Developing environmental integration teaching materials to improve cognitive flexibility


  • Irah Kasirah Special Education Faculty of Education, Jakarta State University, Indonesia
  • Nadiroh Pancasila and Civil Education, Faculty of Social Science, Jakarta State University, Indonesia
  • Hafid Abbas Faculty of Education, Jakarta State University, Indonesia


cognitive flexibility, environmental education, integration, learning strategies, teaching materials


This study aims to develop an innovative model of environmental integration learning in boosting cognitive flexibility. The research method used a Research & Development with the Dick and Carey development model. The sampling technique uses random sampling techniques. There are two groups of teachers. Data analysis used descriptive statistics and t-test to verify product differences and effectiveness. The output is in the form of teaching materials for environmental education learning strategies. Results showed that there was a very significant difference between the post-pre-test treatment score 19.68, higher than the post-pre-test score of the control 9,12. There was an increase in teachers' cognitive flexibility about environmental integration learning effectively and significantly after reading the teaching materials.


Download data is not yet available.


Abidoye, J. A. (2015). Effect of multimedia-based instructional package on secondary school students’ academic achievement in Geography in Oyo State, Nigeria. Journal of Research in National Development, 13(1), 21-25.

Ak?no?lu, O., & Tando?an, R. Ö. (2007). The effects of problem-based active learning in science education on students’ academic achievement, attitude and concept learning. Eurasia journal of mathematics, science and technology education, 3(1), 71-81.

Alexandar, R., & Poyyamoli, G. (2014). The effectiveness of environmental education for sustainable development based on active teaching and learning at high school level-a case study from Puducherry and Cuddalore regions, India. Journal of sustainability education, 7(1), 1-20.

Amori, H. (2021). Linguistics for language learning and research. Macrolinguistics and Microlinguistics, 2(1), 28–36. Retrieved from

Arends, R. I. (2004). Learning to teach. New York: Mc Graww Hill, Co.

Azzajjad, M. F., Tendrita, M., & Ahmar, D. S. (2021). Effect of animation and review video making (arvima) in non-classical learning model on independent learning and students’ learning outcome. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S3), 967-976.

Bal?m, A. G. (2009). The Effects of Discovery Learning on Students' Success and Inquiry Learning Skills. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research (EJER), (35).

Cañas, J., Quesada, J., Antolí, A., & Fajardo, I. (2003). Cognitive flexibility and adaptability to environmental changes in dynamic complex problem-solving tasks. Ergonomics, 46(5), 482-501.

Carleton-Hug, A., & Hug, J. W. (2010). Challenges and opportunities for evaluating environmental education programs. Evaluation and program planning, 33(2), 159-164.

Caves, R. E., & Bradburd, R. M. (1988). The empirical determinants of vertical integration. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 9(3), 265-279.

Cloonan, M., & Fingeret, A. L. (2020). Developing teaching materials for learners in surgery. Surgery, 167(4), 689-692.

Danilane, L., & Marzano, G. (2014). Consumer education in primary school in the context of sustainable development. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1068-1072.

De Graaf, E., & Kolmos, A. (2003). Characteristics of problem-based learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(5), 657-662.

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2005). The systematic design of instruction.

Frantz, C. M., & Mayer, F. S. (2014). The importance of connection to nature in assessing environmental education programs. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 41, 85-89.

Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction. Longman Publishing.

Gambari, I. A., & Yusuf, M. O. (2014). Development and Validation of computer instructional package on physics for secondary schools in Nigeria.

Hoang, T. T. P., & Kato, T. (2016). Measuring the effect of environmental education for sustainable development at elementary schools: A case study in Da Nang city, Vietnam. Sustainable Environment Research, 26(6), 274-286.

Ionescu, T. (2012). Exploring the nature of cognitive flexibility. New ideas in psychology, 30(2), 190-200.

Jones, R. H. (1997). Beyond “listen and repeat”: Pronunciation teaching materials and theories of second language acquisition. System, 25(1), 103-112.

Kanca, I. N., Ginaya, G., & Sri Astuti, N. N. (2020). The effectiveness of the problem solving method on learning outcomes of the English course for room division operation during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 7(1), 12-22.

Kankovskaya, A. R. (2016). Higher Education for Sustainable Development: Challenges in Russia. Procedia Cirp, 48, 449-453.

Kitamura, Y. (2014). The possibility of holistic safety education in Japan: from the perspective of education for sustainable development (ESD). IATSS research, 38(1), 40-47.

Kokorina, L. V., Potreba, N. A., Zharykova, M. V., & Horlova, O. V. (2021). Distance learning tools for the development of foreign language communicative competence. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S4), 1016-1034.

Lewalter, D. (2003). Cognitive strategies for learning from static and dynamic visuals. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 177-189.

Mauffette, Y., Kandlbinder, P., & Soucisse, A. (2004). The problem in problem-based learning is the problems: But do they motivate students.

Meilinda, H., Prayitno, B. A., & Karyanto, P. (2017). Student's Environmental Literacy Profile of Adiwiyata Green School in Surakarta, Indonesia. Journal of Education and Learning, 11(3), 299-306.

Nasibulina, A. (2015). Education for sustainable development and environmental ethics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 214, 1077-1082.

Nasional, D. P. (2006). Kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan.

Neroni, J., Meijs, C., Gijselaers, H. J., Kirschner, P. A., & de Groot, R. H. (2019). Learning strategies and academic performance in distance education. Learning and Individual Differences, 73, 1-7.

Omiola, M. A., Enuwa, M. R., Awoyemi, S. O., & Bada, A. A. (2012). Effect of developed video, instructional package on the performance of Senior Secondary School physics students in Ilorin Metropolis. British Journal of Science, 6(1), 45-46.

Payne, J. W., Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge university press.

Perry, M. K. (1989). Vertical integration: Determinants and effects. Handbook of industrial organization, 1, 183-255.

Rhedana, W. I. (2012). Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah dan Pertanyaan Sovratic untuk Menigkatkan Ketrampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan. Th XXXI,(3).

Ritter, S. M., Damian, R. I., Simonton, D. K., van Baaren, R. B., Strick, M., Derks, J., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2012). Diversifying experiences enhance cognitive flexibility. Journal of experimental social psychology, 48(4), 961-964.

Safo, A. D., Ezenwa, V. I., & Wushishi, D. I. (2013). Effects of computer assisted instructional package on junior secondary school students’ achievement and retention in geometry in Minna Niger State, Nigeria. International Journal of Humanities and social science invention, 2(5), 69-74.

Sánchez, I. A. (2004). Exploring the Critical Thinking Skills of Analysis and Evaluation in 9th Graders Through the Use of Authentic Materials and the Socratic Method. HOW journal, 11(1), 9-23.

Sritaratorn, K., & Sombunsukho, S. (2011). Developing a computer instructional package for a multimedia program. In 2nd WIETE Annual Conference on Engineering and Technology Education, Pattaya, Thailand.

Suduc, A. M., Bîzoi, M., & Gorghiu, G. (2014). Sustainable development in Romania in pre-school and primary education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1187-1192.

Suhirman, S. (2012). Pengaruh pembelajaran berbasis masalah dan kecerdasan naturalis terhadap kemampuan siswa dalam memecahkan masalah lingkungan hidup (studi eksperimen di SMPN 1 Mataram NTB). Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Lingkungan Dan Pembangunan, 13(1), 1-15.

Suryawanshi, K., & Narkhede, S. (2015). Green ICT for sustainable development: A higher education perspective. Procedia computer science, 70, 701-707.

Udu, H., Kusuma, I. N. W., & Alifuddin, M. (2016). Inheritance strategy for endangered oral tradition in the archipelago: (case study in inheritance of kangkilo oral tradition). International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 2(3), 69-76. Retrieved from

Widana, I.K., Dewi, G.A.O.C., Suryasa, W. (2020). Ergonomics approach to improve student concentration on learning process of professional ethics. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 12(7), 429-445.

Yaki, A. A., & Babagana, M. (2018). Technology Instructional Package Mediated Instruction and Senior Secondary School Students’ Academic Performance in Biology Concepts. MOJES: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(2), 42-48.



How to Cite

Kasirah, I., Nadiroh, N., & Abbas, H. (2021). Developing environmental integration teaching materials to improve cognitive flexibility. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S3), 1558-1573.



Research Articles