Gaps, conflicts and contradictions regarding measures to ensure the right to a fair trial of the convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms

https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS4.1856

Authors

  • Ganna Sobko Odesa State University of Internal Affairs, Odesa, Ukraine
  • Galyna Muliar Academy of Labor, Social Relations and Tourism, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Ivan Draliuk National Academy of Security Service of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Myroslav Hryhorchuk “KROK” University, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Oleksandr Holovko V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine
  • Ielyzaveta Lvova Odessa University of Internal Affairs, Odesa, Ukraine

Keywords:

European court, fair trial, human freedom, human rights, protection human rights

Abstract

The first paragraph of Article 6 states that the right to a fair trial is when everyone has the right to a fair and impartial hearing in a court of law within a reasonable time, independently of the law governing the dispute over his rights and obligations. both civil and other (criminal, administrative) nature and the establishment of the accusation against her. The court decision must be made public, but the press and the public may not be allowed in the courtroom during the entire time the case is heard in court or only part of the hearing in the interests of a democratic society, namely morality, public order, national security, and this is required by the interests of the juvenile or the protection of the privacy of individuals, or, if the Court has found the measure necessary, when, in special circumstances, the publicity of the proceedings may be prejudicial to the interests of justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Article the right to a fair trial (1997). Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

Borisov, V.I. (2004). The Law of Ukraine on Criminal Liability: Concept, Functions and Sources. Moscow: Criminal law: development strategy in the XXI century. 434 – 437

Constitutional Court of Ukraine. (2020). A separate opinion of the judge of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine Horodovenko V.V. concerning the Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the case on the constitutional petition of 55 people's deputies of Ukraine on compliance of the Constitution of Ukraine (constitutionality) with Article 375 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.

Cross, F. B. (1999). The relevance of law in human rights protection. International Review of Law and Economics, 19(1), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8188(98)00028-3

Csete, J., & Elliott, R. (2021). Consumer protection in drug policy: The human rights case for safe supply as an element of harm reduction. International Journal of Drug Policy, 91, 102976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102976

Decision of the constitutional court of Ukraine. (2019). Case No. 1-305 / 2019 (7162/19) in the case of the constitutional petition of 55 people's deputies of Ukraine on the compliance of the Constitution of Ukraine (constitutionality) with Article 375 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.

Denysova, A. V., Blaga, A. B., Makovii, V. P., & Kaliuzhna, Y. S. (2021). The right to a justice court: implementation of the practice of the European Court of human rights in the Ukrainian judiciary. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S4), 1707-1722. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS4.1852

Draft law of Ukraine. (2018). About modification of some legislative acts of Ukraine concerning improvement of separate norms for the purpose of inevitability of punishment of the persons who have committed corruption crimes.

Drew, N., Funk, M., Tang, S., Lamichhane, J., Chávez, E., Katontoka, S., ... & Saraceno, B. (2011). Human rights violations of people with mental and psychosocial disabilities: an unresolved global crisis. The Lancet, 378(9803), 1664-1675. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61458-X

Explanatory note. (2018). Draft law of Ukraine about modification of some legislative acts of Ukraine concerning improvement of separate norms for the purpose of inevitability of punishment of the persons who have committed corruption crimes.

Gbaguidi, C., & Allagbe, A. M. (2018). African social appraisals of women’s liberal and radical feminism in selected contemporary West and Central African female and male novels. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 4(6), 42-52. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v4n6.374

Giglio, E. D. (1982). Free press-fair trial in Britain and America. Journal of Criminal Justice, 10(5), 341-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(82)90018-6

Gokalp, N. (2012). Philosophy education and human freedom. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 477-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.683

Gruskin, S., Mills, E. J., & Tarantola, D. (2007). History, principles, and practice of health and human rights. The Lancet, 370(9585), 449-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61200-8

Hamilton, A., Madison, J., & Federalis, J. (2002). Commentary on the Constitution of the United States. Kyiv: Sfera, 490 p.

Haustova, M.G. (2015). Implementation of European legal standards in the legal system of Ukraine. In Current issues of modern international law.

Law of Ukraine (2019). About modification of some legislative acts of Ukraine concerning simplification of pre-judicial investigation of separate categories of criminal offenses.

Law of Ukraine (2020). About modification of some legislative acts of Ukraine concerning improvement of procedure of modification.

Law of Ukraine. (2015). About modification of the Criminal code of Ukraine concerning improvement of institute of special confiscation for the purpose of elimination of corruption risks at its application.

Parker, M. (2013). Defending the indefensible? Psychiatry, assisted suicide and human freedom. International journal of law and psychiatry, 36(5-6), 485-497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.06.007

Rinartha, K., Suryasa, W., & Kartika, L. G. S. (2018). Comparative Analysis of String Similarity on Dynamic Query Suggestions. In 2018 Electrical Power, Electronics, Communications, Controls and Informatics Seminar (EECCIS) (pp. 399-404). IEEE.

The case of Yeloyev v. Ukraine (2008). Application no. 17283/02.

The right to a fair trial (2013). § 3 of the Annex to the Recommendation.

Titko, E., Kurovska, I., Korniienko, P., Balzhyk, I. A., & Stoyatska, G. M. (2021). Military-civil interaction through the prism of human rights protection: the experience of the ECtHR. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S3), 649-666. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS3.1550

Tridimas, G., & Tridimas, T. (2004). National courts and the European Court of Justice: a public choice analysis of the preliminary reference procedure. International review of Law and Economics, 24(2), 125-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2004.08.003

van Der Sloot, B. (2018). A new approach to the right to privacy, or how the European Court of Human Rights embraced the non-domination principle. Computer law & security review, 34(3), 539-549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2017.11.013

Venice commission (2011a). Item 41 European commission "For democracy through law".

Venice commission (2011b). Item 46 European commission "For democracy through law".

Verbeke, P., Vermeulen, G., Meysman, M., & Vander Beken, T. (2015). Protecting the fair trial rights of mentally disordered defendants in criminal proceedings: Exploring the need for further EU action. International journal of law and psychiatry, 41, 67-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.03.009

Published

2021-11-29

How to Cite

Sobko, G., Muliar, G., Draliuk, I., Hryhorchuk, M., Holovko, O., & Lvova, I. (2021). Gaps, conflicts and contradictions regarding measures to ensure the right to a fair trial of the convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S4), 1968-1984. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS4.1856

Issue

Section

Research Articles