Discourse of Indonesian language in public domain: its use in public debate prior to the presidential election 2019

https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS1.1477

Authors

Keywords:

language, motivation, personality, politeness

Abstract

This paper discusses the use of Indonesian language in the public domain, especially in public debate. It aims to give readers an understanding of its use in the public debate before the presidential election 2019, which has worried the people. The use of Indonesian through lexical choices that contain slander, incitement, and hate speech can threaten the nation's unity. Therefore, the issues discussed are: (1) What is the thing behind using the language having negative meaning? (2) What is the impact on the personal development of the nation? (3) How to avoid using language that is not following our national identity? These three research questions are discussed using deconstruction and ethnography of speaking methods. By applying these two methods, the results show that the speakers with a particular 'motivation' have created and developed a new system of deviation along with the hope that they can play the ‘language market’, the value of language production making one’s position that he is right and tries to influent people in order to believe in perception he has built.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aji, G. B. (2018). “Langkah Maju Jokowi”. Kompas, Harian Nasional.

Bagus, I. G. N., Koentjaraningrat, R. M., & Teeuw, A. (1979). Perubahan pemakaian bentuk hormat dalam masyarakat Bali sebuah pendekatan etnografi berhasa.

Borris, D. ., & Zecho, C. . (2018). The linguistic politeness having seen on the current study issue. Linguistics and Culture Review, 2(1), 32-44. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v2n1.10

Calhoun, C., LiPuma, E., & Postone, M. (1993). Bourdieu: critical perspectives. University of Chicago Press.

Cargile, A. C., Giles, H., Ryan, E. B., & Bradac, J. J. (1994). Language attitudes as a social process: A conceptual model and new directions. Language & Communication, 14(3), 211-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(94)90001-9

Chen, R. (2001). Self-politeness: A proposal. Journal of pragmatics, 33(1), 87-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00124-1

Daskalovska, N., Gudeva, L. K., & Ivanovska, B. (2012). Learner motivation and interest. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1187-1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.272

Derrida, J. (2008). The animal that therefore I am. Fordham Univ Press.

Duranti, A. (2011). Linguistic anthropology: Language as a non-neutral medium. The Cambridge handbook of sociolinguistics, 28-46.

Foley, W. A. (1997). Anthropological linguistics: An introduction. Wiley-Blackwell.

Foucault, M. (2002). Wacana kuasa/pengetahuan. Yogyakarta: Bentang Budaya.

Foucault, M. (2002). Arkeologi Pengetahuan. BASABASI.

Furnham, A., & Fenton-O'Creevy, M. (2018). Personality and political orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 129, 88-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.020

Geertz, C. (1974). 1977.“From the native’s point of view”: On the nature of anthropological understanding. Symbolic anthropology: A reader, 480-492.

Geertz, C. (1975). On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding: Not extraordinary empathy but readily observable symbolic forms enable the anthropologist to grasp the unarticulated concepts that inform the lives and cultures of other peoples. American scientist, 63(1), 47-53.

Gonda, J. (1948). The Javanese vocabulary of courtesy. Lingua, 1(3), 333-76.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective.

Harris, M. (1991). Cultural anthropology.

Hartono, H., Suparto, S., & Hassan, A. (2021). Language: a ‘mirror’ of the culture and its application English language teaching. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(1), 93-103. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v5n1.835

Hermann, J. (2008). The ‘language’problem. Language & Communication, 28(1), 93-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2007.08.001

Kasper, G. (1990). Linguistic politeness:: Current research issues. Journal of pragmatics, 14(2), 193-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90080-W

Kersten, J. (1984). Bahasa Bali: Tata bahasa dan kamus lumrah.

Laksana, I. K. D. (2009). Tabu Bahasa: Salah Satu Cara Memahami Kebudayaan Bali. Udayana University Press.

Latupeirissa, D. S., Laksana, I. K. D., Artawa, K., & Sosiowati, I. G. A. G. (2019). On political language ideology: Critical view of Indonesian president speech. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(4), 843-850.

Love, N. (2004). Cognition and the language myth. Language sciences, 26(6), 525-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2004.09.003

Lubis, A. Y. (2014). Postmodernisme: teori dan metode. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2000). A motivated exploration of motivation terminology. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 3-53. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1019

Poedjosoedarmo, G. R. (1986). Role structure in Javanese (Vol. 24). Universitas Atma Jaya.

Salzmann, Z., Stanlaw, J., & Adachi, N. (2014). Language, culture, and society: An introduction to linguistic anthropology. Westview Press.

Saussure, F. D. (1988). Pengantar linguistik umum. Terj. Rahayu S. Hidayat. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University.

Sifianou, M. (2012). Disagreements, face and politeness. Journal of pragmatics, 44(12), 1554-1564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.009

Sim, S., & Van Loon, B. (2008). Mengenal Teori Kritis. Yogyakarta: Resist Book.

Tinggen, I. N. (1995). Sor singgih basa Bali: istilah Indonesia-Bali. Rhika Dewata.

Torgersen, S., Lygren, S., Øien, P. A., Skre, I., Onstad, S., Edvardsen, J., ... & Kringlen, E. (2000). A twin study of personality disorders. Comprehensive psychiatry, 41(6), 416-425. https://doi.org/10.1053/comp.2000.16560

Wardhaugh, R., & Fuller, J. M. (2021). An introduction to sociolinguistics. John Wiley & Sons.

Zoetmulder, P. J., & Hartoko, D. (1983). Kalangwan: Sastra Jawa Kuno Selayang Pandang. Djambatan.

Published

2021-09-21

How to Cite

Laksana, I. K. D. (2021). Discourse of Indonesian language in public domain: its use in public debate prior to the presidential election 2019. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 922-934. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS1.1477

Issue

Section

Research Articles