The kinship greetings of blood and marital ties in the Minangkabau community

A sociolinguistic study

https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS3.1817

Authors

  • Salliyanti Faculty of Cultural Studies, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
  • Hariadi Susiolo Faculty of Cultural Studies, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
  • Amhar Kudadiri Faculty of Cultural Studies, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

Keywords:

blood ties, cultural resistance, kinship, marital ties, social bounding

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the use of regional languages regarding forms of kinship based on blood and marital ties greetings by the Minangkabau's in the Bromo area. To analyze the forms of blood and marriage-related kinship greetings, a sociolinguistic study was applied. The data collection was listening to the informants' conversation regarding greetings for the Minangkabau community, followed by talking engaging techniques. The analyzed using the equivalent method with the qualitative approach. The results showed that form of blood kinship greeting such as Apak, Amak, Uda, Uni, Adiak, Anduang, Mak Gaek, Angku, Ungku, Pak Gaek, Mak Dang, Mak Wo, Mak Etek, Etek, Apak, Andeh, and Pak Etek. There are several types such as Uda, Ajo, Adiak, Abak, Amak, Uda, Ajo, Uni for marital ties greetings. These greetings, both blood, and marital kinship ties indicate cultural resistance and social bonding, which have roles in daily communication among the Minangkabau people.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Batibo, H. (2015). The prevalence of cultural diversity in a multilingual situation: the case of age and gender dimensions in the Shisukuma and Kiswahili greeting rituals. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 10(1), 100-111.

Bian, Y., Zhang, L., & Gao, Y. (2020). Social bonding and subjective wellbeing: findings from the 2017 ISSP Module. International Journal of Sociology, 50(1), 26-47.

Blum, A. (2016). The border between intimacy and anonymity in innocuous action: The greeting as a social form. Journal of Classical Sociology, 16(1), 69-83.

Chaer, A. (1988). Tata bahasa praktis bahasa Indonesia. Bhratara Karya Aksara.

Compton-Lilly, C. (2016). Reading students' lives: Literacy learning across time. Routledge.

Criaco, G., van Oosterhout, J. H., & Nordqvist, M. (2021). Is blood always thicker than water? Family firm parents, kinship ties, and the survival of spawns. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(6), 106161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2021.106161

Curran, S. R., McLanahan, S., & Knab, J. (2003). Does remarriage expand perceptions of kinship support among the elderly?. Social Science Research, 32(2), 171-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0049-089X(02)00046-7

Curtin, C. M., Barrett, H. C., Bolyanatz, A., Crittenden, A. N., Fessler, D. M., Fitzpatrick, S., ... & Henrich, J. (2020). Kinship intensity and the use of mental states in moral judgment across societies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(5), 415-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.07.002

Dal Pesco, F., & Fischer, J. (2018). Greetings in male Guinea baboons and the function of rituals in complex social groups. Journal of human evolution, 125, 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.10.007

Das, A., & Herring, S. C. (2016). Greetings and interpersonal closeness: The case of Bengalis on Orkut. Language & Communication, 47, 53-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2015.12.003

Dein, S. (2020). Transcendence, religion and social bonding. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 42(1), 77-88.

Dunbar, R. I. (2013). The origin of religion as a small-scale phenomenon. Religion, intolerance, and conflict: A scientific and conceptual investigation, 48-66.

Dunbar, R. I. M. (1998). Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Harvard University Press.

Emeka-Nwobia, N. U. (2020). Re-enacting identity in the greeting and address pattern among Nigerian Pentecostals. African Identities, 18(4), 479-490.

Gede Budasi, I. & Wayan Suryasa, I. (2021). The cultural view of North Bali community towards Ngidih marriage reflected from its lexicons. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(3), 1484–1497

Howden-Chapman, P. (1994). Blood ties: accountability for blood quality in New Zealand. Health Policy, 27(1), 35-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(94)90156-2

Ino, L., Dinar, S. S., Yunus, .-., & Harmin, .-. (2017). Survival Wolio language in adulthood in Baubau City: Sociolinguistic study. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 3(6), 1-13. Retrieved from https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/ijllc/article/view/1

Jafarova, K. A. (2021). The role of extralinguistic factors in interlingual relations and theoretical issues of interference. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(1), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5n1.415

Kartomihardjo, S. (1988). Bahasa cermin kehidupan masyarakat. Jakarta: Depdikbud.

Kezilahabi, E. (2001). A phenomenological interpretation of Kerebe greetings. Journal of African Cultural Studies, 14(2), 181-192.

Mondada, L. (2018). Greetings as a device to find out and establish the language of service encounters in multilingual settings. Journal of Pragmatics, 126, 10-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.09.003

Nababan, P. W. J. (1984). Sosiolinguistik: suatu pengantar. Gramedia.

Olivier, L. (2010). Greeting rituals as everyday management of differences among RasTafari groups in Stellenbosch. Anthropology Southern Africa, 33(3-4), 126-131.

Peters, J. (2005). True ambivalence: Child welfare workers' thoughts, feelings, and beliefs about kinship foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 27(6), 595-614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.11.012

Pillet-Shore, D. (2012). Greeting: Displaying stance through prosodic recipient design. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(4), 375-398.

Plyth, P. S., & Craham, C. P. (2020). Translation affects literary and cultural systems: how to observe the features of translation?. Applied Translation, 14(1), 29–37. Retrieved from https://appliedtranslation.nyc/index.php/journal/article/view/1141

Rymes, B. (2003). Contrasting zones of comfortable competence: Popular culture in a phonics lesson. Linguistics and Education, 14(3-4), 321-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2004.02.008

Rymes, B. (2014). Communicating beyond language: Everyday encounters with diversity. Routledge.

Rymes, B. (2015). Classroom discourse analysis: A tool for critical reflection. Routledge.

Setiawan, I. (2017). Relation of Sasak and Samawa Language: Diachronic study in the language kinship of an ethnic group in Indonesia. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 3(5), 83-90. Retrieved from https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/ijllc/article/view/226

Smith, A. P. (2020). Russell and the Handshake: Greeting in Spiritual Care. Journal of Pastoral Care & Counseling, 74(1), 33-41.

Smith, J. E., Powning, K. S., Dawes, S. E., Estrada, J. R., Hopper, A. L., Piotrowski, S. L., & Holekamp, K. E. (2011). Greetings promote cooperation and reinforce social bonds among spotted hyaenas. Animal Behaviour, 81(2), 401-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.11.007

Spencer-Oatey, H. (2018). Transformative learning for social integration: Overcoming the challenge of greetings. Intercultural Education, 29(2), 301-315.

Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan aneka teknik analisis bahasa: Pengantar penelitian wahana kebudayaan secara linguistis. Duta Wacana University Press.

Syafruddin, S., Thaba, A., Rahim, A. R., Munirah, M., & Syahruddin, S. (2021). Indonesian people’s sarcasm culture: an ethnolinguistic research. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(1), 160-179. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5n1.1150

Published

2021-11-19

How to Cite

Salliyanti, S., Susiolo, H., & Kudadiri, A. (2021). The kinship greetings of blood and marital ties in the Minangkabau community: A sociolinguistic study. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S3), 1356-1367. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS3.1817

Issue

Section

Research Articles