Psychological and pedagogical conditions of integration of immigrants into the German society

Natalja Krutova-Soliman; Nadezhda M. Romanenko; Ekaterina E. Shishlova

doi:10.21744/lingcure.v5nS2.1338

Authors

Natalja Krutova-Soliman
k-soliman7322@tanu.pro
People's University of Frankfurt am Main, Frankkfurt am Main, Germany
Nadezhda M. Romanenko Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University), Moscow, Russian Federation
Ekaterina E. Shishlova Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University), Moscow, Russian Federation

Keywords:

cultural and linguistic environment, foreign language, immigrants, integration course, psychological and pedagogical conditions

Abstract

Among the new migration challenges of the modern world, perhaps the most acute is the issue of the integration of migrants. As a result of globalisation, events in the world are connected as communicating vessels and, the more unresolved problems in Africa or the Middle East, the stronger the desire of those in need of assistance to move to industrial countries with humane social welfare policies. In this regard, public interest in the problems of the European Union, including Germany, related to the influx of refugees through the Balkan route at the turn of 2015, is holding. The purpose of this paper is to present the results of a study conducted with students of integration courses at the People's University of Frankfurt am Main (VHS Frankfurt am Main) in the period from 2017 to 2020, and to demonstrate specially created psychological and pedagogical conditions that contribute to the development of a higher and better level of ability to integrate immigrants into the cultural and linguistic environment of Germany during the acquisition of the German language.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Althaus, K., & Linie, I. (2019). German in everyday life and at work: Test booklet A1 with solutions. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Sprachen.

Aristova, N. (2016). Rethinking cultural identities in the context of globalization: linguistic landscape of Kazan, Russia, as an emerging global city. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 236, 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.12.056

Azimov, E. G. (2009). New dictionary of methodological terms and concepts (language teaching theory and practice). Moscow: IKAR.

Biletska, I. O., Paladieva, A. F., Avchinnikova, H. D., & Kazak, Y. Y. (2021). The use of modern technologies by foreign language teachers: developing digital skills. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S2), 16-27. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v5nS2.1327

Brockhaus, F. A. (1987). Enzyklopädie in 24 Bändern. Mannheim: F.A. Brockhaus.

Chomsky, N. O. (1972). Language and Thought. Moscow: Moscow University Press, 122 p.

Comenius, J. A. (1993). Great didactics (Didactica magna). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

Feldmeyer, A. (2014). Literacy for Newcomers.

Fröbel, F. (1947). The ball as the child's first toy, Froebel's theory of play. Weimar: Beltz.

Hantschel, H. (2009). Successful for the German test for immigrants A2-B1: test and exercise book with CD and solutions. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Sprachen.

Hayakawa, S., Costa, A., Foucart, A., & Keysar, B. (2016). Using a foreign language changes our choices. Trends in cognitive sciences, 20(11), 791-793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.08.004

Jiang, X., Deng, L., Zhu, Y., Ji, H., Tao, L., Liu, L., ... & Ji, W. (2020). Psychological crisis intervention during the outbreak period of new coronavirus pneumonia from experience in Shanghai. Psychiatry research, 286, 112903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112903

Kalender, S. (2016). Steps plus new 2, level A1/2: Teacher's manual with solutions. München: Hueber.

Kalender, S. (2017). Steps plus new 3, level A2/1: Teacher's manual with solutions: München: Hueber.

Khutorskoy, A. V. (2017). Methodological rationale for a competency-based approach to the design of education. Higher Education in Russia, 12, 85-91.

Klippert, H. (2016). Heterogeneity in the classroom. How teachers can deal with it effectively and in a time-saving manner. Weinheim und Basel: Beltz.

Kravchenko, L. I. (2016). The migration crisis in Europe.

Krutova-Soliman, N. (2009). Seminar for staff HSH Nordbank “Change-Management”. Hamburg: HSH Nordbank.

Krutova-Soliman, N. (2020). Some problems in teaching immigrants a foreign language of the host country integration (case of FRG). The World of Academia: Culture & Education, 2, 23-28.

Kübler-Ross, E. (1983). Interviews mit Sterbenden. Stuttgart: Verlag.

Kukona, A., Fang, S. Y., Aicher, K. A., Chen, H., & Magnuson, J. S. (2011). The time course of anticipatory constraint integration. Cognition, 119(1), 23-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.002

Lancaster, J. (1996). Improvements in education, history of British educational theory 1750. London: Routledge.

Lee, Y., & Lee, J. (2014). Enhancing pre-service teachers' self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration through lesson planning practice. Computers & Education, 73, 121-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.001

Leontiev, A. N. (1975). Activity. Consciousness. Personality.

Maslow, A. (2014). Motivation and personality. Reinbek: Rowohlt.

Meyer, H. (2007). What is good teaching? Berlin: Cornelsen.

Mikkonen, K., Elo, S., Kuivila, H. M., Tuomikoski, A. M., & Kääriäinen, M. (2016). Culturally and linguistically diverse healthcare students’ experiences of learning in a clinical environment: A systematic review of qualitative studies. International journal of nursing studies, 54, 173-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.06.004

Pestalozzi, J. H. (1975). Pestalozzi: Letter on Stans. Weinheim und Basel: Beltz.

Pozdeeva, S., & Obskov, A. (2015). Justification of the main pedagogical conditions of interactive teaching a foreign language in high school. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206, 166-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.047

Ritonga, M., Kustati, M., Budiarti, M., Lahmi, A., Asmara, M., Kurniawan, R., Putri, N., & Yenti, E. (2021). Arabic as foreign language learning in pandemic COVID-19 as perceived by students and teachers. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(1), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v5n1.726

Roche, J. (2003). Foreign language acquisition, foreign language didactics. Tübingen: Narr Franke Attempto Verlag.

Rousseau, J-J. (1963). Emile or about education. Stuttgart: Philipp.

Shaw, J. A., Applegate, B., Tanner, S., Perez, D., Rothe, E., Campo-Bowen, A. E., & Lahey, B. L. (1995). Psychological effects of Hurricane Andrew on an elementary school population. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 34(9), 1185-1192. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199509000-00016

Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis). (2020). Population with a migrant background up 2.1% in 2019: lowest increase since 2011. Pressrealease No. 279.

Straubhaar, T. (2018). German must also be spoken at home!

Takeuchi, O. (2003). What can we learn from good foreign language learners? A qualitative study in the Japanese foreign language context. System, 31(3), 385-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00049-6

Unruh, T. (2011). Good teaching – practical guide. Tools of the trade for teaching professionals.

Valeeva, R. A., & Karimova, L. S. (2014). Research of Future Pedagogue-Psychologists’ Social Competency and Pedagogical Conditions of its Formation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 131, 40-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.076

Vygotsky, L. S. (1926). Educational psychology: short course.

Weinert, F. (2001). Comparative performance measurement in schools – a controversial matter of course. In Performance measurements in schools, 17-31). Weinheim und Basel: Beltz.

Zimnyaya, I. A. (1812). Competence and competency.