Political pluralism as a factor in the development of modern society and state

Sergey D. Andreev; Emma V. Bitsieva; Olga V. Lepeshkina; Dmitry M. Polonsky; Marina S. Savchenko

doi:10.21744/lingcure.v5nS3.1686

Authors

Sergey D. Andreev
1335088@bsu.edu.ru
Belgorod National Research University, 85 Pobedy Street, Belgorod, the Belgorod region, 308015, Russia
Emma V. Bitsieva Pyatigorsk state University, 9, Kalinin Ave, Stavropol region, Pyatigorsk, 357532, Russia
Olga V. Lepeshkina Kuban State University, 149 Stavropol'skaya St., Krasnodar, Russia
Dmitry M. Polonsky Belgorod National Research University, 85 Pobedy Street, Belgorod, the Belgorod region, 308015, Russia
Marina S. Savchenko Kuban State Agrarian University, 13, Kalinina Street, Krasnodar, 350044, Russia

Keywords:

freedom speech, parliament, political diversity, political parties, political pluralism, representation interests

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a study devoted to the legal phenomenon of political pluralism as a factor in the development of modern society and the state by the example of classical democratic countries. At the same time, attention is focused on such components of political pluralism as formalization of freedom of speech and assembly; a multi-party system, as well as a mechanism for coordinating the interests of various social groups at the parliamentary level. It was found that the most acceptable is the model operating in the FRG, since it allows people to find a balance between guarantees of political diversity, such as freedom of speech and the right to public events. The interaction between civil society institutions and parliamentarians is especially advisable when making decisions in the domestic and foreign policy of the state.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agnew, J. (1997). The dramaturgy of horizons: geographical scale in the ‘reconstruction of Italy’by the new Italian political parties, 1992–1995. Political geography, 16(2), 99-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(96)00046-7

Ahmed, S., Jaidka, K., & Cho, J. (2016). The 2014 Indian elections on Twitter: A comparison of campaign strategies of political parties. Telematics and Informatics, 33(4), 1071-1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.03.002

Berdikulov, S. N. (2021). Some aspects of improving the activities of political party factions in the development of the multiparty system. International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 241-244. https://doi.org/10.31295/ijss.v4n2.1709

Beshe-Golovko Karin (2010). Constitutional logic of the multi-party system in France. Comparative Constitutional Review, 4, 5-15. (In Russian)

Bezuglya, A.A., Gelunenko, V.V., Novikov, A.B., Radaeva, S.V., Tulnev, M.A. (2020). European Experience in Constitutional and Legal Guarantees of Freedom of the Media. Cuestiones políticas, 37(65), 127-135.

Breton, A., & Wintrobe, R. (1992). Freedom of speech vs. efficient regulation in markets for ideas. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 17(2), 217-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(92)90002-S

Carolin, R. (1997). Lobbyismus und Abgeordnetenbestechung. Aachen, Shaker, 18.

Celis, K. (2013). Representativity in times of diversity: The political representation of women. In Women's Studies International Forum (Vol. 41, pp. 179-186). Pergamon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.07.007

Eftedal, N. H., & Thomsen, L. (2021). Motivated moral judgments about freedom of speech are constrained by a need to maintain consistency. Cognition, 211, 104623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104623

Ershov, Y.U. (2018). France passed a law against fake news. Rossiyskaya Gazeta, November 21. (In Russian)

Gelunenko, V. V., Markhgeym, M. V., Shadzhe, A. M., Tkhabisimova, L. A., & Veliev, E. E. (2019). Freedom of speech in constitutional binds of eastern European countries. Amazonia Investiga, 8(19), 403-407.

Gutorova, A. N., Andreev, S. D., Arutyunyan, T. I., Korovin, V. V., & Troyan, V. A. (2020). Constitutional-Legal and Political Responsibility of Political Parties in the Russian Federation to Electors.

Healy, S. (2003). Epistemological pluralism and the ‘politics of choice’. Futures, 35(7), 689-701. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(03)00022-3

Holtrop, D., Born, M. P., & De Vries, R. E. (2015). Relating the spherical representation of vocational interests to the HEXACO personality model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 89, 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.04.003

Horuzhenko, K.M. (1997). Culturology. Encyclopedic Dictionary. Rostov-on-Don “Feniks”, 639. (In Russian)

Kommers, D. P., & Miller, R. A. (2012). The constitutional jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany. Duke University Press.

Kopylov, V.A. (2002). Information law. M.: Yurist", 427. (In Russian)

Lewerissa, C. M., Artha, R., Chauhan, R., Rajpurohit, N., & Ibrahim, M. H. (2021). The contestious dynamics of politics that occurred in the singular election. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 363-375. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS1.1402

Manullang, S. O. (2021). Understanding of identical politics in the Indonesia local election: critical analysis of political election context literature. International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1), 131-140. https://doi.org/10.31295/ijss.v4n1.1506

Moore, M., & Hamalai, L. (1993). Economic liberalization, political pluralism and business associations in developing countries. World Development, 21(12), 1895-1912. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(93)90065-H

Preobrazhenskaya, A.A. (2013). World. Challenges of the global crisis. France. World economy and international relations, 11, 70-83. (In Russian)

Rinartha, K., Suryasa, W., & Kartika, L. G. S. (2018). Comparative Analysis of String Similarity on Dynamic Query Suggestions. In 2018 Electrical Power, Electronics, Communications, Controls and Informatics Seminar (EECCIS) (pp. 399-404). IEEE.

Rozenfeld, M., & Shajo, A. (2007). The Spread of Liberal Constitutionalism: Exploring the Development of Free Speech Rights in New Democracies. Comparative Constitutional Review, 1, 102-120. (In Russian)

Schelkunov, M. D., Volchkova, O. O., & Krasnov, A. S. (2021). Theological foundations of the political power ontology. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 488-495. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS1.1434

Schendelen, R. V. (2006). Brüssel: Die Champions League des Lobbying. Die Fünfte Gewalt. Lobbyismus in Deutschland. Wiesbaden: VS, 132-162.

Stepanenkov, S.V. (2013). Comparative analysis of the institution of political and functional representation in the United States and Russia in the context of the information revolution. Power. ? 7: 059-062. (In Russian)

Tracey, T. J., & Rounds, J. (1996). The spherical representation of vocational interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 48(1), 3-41. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1996.0002

Tulnev, M. A., Agafonova, N. Y. Y., Krotov, A. V., Kuksin, I. N., & Markhgeym, M. V. (2020). Latin American Experience in Constitutional and Legal Guarantees of Freedom of the Media. Cuestiones Políticas, 37(65).

?uk, P., ?uk, P., & Pluci?ski, P. (2021). Coal basin in Upper Silesia and energy transition in Poland in the context of pandemic: The socio-political diversity of preferences in energy and environmental policy. Resources Policy, 71, 101987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.101987

Zyablyuk, N.G. (2002). Lobbying and the judicial system of the USA / Institute of the USA and Canada RAN. M.: 61. (In Russian)