American courtroom discourse

psycholinguistic aspect

https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5n1.1601

Authors

  • Margaryta Zaitseva Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Ukraine
  • Yurii Zatsnyi Zaporizhzhya National University, Ukraine

Keywords:

courtroom discourse, discursive-psychological approach, invective vocabulary, lexical means, phenomenon of transgression, psychological exposure

Abstract

Since the twentieth century, information has become a particularly powerful tool of influence in all realms of human activities. The sender of the speech seeks to influence their recipients by all available means, both lingual and non-lingual. For this reason, we have placed special emphasis on psychological phenomena that help the speech author to succeed in court. One of such seminal psychological phenomena is transgression. Notwithstanding a thorough study of this issue, we have not come across any studies of courtroom discourse dealing with this phenomenon. While exploring the texts of the prosecutors` and defense attorneys` speeches we applied contextual and linguo-stylistic analyses as well as intent and discourse analysis methods.Based on such findings, transgression in courtroom discourse is used simultaneously to erase bounds, on the one hand, and to create hype and epatage, on the other. It is created with the help of lexical means mostly which can be either invective directly or become invective in the context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bataille, G. (2000). Teoriya religii. Literatura i zlo (Theory of Religion. Literature and Evil, in Russian). Minsk: Sovremennyi literator. Retrieved June 20, 2019.

Bell, M. A., & Travis, M. P. (2005). Hybridization, transgressive segregation, genetic covariation, and adaptive radiation. Trends in ecology & evolution, 20(7), 358-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.04.021

Bocheliuk, V. Y., Nechyporenko, V. V., Pozdniakova-Kyrbiatieva, E. H., Pozdniakova, O. L., & Siliavina, Y. S. (2021). Psychological and pedagogical aspects of consolidation of social capital of higher education institutions. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S2), 342-353.

Brent, M. R., & Siskind, J. M. (2001). The role of exposure to isolated words in early vocabulary development. Cognition, 81(2), B33-B44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00122-6

Busygina, N. P. (2010). Diskursivnyj povorot» v psixologicheskix issledovaniyax soznaniya. Konsul'tativnaya psixologiya i psixoterapiya, (1), 55-82.

Chaemsaithong, K., & Kim, Y. (2018). From narration to argumentation: Intertextuality in two courtroom genres. Lingua, 203, 36-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2017.10.003

Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the theory of social behaviour, 20(1), 43-63.

Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology (Vol. 8). Sage.

Faritov, V.T. (2015). Discourse and transgression. Prospects for ontological research. Philosophical Thought , (3), 1-9.

Gray, M. J., Schorr, Y., Nash, W., Lebowitz, L., Amidon, A., Lansing, A., ... & Litz, B. T. (2012). Adaptive disclosure: An open trial of a novel exposure-based intervention for service members with combat-related psychological stress injuries. Behavior therapy, 43(2), 407-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2011.09.001

Harré, R. (2012). Positioning theory: Moral dimensions of social-cultural psychology.

Helling, S. (2021). Casey Anthony Juror Speaks Out 10 Years Later: ‘My Decision Haunts.

Iriani, D. H., Syahdan, .-., & Nuriadi, .-. (2018). The effect of early English learning on psychology: seven years old children. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(1), 65-74.

Kormacheva, D. (2015). What do we get from extracting collocations? Linguistic analysis of automatically obtained Russian MWEs. Journal of Research Design and Statistics in Linguistics and Communication Science, 1(2), 169-189.

Krutova-Soliman, N., Romanenko, N. M., & Shishlova, E. E. (2021). Psychological and pedagogical conditions of integration of immigrants into the German society. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S2), 167-185.

Malyuga, E., & McCarthy, M. (2018). English and Russian vague category markers in business discourse: Linguistic identity aspects. Journal of pragmatics, 135, 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.07.011

McGannon, K. R., McMahon, J., & Gonsalves, C. A. (2017). Mother runners in the blogosphere: A discursive psychological analysis of online recreational athlete identities. Psychology of sport and exercise, 28, 125-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.11.002

Nyandra, M., Suryasa, W. (2018). Holistic approach to help sexual dysfunction. Eurasian Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 13(3), pp. 207–212.

Potter, J. (2003). Discursive psychology: Between method and paradigm. Discourse & Society, 14(6), 783-794.

Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. Sage.

Pufal'-Struzik, I. (2002). Tvorcheskiy put'v" transgressivnoy kontseptsii lichnosti" YA. Kozeletskogo. Psikhol. nauka i obrazovaniye, (2), 75-85.

Razinov, Y. A. (2013). LIE BY OMISSION AND ABILITY TO CONTROL SPEECH. Vestnik of Samara University. History, pedagogics, philology, 19(8/1), 140-144.

Rostovtseva, V. M., & Nizkodubov, G. A. (2020). Pedagogical-hermeneutic approach to the interpretation of the competence phenomenon in modern research. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(2), 57-68.

Roth, W. M. (2008). The nature of scientific conceptions: A discursive psychological perspective. Educational Research Review, 3(1), 30-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.10.002

Schütz, A., & Baumeister, R. F. (1999). The language of defense: linguistic patterns in narratives of transgressions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18(3), 269-286.

Simpson, G. B. (1981). Meaning dominance and semantic context in the processing of lexical ambiguity. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 20(1), 120-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90356-X

Te Molder, H. (2015). Discursive psychology. The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction, 1-11.Moses, A. Dirk (2021). The Language of Transgression, 1890s to 1930s. The Problems of Genocide: Permanent Security and the Language of Transgression, 94-135.

Visoi, M. A. (2014). Transgression, Stylistic Variation and Narrative Discourse in the Twentieth Century Novel. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Whitaker, S. (2013). Intellectual disability: An inability to cope with an intellectually demanding world. Springer.

Wiggins, S. (2004). Talking about taste: Using a discursive psychological approach to examine challenges to food evaluations. Appetite, 43(1), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2004.01.007

Woon, F. L., Sood, S., & Hedges, D. W. (2010). Hippocampal volume deficits associated with exposure to psychological trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder in adults: a meta-analysis. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 34(7), 1181-1188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.06.016

Published

2021-10-25

How to Cite

Zaitseva, M., & Zatsnyi, Y. (2021). American courtroom discourse: psycholinguistic aspect. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(1), 305-317. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5n1.1601

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)