E-learning moodle

Design and development model of intensive reading

https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS2.2010

Authors

  • Estika Satriani Doctor Program of Language Teacher Science, Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
  • M. Zaim Doctor Program of Language Teacher Science, Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
  • Ermanto Doctor Program of Language Teacher Science, Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia

Keywords:

design, development, e-learning, intensive reading, moodle

Abstract

The development of the Intensive Reading learning process with e-learning Moodle is a focus of attention in this study. The main purpose is to find out the effectiveness, practicality, and feasibility of e-learning Moodle that has been designed in the process of learning. The instructional model of ADDIE was the basis for this development research which involves Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation. Twenty-eight students who joined the intensive reading class and eight validators who were experts in their fields became trial participants in this study. The feasibility of e-learning Moodle was validated by an evaluation sheet that was completed by six validators, who were experts in their field such as learning- media, material, and process. Furthermore, the acquisition of data from students' questionnaires becomes the main data in determining of effectiveness and practicality of the e-learning Moodle. The study indicated that learning model produced can be acceptable and eligible categories, including layout, navigation, function, and pedagogical areas. Based on the students’ answers related to the use of e-learning Moodle of Intensive reading class, it depicts to be effective and practice in all aspects of the evaluation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aiken, L. R. (1980). Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires. Educational and psychological measurement, 40(4), 955-959.

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and psychological measurement, 45(1), 131-142.

Akkoyunlu, B., & Soylu, M. Y. (2008). A study of student's perceptions in a blended learning environment based on different learning styles. Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 183–193.

Aldoobie, N. (2015). ADDIE model. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 5(6), 68-72.

Alier, M. F., Guerrero, M. J. C., Gonzalez, M. A. C., Penalvo, F. J. G., & Severance, C. (2010). Interoperability for LMS: the missing piece to become the common place for e-learning innovation. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 6(2-3), 130-141.

Assareh, A., & Bidokht, M. H. (2011). Barriers to e-teaching and e-learning. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 791-795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.129

Carrell, P. L., & Carson, J. G. (1997). Extensive and intensive reading in an EAP setting. English for specific purposes, 16(1), 47-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00031-2

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th Edn.). Abingdon, Oxon.

Czichos, H., & Saito, T. (2006). Springer handbook of materials measurement methods (Vol. 978, pp. 399-429). L. Smith (Ed.). Berlin: Springer.

Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’and its application. Design studies, 32(6), 521-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006

Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution. Design studies, 22(5), 425-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00009-6

Galy, E., Downey, C., & Johnson, J. (2011). The effect of using e-learning tools in online and campus-based classrooms on student performance. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 10(1), 209-230.

Ghirardini, B. (2011). E-learning methodologies: A guide for designing and developing e-learning courses. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Grigorievna, B. T., Alekseevna, P. N., & Sotnikova, L. V. (2021). Distance learning as a strategic channel for the development of tutoring services. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 529-537. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS1.1437

Hameed, S., Badii, A., & Cullen, A. J. (2008). Effective e-learning integration with traditional learning in a blended learning environment. In European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (Vol. 60, p. 14).

Harandi, S. R. (2015). Effects of e-learning on Students’ Motivation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 181, 423-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.905

Horton, W., & Horton, K. (2003). E-learning Tools and Technologies: A consumer's guide for trainers, teachers, educators, and instructional designers. John Wiley & Sons.

Ismail, J. (2001). The design of an e-learning system: Beyond the hype. The internet and higher education, 4(3-4), 329-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00069-0

Joyce, B. & Weil, M. (1980). Models of Teaching (Second Edition).

Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2003). Models of teaching.

Korucu, A. T., & Alkan, A. (2011). Differences between m-learning (mobile learning) and e-learning, basic terminology and usage of m-learning in education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1925-1930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.029

Kowsalya, D. N., Venkat Lakshmi, H., & Suresh, K. P. (2012). Development and Validation of a Scale to assess Self-Concept in Mild Intellectually Disabled Children. International Journal of Social Sciences & Education, 2(4).

Lee, J., & Martin, L. (2017). Investigating students’ perceptions of motivating factors of online class discussions. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning: IRRODL, 18(5), 148-172.

Mahrlamova, K., & Chabanovych, N. (2021). Implementation of interactive methodology in medical education: Blended learning approach, e-learning vs conventional learning. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S4), 1154-1160. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS4.1752

Martin, F., Parker, M. A., & Deale, D. F. (2012). Examining interactivity in synchronous virtual classrooms. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(3), 227-261.

Martín-Blas, T., & Serrano-Fernández, A. (2009). The role of new technologies in the learning process: Moodle as a teaching tool in Physics. Computers & Education, 52(1), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.005

Mason, B., & Krashen, S. (1997). Extensive reading in English as a foreign language. System, 25(1), 91-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(96)00063-2

Mehrabi, J., & sadat Abtahi, M. (2012). RETRACTED: Teaching with Moodle in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.819

Menaka, G., & Sankar, G. (2019). The language learning assessment using technology for the second language learners. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 5(4), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v5n4.674

Oproiu, G. C. (2015). A study about using e-learning platform (Moodle) in university teaching process. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 426-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.140

Panyajamorn, T., Suanmali, S., Kohda, Y., Chongphaisal, P., & Supnithi, T. (2018). Effectiveness of E-Learning Design in Thai Public Schools. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 15(1), 1-34.

Rinartha, K., Suryasa, W., & Kartika, L. G. S. (2018). Comparative Analysis of String Similarity on Dynamic Query Suggestions. In 2018 Electrical Power, Electronics, Communications, Controls and Informatics Seminar (EECCIS) (pp. 399-404). IEEE.

Sabilah, F. (2016). Teaching techniques and instructional media in presenting intercultural awareness in English class of primary school students. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 2(4), 112-121.

Saeed, F. A. (2013). Comparing and evaluating open source e-learning platforms. International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering (IJSCE), 3(3), 244-249.

Siah Sim Tee, T. S. M. T. W., & Zainudin, S. (2013). User testing for moodle application. International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications, 7(5), 243-252.

Thapliyal, U. (2014). Perceived quality dimensions in distance education: Excerpts from student experiences. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), 60-67.

Walker, D. F., & Hess, R. D. (1984). Evaluation in courseware development. Instructional software: Principles and perspectives for design and use, 204-215.

Published

2021-12-24

How to Cite

Satriani, E., Zaim, M., & Ermanto, E. (2021). E-learning moodle: Design and development model of intensive reading. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S2), 1521-1532. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS2.2010

Issue

Section

Research Articles