Speech acts found in the text of Cupak and Grantang
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate types of speech acts found in the text of Cupak Grantang. The text of Cupak Grantang is the text that has moral value. The theory of pragmatics in speech acts was used in analyzing the data. The data were collected based on the types of speech acts found in the text of Cupak Grantang. The data were collected based on the problem formulation in the research. Data collection methods and techniques related to types of speech acts and analysis of social context are explained as follows. In the data collection process, the author read, recorded and wrote data related to speech acts and sociopragmatic studies. After obtaining data about the types of speech acts contained in the Cupak and Garantang texts, the types of speech acts were then grouped. The results indicated that the types of illocutionary acts found in the texts are directive, commissive, and assertive. I Cupak was described as a person who always complained about what happened to him.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, H., Mohammad, O. S., Arcelus, J., Amir, S., & Mansoor, A. (2021). Speech act analysis of President Jalal Talabani’s address at the UN general assembly on September 25, 2008. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 252-265.
Aziz, J. A., Mahdi, S., & Amalia, R. M. (2017). Directive illocutionary acts by Mario Teguh in ‘Super Show’talk show: A pragmatics study. Proceedings of AICS-Social Sciences, 7, 605-610.
Björkman, B. (2011). Pragmatic strategies in English as an academic lingua franca: Ways of achieving communicative effectiveness?. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(4), 950-964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.033
Bungin, B. (2007). Analisis data penelitian kualitatif.
Chandler, D. (2007). The Basic Semiotics. London and New York. Routledge. Retrieved April, 23, 2021.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Croddy, W. S. (2002). Performing illocutionary speech acts: an analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(8), 1113-1118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00044-9
Danesi, M. (2004). Messages, signs, and meanings: A basic textbook in semiotics and communication (Vol. 1). Canadian Scholars’ Press.
Ekawati, M. (2019). Tindak Tutur Ekspresif dalam Bahasa Indonesia Kajian Sosiopragmatik (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Gadjah Mada).
Furiassi, C. (2018). Macaroni English goes pragmatic: False phraseological Anglicisms in Italian as illocutionary acts. Journal of Pragmatics, 133, 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.02.009
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. Cole and Morgarn.
Griffiths, P. (2006). An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh University Press.
Hernández, L. P., & de Mendoza, F. J. R. (2002). Grounding, semantic motivation, and conceptual interaction in indirect directive speech acts. Journal of pragmatics, 34(3), 259-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)80002-9
Indonesia, K. B. B. (2008). Kamus besar bahasa Indonesia (KBBI). Balai Pustaka. Jakarta.
Juliarta, I. M. (2021). Prepositional phrase and its translations found in the novel “Budha, a Story of Enlightenment”. EJI (English Journal of Indragiri): Studies in Education, Literature, and Linguistics, 5(1), 28-47.
Kecskes, I. (2000). A cognitive-pragmatic approach to situation-bound utterances. Journal of pragmatics, 32(5), 605-625. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00063-6
Leech, G. N. (1983). Pragmatics, discourse analysis, stylistics and “The Celebrated Letter”.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge UP.
Levinson, S. C. (1991). Pragmatic reduction of the binding conditions revisited. Journal of linguistics, 27(1), 107-161.
Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: an introduction.
Norrick, N. R. (2015). Narrative illocutionary acts direct and indirect. Journal of Pragmatics, 86, 94-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.008
Paltridge, B. (1995). Working with genre: A pragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 24(4), 393-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00058-M
Purwo, B. K. (1990). Pragmatik dan pengajaran bahasa: Menyibak Kurikulum 1984. (No Title).
Putrayasa, I. B. (2014). Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Rahardi, R. K. (2005). Pragmatik: kesantunan imperatif bahasa Indonesia. Erlangga.
Sagita, V. R., & Setiawan, T. (2019). Tindak Tutur Ilokusi Ridwan Kamil dalam Talkshow Insight di CNN Indonesia. Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, Dan Budaya, 9(2), 189-193.
Sbisà, M. (2002). Speech acts in context. Language & Communication, 22(4), 421-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(02)00018-6
Searle, J. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridege University.
Searle, J. R., & Vanderveken, D. (2005). Speech acts and illocutionary logic. In Logic, thought and action (pp. 109-132). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Song, P. (2020). Disagreement-A Speech Act Analysis and Classroom Implications. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture.
Suardana, I. P. E. (2020). Speech Acts Found in the Novel “Snowing in Bali”. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 7(1), 23-31.
Sudaryanto, D. P. (2015). Metode dan aneka teknik analisis Bahasa [Method and technique of language study].
Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan aneka teknik analisis bahasa: Pengantar penelitian wahana kebudayaan secara linguistis (Vol. 64). Duta Wacana University Press.
Sudipa, I. N., Putra, A. A. P., Sudipa, M. H. D., & Nala, M. B. A. (2023). Pragmatic studies on Balinese speech act verbs. Linguistics and Culture Review, 7(1), 95-106.
Sutopo, H.B. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif:Dasar Teori dan Terapannya dalam Penelitian. Surakarta: Sebelas Maret University Press.
Tsoumou, J. M. (2020). Analysing speech acts in politically related Facebook communication. Journal of Pragmatics, 167, 80-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.06.004
Utami, S. W. B. (2015). Makna Asosiatif Pornografi pada Iklan Produk Media Cetak: Kajian Pragmatik (Doctoral dissertation, UNS (Sebelas Maret University)).
Waltereit, R. (2001). Modal particles and their functional equivalents: A speech-act-theoretic approach. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(9), 1391-1417. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00057-6
Widiasri, D. A., Budiarsa, M., Sudipa, I. N., & Satyawati, M. S. (2019). Speech act in Indonesian language teaching: an ethnography communication study. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 5(5), 55-62.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Linguistics and Culture Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
