The  analysis of infrastructural support for high-tech development of the domestic economy in the context of neo-industrialization

Y A Doroshenko; I O Malykhina; O V Leonova; A A Rudychev

doi:10.21744/lingcure.v5n1.1616

Authors

Y A Doroshenko
549709@mail.ru
Belgorod State Technological University named after V G Shukhov, Kostyukov St, 46, Belgorod, 308012, Russia
I O Malykhina Belgorod State Technological University named after V G Shukhov, Kostyukov St, 46, Belgorod, 308012, Russia
O V Leonova Belgorod State Technological University named after V G Shukhov, Kostyukov St, 46, Belgorod, 308012, Russia
A A Rudychev Belgorod State Technological University named after V G Shukhov, Kostyukov St, 46, Belgorod, 308012, Russia

Keywords:

domestic economy, high-technology, infrastructural, neo-industrialization

Abstract

Nowadays the high-tech sector plays a key role in economic development. The sector of high-tech and knowledge-intensive production is legally considered as a driver for the development of the domestic economy. However, the boundaries of any development are determined by the resource potential, in which the infrastructure component plays an important role. The search for opportunities to maximize the positive effects of investing in high-tech production in conditions of a total shortage of conditionally free financial resources is actualized by the need to implement the neo-industrial concept of economic development as a response to the challenges of the modern world economic system, which confirms the relevance and determines the purpose of this study. The effectiveness of the innovative component of the economic development of the state is predetermined by the quality of the processes of high-tech and science-intensive production in the context of the need to integrate the new industrial basis of the national economy into the system. This problem primarily affects the level of microeconomic systems that form regional economic systems, which, in turn, determine the pace and quality of development of the national economy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barra Novoa, R. (2021). Institutional Learning and Early Economic Impact Results Obtained by the Network of Business Development Centers in Chile. Available at SSRN 3847824.

De Ruyter, K., Moorman, L., & Lemmink, J. (2001). Antecedents of commitment and trust in customer–supplier relationships in high technology markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 30(3), 271-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(99)00091-7

Eswaran, M., & Kotwal, A. (2002). The role of the service sector in the process of industrialization. Journal of development Economics, 68(2), 401-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(02)00019-6

Fedderke, J. W., Perkins, P., & Luiz, J. M. (2006). Infrastructural investment in long-run economic growth: South Africa 1875–2001. World development, 34(6), 1037-1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.11.004

Frolov, I. E. (2015). Capitalization of Russian science and its effect on productivity and effectiveness of research sector. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 26(3), 205-217.

Kosnikov, S. N., Shershukova, N. V., Sorgutov, I. V., Bessonova, T. V., Kobets, E. A., & Zatsarinnaya, E. I. (2021). Business education: global trends and prospect. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 478-487. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v5nS1.1433

Lazareva, E. I., & Lozovitskaya, D. S. (2020). Econometric evaluation of the scientific and technical progress parameter in the innovative exogenous economic growth model. RUDN Journal of Economics, 28(1), 123-136.

Leonova, T., & Eygel, M. (2013). Institutional Mechanism Of The Innovation Development Of Russian Economy. READINGS BOOK, 532.

Maloyvan, W. W. (2017). The concept of innovation infrastructure: approaches to definition and features.

Maltseva, A.A. (2011). Organizational mechanisms of interaction between the technopark management company and potential investors. Society: politics, economics, law , (4).

Malykhina, I. O., Riapuhina, V. N., Chizhova, E. N., & Roydolskaya, I. V. (2020). Neo-industrialization as the Bases of the Innovative Trajectory of the Development of Russian Industry before and during the Coronavirus Disease-19 Pandemic. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 8(E), 685-692.

Marchenko, E. M, & Rakhova, M. V. (2011). Comprehensive assessment of the innovation infrastructure of the regions of the Central Federal District Economic analysis: theory and practice 24(231) 37-45

Matveeva, L. G., & Chernova, O. A. (2017). Institutional Measures to overcome innovation inertia of peripheral regions in Russia. UPRAVLENETS-THE MANAGER, (5), 2-9.

Mora, M. M., Espinosa, M. R., & Delgado, M. R. (2018). Approach of processes for the distribution of economic resources in public university of ecuador. International research journal of management, IT and social sciences, 5(1), 25-35.

Ngo, V. D., Janssen, F., Leonidou, L. C., & Christodoulides, P. (2016). Domestic institutional attributes as drivers of export performance in an emerging and transition economy. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2911-2922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.060

Nikitaeva, A. Y., & Serdyukov, R. D. (2020). Development of Digital Ecosystems of Industrial Enterprises in the Regions of the South of Russia. Regionalnaya ekonomika. Yug Rossii, 105-117.

Nyandra, M., Kartiko, B.H., Susanto, P.C., Supriyati, A., Suryasa, W. (2018). Education and training improve quality of life and decrease depression score in elderly population. Eurasian Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 13(2), 371-377.

Pack, H. (1988). Industrialization and trade. Handbook of development economics, 1, 333-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4471(88)01012-5

Roehl, R. (1976). French industrialization: a reconsideration. Explorations in Economic History, 13(3), 233-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4983(76)90009-7

Rothaermel, F. T., & Deeds, D. L. (2006). Alliance type, alliance experience and alliance management capability in high-technology ventures. Journal of business venturing, 21(4), 429-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.02.006

Sabodash, O. A., Kalyakina, I. M., Kosnikov, S. N., Elizarova, N. S., Borisov, E. A., & Sorgutov, I. V. (2021). Economics of education and prospects for its development. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 451-459. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v5nS1.1430

Salawu, R. A., & Abdullah, F. (2015). Assessing risk management maturity of construction organisations on infrastructural project delivery in Nigeria. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 643-650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.414

Schmitt-Grohé, S., & Uribe, M. (2003). Closing small open economy models. Journal of international Economics, 61(1), 163-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(02)00056-9

Sokolov, D. S., & Tomilina, N. S. (2016). Innovation infrastructure in modern Russia: the concept, content, features. Innovative science, (1-1), 13.

Tronina, I. A. (2014). Methodology of management of innovative development of integrated systems in high technology sectors: a monograph. Eagle: Federal State budgetary educational institution of higher professional education" State University-UNPK.

Yoon, B., & Park, Y. (2004). A text-mining-based patent network: Analytical tool for high-technology trend. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 15(1), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2003.09.003

Zhurkevich, M.V., Kalinin, A. Yu., & Ladutko, M.M. (2021). Matrix structure of management as a form of organization of innovative processes.