The methodological conflict between theory and philosophy of law

The conservative legal analysis

https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS3.1680

Authors

  • Sergey S. Shestopal PhD in Legal Sciences, Associate Professor of Law Department, Vladivostok State University Of Economics And Service, Vladivostok, Russia | Postdoctoral researcher European Union Law Department, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Kharkov, Ukraine
  • Elena A. Kazachanskaya Southern Federal University, Rostov na Donu, Russia
  • Svetlana V. Kachurova PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor of Philosophy Department, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Kharkov, Ukraine
  • Evgeniy V. Kachurov PhD in Philosophy, Zhukovsky’s National Aerospace University, Kharkiv Aviation Institute, Kharkov, Ukraine

Keywords:

attack, contemplation, conservative, philosophy, theory, valence

Abstract

The subject of this research is the recently intensified competition in modern jurisprudence of two equally respectable scientific disciplines: philosophy of law and theory of law. The goal is to demarcate the meaning of these concepts. Their ontological status (essential significance) in relation to the existence of the law, the reflection of which they are, is also considered. Based on analysis of the existential criticism of the dominant forms of modern ideology, it is proved that the existing theories of law depend on these forms. A stable tendency in modern philosophy to return legal science to the origins of philosophical knowledge of legal reality is stated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abgrall, R., & Karni, S. (2010). A comment on the computation of non-conservative products. Journal of Computational Physics, 229(8), 2759-2763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2009.12.015

Baranov, P. P., Mamychev, A. Y., Dremliuga, R. I., & Miroshnichenko, O. I. (2021). Legal consciousness and legal culture in the era of total digitalization: Theoretical-methodological and legal-technical problems. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S3), 899-910. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS3.1665

Berkowitz, J., & Ehrhardt, H. (1966). Angular distribution of valence-shell photoelectrons. Physics Letters, 21(5), 531-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9163(66)91287-X

Bonnard, A. (1959). Greek civilization (Vol. 3). Macmillan.

Crucitti, P., Latora, V., Marchiori, M., & Rapisarda, A. (2004). Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Physica A: Statistical mechanics and its applications, 340(1-3), 388-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2004.04.031

Dahl, C. J., & Davidson, R. J. (2019). Mindfulness and the contemplative life: pathways to connection, insight, and purpose. Current opinion in psychology, 28, 60-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.11.007

Gadamer, H. G. (1960). Wahrheit und Methode Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik.

Gangolly, J. S., & Hussein, M. E. (1996). Generally accepted accounting principles: Perspectives from philosophy of law. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 7(4), 383-407. https://doi.org/10.1006/cpac.1996.0042

Giles, M. F., & Rothwell, P. M. (2007). Risk of stroke early after transient ischaemic attack: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Neurology, 6(12), 1063-1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70274-0

Grassl, P., Lundgren, K., & Gylltoft, K. (2002). Concrete in compression: a plasticity theory with a novel hardening law. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 39(20), 5205-5223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00408-0

Guitart-Masip, M., Duzel, E., Dolan, R., & Dayan, P. (2014). Action versus valence in decision making. Trends in cognitive sciences, 18(4), 194-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.01.003

Habermas, J. (1971). Technology and Science as «Ideology».

Hausman, D. M., & a Simon, H. (Eds.). (1994). The philosophy of economics: An anthology. Cambridge University Press.

Hegel, G. V. F. (1990). Philosophy of law./Translated from German. M.: Mysl.

Hegel, G. W. F. (1987). Introduction to the Lectures on the History of Philosophy.Dostoevsky F.M. (2010). Idiot M.

Hegel, G. W. F. (2006). Lectures on the History of Philosophy 1825-6: Greek philosophy (Vol. 2). Oxford University Press.

Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology.

Heidegger, M. (1993). Science and Comprehension. Time and Being. M, 243.

Heidegger, M. (2000). Introduction to metaphysics. Yale University Press.

Heidegger, M. (2002). On time and being. University of Chicago Press.

Heidegger, M., & Der Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie, I. I. (1975). Abteilung, Band 24, Frankfurt a. M.: Vittorio Klostermann.

Heidegger, M., Caputo, J. D., Dostal, R. J., & Dreyfus, H. L. (1993). The cambridge companion to Heidegger. Cambridge University Press.

Hölderlin, F. (1998). Selected poems and fragments. Penguin UK.

Husserl, E. (2000). Logical research. Cartesian reflections. Crisis of European Sciences and transcendental phenomenology. The crisis of European humanity and philosophy. Philosophy as a strict science.

Kyrgiou, M., Koliopoulos, G., Martin-Hirsch, P., Arbyn, M., Prendiville, W., & Paraskevaidis, E. (2006). Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet, 367(9509), 489-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68181-6

Lukach, G. (1987). Molodoi Gegel'i problemy kapitalisticheskogo obshchestva [The Young Hegel and the Problems of the Capitalist Society], trans. by SN Mareev, AG Novokhat'ko und AG Arzakanyan et al.

Marcuse, H. (2013). Reason and revolution. Routledge.

Marmor, A. (2010). Philosophy of law. Princeton University Press.

Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1961). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. The Prozess of Circulation of Capital. Foreign Languages Publishing House.

Nugraha, D. Y., Sudirman, M. I., Rudianto, R., Ferdiansyah, D., Ismail, I., Yani, A., Utami, C., Hajid, M. K., & Syawal, M. P. (2020). Increasing prosocial behavior through caring scout activities. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 6(5), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v6n5.959

Polinsky, A. M., & Shavell, S. (2007). The theory of public enforcement of law. Handbook of law and economics, 1, 403-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0730(07)01006-7

Putrayasa, I. B. (2017). The semantic study of languages politics. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 3(2), 7-13. Retrieved from https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/ijllc/article/view/199

Rinartha, K., & Suryasa, W. (2017). Comparative study for better result on query suggestion of article searching with MySQL pattern matching and Jaccard similarity. In 2017 5th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.

Shestopal, S., Oleynikov, S., & Yakovyuk, I. (2017). Models of the relationship between church, state and political society: Neo-Thomists' arguments. Man in India, 97(23), 499-508.

Sinha, S. P. (1996). Jurisprudence. Legal philosophy. Short course. ?.: Academy.

Uffink, J. (2001). Bluff your way in the second law of thermodynamics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 32(3), 305-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-2198(01)00016-8

Weare, K. (2019). Mindfulness and contemplative approaches in education. Current opinion in psychology, 28, 321-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.001

Yakovyuk, I., & Shestopal, S. (2017). The sovereign rights and sovereignty of the state. Azimuth of scientific research: pedagogy and psychology, 6(4), 21.

Zharovska, I. M., Kovalchuk, V. B., Gren, N. M., Bohiv, Y. S., & Shulhan, I. I. (2021). Age discrimination in modern global society. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S3), 525-538. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS3.1542

Zhukov, V. N. (2009). Philosophy of law (theoretical and methodological aspect). State and law, (3).

Zong, F., & Zhen, S. X. (2021). The link between language and thought. Macrolinguistics and Microlinguistics, 2(1), 12–27. Retrieved from https://mami.nyc/index.php/journal/article/view/12

Published

2021-11-05

How to Cite

Shestopal, S. S., Kazachanskaya, E. A., Kachurova, S. V., & Kachurov, E. V. (2021). The methodological conflict between theory and philosophy of law: The conservative legal analysis. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S3), 1217-1230. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS3.1680

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)