and centrifugal trends among the young people. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, (10), 48-57.

Kuzmin, A. A. & Kuzmina T. A. (2020) Architecture of a multi-window user interface of an electronic textbook. Psychological and pedagogical problems of human and society security, 2(47), 51-57.

Madjdi, A. H., & Rokhayani, A. (2021). Lesson study in increasing student learning participation in class. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S3), 911-917. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS3.1687

Moore, P. D. (1989). The ecology of peat-forming processes: a review. International Journal of Coal Geology, 12(1-4), 89-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-5162(89)90048-7

Nakhalov, V. A. & Savin, E. Z. (2016). Didactic requirements for electronic educational publications. Problems and prospects for the development of education in technical universities. Collection of materials of the scientific and methodological conference dedicated to the memory of V.G. Grigorenko (pp. 240-244).

Nugraha, D. Y., Sudirman, M. I., Rudianto, R., Ferdiansyah, D., Ismail, I., Yani, A., Utami, C., Hajid, M. K., & Syawal, M. P. (2020). Increasing prosocial behavior through caring scout activities. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 6(5), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v6n5.959

Nylén, D., & Holmström, J. (2015). Digital innovation strategy: A framework for diagnosing and improving digital product and service innovation. Business Horizons, 58(1), 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.09.001

Papastergiou, M. (2009). Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers & education, 52(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.004

Peitz, M., & Waelbroeck, P. (2006). Piracy of digital products: A critical review of the theoretical literature. Information Economics and Policy, 18(4), 449-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2006.06.005

Puchkova, E. B., Temnova, L. V., Sorokoumova, E. A., & Kurnosova, M. G. (2019). Relationship Between Values and Career Orientations in Modern Adolescents. ÏÑÈÕÎËÎÃÈ× ÅÑÊÀß ÍÀÓÊÀ È ÎÁÐÀÇÎÂÀÍÈÅ PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION, 24(5), 35.

Shaidullina, A. R., Zakirova, V. G., Kashurnikov, S. N., Arestova, E. N., Shmidt, A. N., & Kovaleva, N. I. (2018). Students training for innovative entrepreneurial activity: Social responsibility competences. Espacios, 39(2), 15-15.

Smith, R. C., Iversen, O. S., & Hjorth, M. (2015). Design thinking for digital fabrication in education. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 5, 20-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2015.10.002

Sorokoumova, E. A., Cherdymova, E. I., Rezvantseva, M. O., Kochneva, L. V., Latysheva, V. V., & Perkova, E. P. (2019). Environmental and Social Practices of Old Stuff Use and Disposal by Students. Ekoloji, 28(107), 5065-5069.

Ulug, M., Ozden, M. S., & Eryilmaz, A. (2011). The effects of teachers’ attitudes on students’ personality and performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 738-742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.144

Unianu, E. M. (2012). Teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 33, 900-904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.252

Voiskunsky, A. E. (2002). Internet Research in psychology. Internet and Russian society. M.: Gendalf, 235-250.

Widana, I.K., Dewi, G.A.O.C., Suryasa, W. (2020). Ergonomics approach to improve student concentration on learning process of professional ethics. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 12(7), 429-445.

Zong, F., & Zhen, S. X. (2021). The link between language and thought. Macrolinguistics and Microlinguistics, 2(1), 12–27. Retrieved from https://mami.nyc/index.php/journal/article/view/12