The effect of learning strategy and cognitive style on student’s narrative writing ability
Keywords:
cognitive style, expository-based communicative, inquiry-based communicative, learning strategy, writing narrative textAbstract
In the class, most of the teacher use a single teaching strategy to students who have different cognitive styles when teaching narrative essays in the class. Therefore, it is necessary to improve teaching strategies in the teaching and learning process. The teaching strategies that fit with the cognitive style of students in order that the learning objective is improved. This paper investigates the effect of learning strategy and cognitive style on student’s narrative writing ability. This study was conducted on the VII grade students at Madrasah Tsanawiyah Ibnu Taimiyah Bogor, West Java. Treatment by level design and two-factorial ANOVA analysis with ? = 0.05 were applied in this experimental study. The sample was 40 students grouped into experiment classes and 40 students was grouped into control classes. There was a different ability in narrative writing in Bahasa Indonesia between students having field independent cognitive style (A1) and students having field dependent cognitive style (A2). Results of two-way interrow analysis of variance showed that Fcalculated (4.123) was higher than Ftable (3.97) at a significant level of ? = 0.05.
Downloads
References
Abbas, A., Suriani, S., & Muchlis, M. (2021). Strategy for shapeing the character of students based on PAI in school. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 867-877. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS1.1471
Cox, R. (1999). Representation construction, externalised cognition and individual differences. Learning and instruction, 9(4), 343-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(98)00051-6
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4 Ausg.).
Dignath, C., Buettner, G., & Langfeldt, H. P. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively?: A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 101-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2008.02.003
Douglas, B. (2007). Teaching by Principles an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (Third). San Fransisco State University: Pearson Longman.
Gregory, A. T., & Denniss, A. R. (2018). An introduction to writing narrative and systematic reviews—Tasks, tips and traps for aspiring authors. Heart, Lung and Circulation, 27(7), 893-898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2018.03.027
Jariono, G., Nurhidayat, Sudarmanto, E., Kurniawan, A. T., & Nugroho, H. (2021). Strategies to teach children with special needs amid COVID-19 pandemic. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 633-641. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS1.1448
Kormos, J. (2011). Task complexity and linguistic and discourse features of narrative writing performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(2), 148-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.02.001
Montiel-Overall, P., & Grimes, K. (2013). Teachers and librarians collaborating on inquiry-based science instruction: A longitudinal study. Library & Information Science Research, 35(1), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2012.08.002
Naga, D. S. (1992). Pengantar teori sekor pada pengukuran pendidikan. Jakarta: Gunadarma.
Nugraha, M. G., & Awalliyah, S. (2016). Analisis gaya kognitif field dependent dan field independent terhadap penguasaan konsep fisika siswa kelas VII. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika (E-Journal) (Vol. 5, pp. SNF2016-EER).
Oxford, R. L., & Burry-Stock, J. A. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL). System, 23(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(94)00047-A
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., ... & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational research review, 14, 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Seli, P., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2012). Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition, 123(3), 335-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.003
Richards, J. C., Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (Eds.). (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge university press.
Shah, M. I. A., & Othman, N. (2006). Students' output in communicative language teaching classrooms. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature®, 12.
Shi, Y., Liu, H., Gao, L., & Zhang, G. (2011). Cellular particle swarm optimization. Information Sciences, 181(20), 4460-4493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2010.05.025
Suarez, A., Specht, M., Prinsen, F., Kalz, M., & Ternier, S. (2018). A review of the types of mobile activities in mobile inquiry-based learning. Computers & Education, 118, 38-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.004
Suryasa, I.W., Sudipa, I.N., Puspani, I.A.M., Netra, I.M. (2019). Translation procedure of happy emotion of english into indonesian in k???a text. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(4), 738–746
Tennant, M. (2007). Psychology and adult learning. Routledge.
Udu, H., Kusuma, I. N. W., & Alifuddin, M. (2016). Inheritance strategy for endangered oral tradition in the archipelago: (case study in inheritance of kangkilo oral tradition). International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 2(3), 69-76.
Weil, M., Calhoun, E., & Joyce, B. (2000). Models of teaching. Allyn and Bacon.
Weinstein, C. E., Husman, J., & Dierking, D. R. (2000). Self-regulation interventions with a focus on learning strategies. In Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 727-747). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50051-2
Wibisono, D. (2013). Panduan Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis, dan Disertasi, (Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi), h. 86. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.
Widanta, I. R. J., Sitawati, A. R., Aryana, I. R., & Ardika, I. D. (2016). Learning center with self-directed learning: a foundation for TOEFL learning activity. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 2(4), 64-71.
Witkin, H. (2016). Bipolar, one-dimensional models and measures.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2021 Linguistics and Culture Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.