The right to a justice court: implementation of the practice of the European Court of human rights in the Ukrainian judiciary

https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS4.1852

Authors

  • Alina V. Denysova Odesa State University of Internal Affairs, Odesa, Ukraine
  • Alla B. Blaga Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University, Mykolaiv, Ukraine
  • Viktor P. Makovii Odesa State University of Internal Affairs, Odesa, Ukraine
  • Yevheniia S. Kaliuzhna Odesa State University of Internal Affairs, Odesa, Ukraine

Keywords:

fair trial, impartiality, independence, legal certainty, rule law

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to reveal the content of the right to a fair trial and the state of its provision in Ukraine through the prism of court decisions of Ukrainian courts of various instances and the relevant practice of the European Court of Human Rights. The methodological basis of the study is a set of philosophical and ideological, general and special scientific methods and techniques of scientific knowledge, including dialectical, systemic, structural and functional methods, as well as methods of analysis and synthesis. It is identified that the right to a fair trial in legal science, judicial practice is considered in its constituent elements and relevant manifestations, including fairness and publicity of the trial, compliance with the signs of independence, impartiality, legality, observance of the rule of law, equality of participants, and proceedings within reasonable time limits. Each of the elements, mentioned and features of the right to a fair trial is subject to appropriate interpretation in the context of the relevant decisions of the European Court of Human Rights during the review of case materials in national courts of the signatory states to the Convention.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Balboni, P., Pelino, E., & Scudiero, L. (2014). Rethinking the one-stop-shop mechanism: Legal certainty and legitimate expectation. Computer law & security review, 30(4), 392-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2014.05.007

Baranov, P. P., Mamychev, A. Y., Dremliuga, R. I., & Miroshnichenko, O. I. (2021). Legal consciousness and legal culture in the era of total digitalization: Theoretical-methodological and legal-technical problems. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S3), 899-910. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS3.1665

Besedkina, N. I., Gushchin, V. V., Kallagov, T. E., Larina, T. V., & Makarchuk, Z. V. (2021). Categories of reasonableness and good faith in private law regulation. Laplage em Revista, 7(3A), 60-66.

Buitelaar, E., & Sorel, N. (2010). Between the rule of law and the quest for control: Legal certainty in the Dutch planning system. Land Use Policy, 27(3), 983-989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.01.002

Callejas, A., Lupiánez, J., & Tudela, P. (2004). The three attentional networks: On their independence and interactions. Brain and cognition, 54(3), 225-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.012

Coblentz, W. K., & Warshaw, R. S. (1956). European convention for the Protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. Calif. L. Rev., 44, 94.

Drozd, O., Dorokhina, Y., Leheza, Y., Smokovych, M., & Zadyraka, N. (2021). Cassation filters in administrative judicial procedure: a step in a chasm or a novel that ukrainian society expected?. Amazonia Investiga, 10(40), 222-232.

Ebbesson, J. (2010). The rule of law in governance of complex socio-ecological changes. Global Environmental Change, 20(3), 414-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.10.009

ECHR. (1970). Case of Delcourt v. Belgium. Application no. 2689/65.

ECHR. (1978). Case of König v. Germany. Application no. 6232/73.

ECHR. (1995). Case of S.W. v. the United Kingdom. Application no. 20166/92.

ECHR. (1996). Case of Cantoni v. France. Application no. 17862/91.

ECHR. (1996). Case of Pullar v. United Kingdom. Application no. 22399/93.

ECHR. (1999). Case of Brum?rescu v. Romania. Application no. 28342/95.

ECHR. (1999). Case of Garcia Ruiz v. Spain. Application no. 30544/96.

ECHR. (1999). Case of Pellegrin v. France. Application no. 28541/95.

ECHR. (2000). Case of Miragall Escolano v. Spain. Application nos. 38366/97, 38688/97, 40777/98, 40843/98, 41015/98, 41400/98, 41446/98, 41484/98, 41487/98 and 41509/98.

ECHR. (2001). Case of Dombo Beer v. Austria. Application no. 30428/96. ECHR. (2001). Case of Kreuz v. Poland. Application no. 28249/95.

ECHR. (2003). Case of Kleyn and Others v. the Netherlands. Application no. 39343/98, 39651/98, 43147/98 and 46664/99.

ECHR. (2003). Case of Ryabykh v. Russia. Application no. 52584/99.

ECHR. (2008). Case of C.G. and ?thers v. Bulgaria. Application no. 1365/07.

ECHR. (2009). Case of Ryabykh v. Russia. Application no. 8269/02.

ECHR. (2011). Case of Agrokompleks v. Ukraine. Application no. 23465/03.

ECHR. (2011). M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece. Application no. 30696/09.

ECHR. (2016). Case of Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others v. Romania. Application no. 76943/11.

Kachalova, O.V. & Kachalov, V.L. (2019). The right to a fair trial and a special procedure: Is there a conflict? Tomsk State University Journal, 445, 197-202.

Licht, A. N., Goldschmidt, C., & Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Culture rules: The foundations of the rule of law and other norms of governance. Journal of comparative economics, 35(4), 659-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2007.09.001

Luts, V. V. (2013). Terms and data in civil law. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter.

Marycheva, O., Kucher, V., Kurylo, T., Demkiv, R., & Grabar, N. (2021). Peculiarities of using information technologies through the prism of the principles of civil proceedings. Amazonia Investiga, 10(44), 220-229.

Niveau, G., Godet, T., & Völlm, B. (2019). What does impartiality mean in medico-legal psychiatry? An international survey. International journal of law and psychiatry, 66, 101505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101505

Nugraha, D. Y., Sudirman, M. I., Rudianto, R., Ferdiansyah, D., Ismail, I., Yani, A., Utami, C., Hajid, M. K., & Syawal, M. P. (2020). Increasing prosocial behavior through caring scout activities. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 6(5), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v6n5.959

Prytyka, Y., & Kravtsov, S. (2019). Review of Court Decisions:¿ Does Ukraine Guarantee the Right to a Fair Trial in Appeal?. Amazonia Investiga, 8(23), 685-692.

Putrayasa, I. B. (2017). The semantic study of languages politics. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 3(2), 7-13. Retrieved from https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/ijllc/article/view/199

Rada, V. (1997). On Local Self-Government in Ukraine.

Rada, V. (2003). The Law of Ukraine on the Fundamentals of National Security of Ukraine of 19.06. 2003.

Rada, V. (2006). Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine: Official Web-Site. Date Accessed: May.

Ramadani, S., Danil, E., Sabri, F., & Zurnetti, A. (2021). Criminal law politics on regulation of criminal actions in Indonesia. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 1373-1380. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS1.1651

Roberts, M. L. (2010). Independence, impartiality, and advocacy in client conflicts. Research in Accounting Regulation, 22(1), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.racreg.2009.11.001

Rodrigo, S. G. (2019). The right to a fair trial in the European Union: lights and shadows. Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, 2, 07-29.

Romovska, Z. (2005). Ukrainian Civil Law: General Part. Kyiv: Attica. In https://www. twirpx. com/file/448890.

Sabbi, L. (2018). Country note: The Reasonable Time of Tax Proceedings in the Italian Legal System. Intertax, 46(6/7).

Sarin, D. (2015). Right to Access to Court in Jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights. Pravni Vjesnik, 31, 267.

Stineman, M. G., Jette, A., Fiedler, R., & Granger, C. (1997). Impairment-specific dimensions within the Functional Independence Measure. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78(6), 636-643. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90430-5

Sun, J., Zhong, H., Wang, K., Li, N., & Chen, L. (2021). Gains from no real PAINS: Where ‘Fair Trial Strategy’stands in the development of multi-target ligands. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2021.02.023

Suwija, N., Suarta, M., Suparsa, N., Alit Geria, A.A.G., Suryasa, W. (2019). Balinese speech system towards speaker social behavior. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(5), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.754

Suzdaltseva, T. I. (2015). Grounds for the right to compensation for violation of the right to a fair trial within a reasonable time or the right to execute a judicial act within a reasonable time. Tomsk State University Journal, 395, 155-159.

Tanwete, C. S., & Kombinda, N. (2020). Object of study and linguistic subdisciplinary. Macrolinguistics and Microlinguistics, 1(1), 23–36. Retrieved from https://mami.nyc/index.php/journal/article/view/3

Trochev, A. (2003). Ukraine: Constitutional court invalidates ban on Communist Party. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 1(3), 534-540.

Verbeke, P., Vermeulen, G., Meysman, M., & Vander Beken, T. (2015). Protecting the fair trial rights of mentally disordered defendants in criminal proceedings: Exploring the need for further EU action. International journal of law and psychiatry, 41, 67-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.03.009

Published

2021-11-23

How to Cite

Denysova, A. V., Blaga, A. B., Makovii, V. P., & Kaliuzhna, Y. S. (2021). The right to a justice court: implementation of the practice of the European Court of human rights in the Ukrainian judiciary. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S4), 1707-1722. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS4.1852

Issue

Section

Research Articles