The use of interactive methods in teaching professional speech to students

https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS2.1801

Authors

  • Akhmedova Mukaddas Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, National University of Uzbekistan, Uzbekistan
  • Dilmurodova Nilufar Associate Professor, Tashkent Financial Institute, Uzbekistan

Keywords:

cognition process, communication, interactive method, joint activity, learning, speech skills

Abstract

Interactive teaching methods provide solutions to educational problems in various aspects. The use of interactive methods allows you to organize independent cognitive activity of students during the lesson. Possession of interactive learning technology and its use in the educational process will undoubtedly contribute to the development of students' qualities that correspond to the processes taking place in life today. This paper presents the technologies of conducting Uzbek language lessons using interactive methods and their significance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bolotov V. (2002). Psychology of creative abilities: Academy.

Dyachenko, V.K. (1991). Cooperation in teaching: About the collective method of educational work: A book for a teacher. Enlightenment.

Fan, Y., & Khattak, A. J. (2009). Does urban form matter in solo and joint activity engagement?. Landscape and urban planning, 92(3-4), 199-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.05.006

Ginaya, G., Kanca, I. N., & Sri Astuti, N. N. (2021). Collaborative network learning (CNL) on students’ online learning. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 7(5), 362-370. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v7n5.1923

Hadjielias, E., Dada, O. L., Cruz, A. D., Zekas, S., Christofi, M., & Sakka, G. (2021). How do digital innovation teams function? Understanding the team cognition-process nexus within the context of digital transformation. Journal of Business Research, 122, 373-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.045

Hänze, M., & Berger, R. (2007). Cooperative learning, motivational effects, and student characteristics: An experimental study comparing cooperative learning and direct instruction in 12th grade physics classes. Learning and instruction, 17(1), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.11.004

Husin, M. R., Shaffeei, K., Ahmad, H., & Shuib, T. R. (2021). Companion teacher based on sociological stimulus during learning to improves the acceptance of inclusive education pupils in receiving skills and information. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 1138-1148. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS1.1500

Kokorina, L. V., Potreba, N. A., Zharykova, M. V., & Horlova, O. V. (2021). Distance learning tools for the development of foreign language communicative competence. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S4), 1016-1034. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS4.1738

Lun, D. S., Médard, M., Koetter, R., & Effros, M. (2008). On coding for reliable communication over packet networks. Physical Communication, 1(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phycom.2008.01.006

Mills, G. J. (2014). Dialogue in joint activity: Complementarity, convergence and conventionalization. New ideas in psychology, 32, 158-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.03.006

Pezzulo, G., & Cisek, P. (2016). Navigating the affordance landscape: feedback control as a process model of behavior and cognition. Trends in cognitive sciences, 20(6), 414-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.013

Pirila, S., van der Meere, J., Pentikainen, T., Ruusu-Niemi, P., Korpela, R., Kilpinen, J., & Nieminen, P. (2007). Language and motor speech skills in children with cerebral palsy. Journal of communication disorders, 40(2), 116-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2006.06.002

Polat, E.S. (2015). Technology of learning in cooperation.

Pratiwi, V. U., & Rohmadi, M. (2021). Pragmatic approach to Indonesian speaking skills for student vocational high schools. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 7(4), 263-273. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v7n4.1795

Ryan, E. B., Giles, H., Bartolucci, G., & Henwood, K. (1986). Psycholinguistic and social psychological components of communication by and with the elderly. Language & Communication, 6(1-2), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(86)90002-9

Seufert, T. (2003). Supporting coherence formation in learning from multiple representations. Learning and instruction, 13(2), 227-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00022-1

Su, Z. X., Chen, M. Y., Xia, G. P., & Wang, L. (2011). An interactive method for dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(12), 15286-15295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.022

Talosa, A. D., Javier, B. S., & Dirain, E. L. (2021). The flexible-learning journey: phenomenological investigation of self-efficacy influencing factors among higher education students. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S3), 422-434. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS3.1590

Whiteside, S. P., Dobbin, R., & Henry, L. (2003). Patterns of variability in voice onset time: A developmental study of motor speech skills in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 347(1), 29-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00598-6

Widana, I.K., Dewi, G.A.O.C., Suryasa, W. (2020). Ergonomics approach to improve student concentration on learning process of professional ethics. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 12(7), 429-445.

Xu, Z. S., & Chen, J. (2007). An interactive method for fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making. Information Sciences, 177(1), 248-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2006.03.001

Published

2021-11-18

How to Cite

Mukaddas, A., & Nilufar, D. (2021). The use of interactive methods in teaching professional speech to students. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S2), 1122-1130. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS2.1801

Issue

Section

Research Articles