Implementation of population administration services in Tuban district

Nany Suryawati

doi:10.21744/lingcure.v5nS1.1457

Authors

Nany Suryawati
nany.suryawati@ukdc.ac.id
Darma Cendika Catholic University Surabaya, Indonesia

Keywords:

administration service, implementation, literature studies, population

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to provide public administration services, namely: (1). Meet every resident in public service (2). Increase the awareness of the population to fulfill the population (3). Implement development policies. Methods: This research uses a qualitative approach, data collection techniques are: interviews, site surveys, documentation and literature studies. Conclusion: (1). The administration of sub-district government in population administration services in Tuban Regency has been in accordance with Indonesian Law No. 23 of 2006 (2). Settlement of Population administration problems, involving related elements and can be resolved in accordance with population regulations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, R. (2002). Pelaksanaan Otonomi Luas dan Isu Federalisme Sebagai Suatu Alternatif. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Agussalim, A. G. (2007). Pemerintahan Daerah (kajian politik dan hukum). Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Arundel, A. (2017). Rethinking the effect of risk aversion on the benefits of service innovations in public administration agencies. Research Policy, 46(5), 900-910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.03.009

Beasley, M. S., Clune, R., & Hermanson, D. R. (2005). Enterprise risk management: An empirical analysis of factors associated with the extent of implementation. Journal of accounting and public policy, 24(6), 521-531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.10.001

Beratha, I. N. (1992). Desa, Masyarakat Desa dan Pembangunan. Ghalia Indonesia.

Bonnefoy-Claudet, S., Cotton, F., & Bard, P. Y. (2006). The nature of noise wavefield and its applications for site effects studies: A literature review. Earth-Science Reviews, 79(3-4), 205-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2006.07.004

Burke, L. E., Wang, J., & Sevick, M. A. (2011). Self-monitoring in weight loss: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 111(1), 92-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2010.10.008

Gilbert, C. (2008). Retinopathy of prematurity: a global perspective of the epidemics, population of babies at risk and implications for control. Early human development, 84(2), 77-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.11.009

Gulo, W. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian, Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

Hales, S., De Wet, N., Maindonald, J., & Woodward, A. (2002). Potential effect of population and climate changes on global distribution of dengue fever: an empirical model. The Lancet, 360(9336), 830-834. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09964-6

Hanif Nurcholis, M. (2013). Dua Ratus Tahun Praktik Demokrasi Desa: Potret Kegagalan Adopsi Demokrasi Barat Oleh Bangsa Indonesia1.

Jaweng, R. E. (2012). RUU Tentang Desa: Kritik atas Proposal Minimalisasi Versi Pemerintah. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, MIPI, Edisi, 38.

Jones, P., & Manthorpe, J. (2002). Setting standards and enhancing choices. Journal of Integrated Care.

Khamdun, K., Suparmi, S., Maridi, M., & Rusilowati, A. (2021). Development of vocational science learning devices to improve project based soft skills. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 201-213. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v5nS1.1348

Kraus, S., Sycara, K., & Evenchik, A. (1998). Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation. Artificial Intelligence, 104(1-2), 1-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(98)00078-2

Labolo, M. (2013). Characteristic of Weber Bureucracy and Its Relevance in Indonesia. Asian Social Science, 9(2), 163-169.

Manan, B. (2001). Welcoming the dawn of Regional Autonomy. Faculty of Law UII Yogyakarta.

Marbun, S. F., & SH, M. (2018). Penerapan Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik (AUPB) Dalam Peraturan Menteri Energi Dan Sumber Daya Mineral Nomor 17 Tahun 2012 Tentang Penetapan Kawasan Bentang Alam Karst.

Maskin, E., & Sjöström, T. (2002). Implementation theory. Handbook of social Choice and Welfare, 1, 237-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0110(02)80009-1

Matei, L., Matei, A., & Lazar, C. G. (2016). Public service performance and good administration. Socio economic empirical evaluations. Procedia Economics and Finance, 39, 335-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30332-X

McAuley, L., Tugwell, P., & Moher, D. (2000). Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses?. The Lancet, 356(9237), 1228-1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02786-0

Nurcholis, H. (2005). Theory and Practice of Governance and Regional Autonomy. PT Grasindo, Jakarta.

Ridwan, H. R., Despan Heryansyah, S. H. I., & Pratiwi, D. K. (2018). Perluasan Kompetensi Absolut Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 25(2), 339-358.

Ridwan, J., & Sodik, A. (2009). Hukum administrasi Negara dan kebijakan pelayanan publik. Nuansa Cendekia.

Silalahi, U. (2006). Metode penelitian sosial.

Vavreniuk, S. A., Nepomnyashchyy, O. M., Marusheva, O. A., Lahunova, I. A., & Shostak, S. M. (2021). Mechanisms of public administration in post-soviet societies. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S2), 354-365. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v5nS2.1358

Yudoyono, B. (2001). Desentralisasi Dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Aparatur Pemerintah Daerah Dan Anggota DPRD. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.