Communicative model as an institutionalization factor for a local self-government in the Russian Federation: By the example of local self-government bodies in the Republic of Tatarstan

Diana Rustеmovna Fatikhova; Elmira Mansurovna Ziiatdinova

doi:10.21744/lingcure.v5nS3.1627

Authors

Diana Rustеmovna Fatikhova
d.fatikhova@gmail.com
Candidate of Sciences (Politology), assistant professor of the department of public relations and applied political science of Kazan (Volga region) Federal University
Elmira Mansurovna Ziiatdinova Candidate of Sciences (Politology), Senior Lecturer of the department of public relations and applied political science of Kazan (Volga region) Federal University

Keywords:

communication models, local self-government bodies, local self-government, political communication, PR-activities of local self-government, press-service

Abstract

The paper investigates the communicative model’s influence on the local self-government development in Russia. The research’s relevance lies in the role of communication in the institutionalization of local government in Russia and is determined by the weakness inherent in local government institutions here. The nature of local self-government in the Russian Federation is contradictory. Local self-government bodies are closely connected with the state power and dependent on it, and at the same time, they are legally excluded from the system of state power bodies. The internal political events of the first half of 2020 indicate a new turn in the development of local self-government in the Russian Federation. According to the amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation adopted following the referendum of July 1, 2020, local self-government and state authorities are part of the unified public authority system in the Russian Federation, while at the same time local self-government bodies may be vested with certain state powers, provided that the material and financial resources necessary for the exercise of such powers are transferred to them. The implementation of the delegated powers to local self-government bodies is controlled by the state.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Androutsopoulou, A., Karacapilidis, N., Loukis, E., & Charalabidis, Y. (2019). Transforming the communication between citizens and government through AI-guided chatbots. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 358-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.10.001

Anna, K., & Nikolay, K. (2015). Survey on big data analytics in public sector of russian federation. Procedia Computer Science, 55, 905-911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.144

Bukhvald, EM, & Valentik, ON (2018). Legal and institutional problems of setting the practice of municipal strategic planning in Russia. Scientific and technical statements of the St. Petersburg State Polytechnic University. Economic Sciences , 11 (2).

Dasih, I. G. A. R. P., Triguna, I. B. G. Y., & Winaja, I. W. (2019). Intercultural communication based on ideology, theology and sociology. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 5(5), 29-35. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v5n5.738

de Vivero, J. L. S. (1995). Atlantic archipelagic regions: self-government and ocean management in the Azores, Madeira and Canary Islands. Ocean & Coastal Management, 27(1-2), 47-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0964-5691(95)00028-3

Ezhevski, D. O. (2015). Local government as one of the constitutional system of the Russian Federation (the modern aspects). ??????? ??????????? ???????????? ?????? ???????. ?????: ??????????? ?????, (3).

Fatykhova, D. R., Ostroumov, A. I., & Ostroumova, O. F. (2017). Modernization of public administration in Russia: issues and judgments. Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication, 766-771.

Froehlich, R., & Rüdiger, B. (2006). Framing political public relations: Measuring success of political communication strategies in Germany. Public Relations Review, 32(1), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.10.003

Gecíková, I., & Papcunová, V. (2014). Using of strategic management tools in conditions of local self-government in Slovakia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 969-978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.943

Gede Budasi, I. & Wayan Suryasa, I. (2021). The cultural view of North Bali community towards Ngidih marriage reflected from its lexicons. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(3), 1484–1497

Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2009). How development leads to democracy: What we know about modernization. Foreign affairs, 33-48.

Lewerissa, C. M., Artha, R., Chauhan, R., Rajpurohit, N., & Ibrahim, M. H. (2021). The contestious dynamics of politics that occurred in the singular election. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 363-375. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS1.1402

Nulty, P., Theocharis, Y., Popa, S. A., Parnet, O., & Benoit, K. (2016). Social media and political communication in the 2014 elections to the European Parliament. Electoral studies, 44, 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.04.014

Odendaal, N. (2003). Information and communication technology and local governance: Understanding the difference between cities in developed and emerging economies. Computers, environment and urban systems, 27(6), 585-607. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0198-9715(03)00016-4

Putrayasa, I. B. (2017). The semantic study of languages politics. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 3(2), 7-13. Retrieved from https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/ijllc/article/view/199

Putrayasa, I. B. (2021). Political language variation: stylistic based study. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v5n1.45

Starshinov, A. N. (2019). Self-Government Bodies In Russia By The Example Of Kazan City (Regulatory Aspect). Revista San Gregorio, (34).

Styrin, E., Mossberger, K., & Zhulin, A. (2021). Government as a platform: Intergovernmental participation for public services in the Russian Federation. Government Information Quarterly, 101627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101627

Vitálišová, K., Murray-Svidro?ová, M., & Jakuš-Muthová, N. (2021). Stakeholder participation in local governance as a key to local strategic development. Cities, 118, 103363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103363

Zhang, L. F. (2005). Validating the theory of mental self-government in a non-academic setting. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(8), 1915-1925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.11.009

Zu, Z. (2021). The right contextual information determining the success of communication on translation. Applied Translation, 15(1), 39–43. Retrieved from https://appliedtranslation.nyc/index.php/journal/article/view/1423