Metaphor as an object of the synergy paradigm study


  • Fakhraddin Abdulkerim Oglu Guliyev Azerbaijan High Millitary School named after Heydar Aliyev, Azerbaijan


information compression, innovativeness, metaphor, noninearity, prosedurality, synergetics, theory of knowledge


The article investigates the ontognoseological properties of metaphor from the point of view of the synergetic paradigm. By the principles of synergetic science, metaphor is considered as a nonlinear system category that performs a system-forming, heuristic, generalizing function. With the help of the principle of subordination, complex systems are described through a limited number of order parameters, as a result of which information is compressed without loss. The metaphor has its origins in the economy: as a method of abstraction, the transition from the infinite to the finite, and the reduction of lexical means. Metaphor is a way of transmitting an idea that has a methodological significance, i.e. one theoretical system is translated into another and one system is investigated through another, simpler system. Metaphor as a dynamic formation establishes connections between objects of different orders and processes in their development in space and time, which allows you to explore metaphors using the principles of synergetics.


Download data is not yet available.


Aristotle, D. (1998). Politics.

Bickerton, D. (1990). Introduction to linguistic theory. Theory of metaphor. Progress press, Moscow Russia.

Bunge, M. (1967). Action. In Scientific Research II (pp. 121-150). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (1999). Bridges to learning: Metaphors of teaching, learning and language. Researching and applying metaphor, 149, 176.

Dodd, S. D. (2002). Metaphors and meaning: A grounded cultural model of US

Dolinin, K. A. (1987). French stylistics.

Freidenberg, O. M. (1998). Myth and literature of antiquity. ?.: the Book-publishing firm «East literature» the Russian Academy of Science.

Gak, V. G. (1998). Language transformations. Moscow: Publishing house “Languages of Russian culture”.

Gentner, D., & Clement, C. (1988). Evidence for relational selectivity in the interpretation of analogy and metaphor. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 22, 307-358.

Gibbs Jr, R. W., Lima, P. L. C., & Francozo, E. (2004). Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of pragmatics, 36(7), 1189-1210.

Haken, G. (2003). Secrets of Nature. Synergetics: The Science of interaction. M.: Izhevsk.

Hegel, G. (2003). Encyclopedia of Philosophical Sciences. Philosophy of spirit. Mysl: Moscow, Russia.

Ilyenkov, E. V. (2014). The problem of the ideal in philosophy. Hegel and hermeneutics. The Book House «LIBROKOM.

Jackson, P. L., & Decety, J. (2004). Motor cognition: A new paradigm to study self–other interactions. Current opinion in Neurobiology, 14(2), 259-263.

Knyazeva, E. N. (2003). Transdisciplinarity of synergetics: consequences for education/EN Knyazev, SP Kurdyumov. Synergetic paradigm. Man and society in conditions of instability.

Kuliev, G. G. (1987). Metafora i nauchnoe poznanie [Metaphor and scientific knowledge]. Baku: Elm Publ.

Lindayani, L. R., Masri, F. A., Idul, R., & Sawali, L. (2018). A metaphorical analysis of Kabhanti Modero to show Munanese social relations. International journal of linguistics, literature and culture, 4(2), 72-80.

Losev, A. F. Filosofija imeni= Philosophy of name. Moscow: Moscow State University; 1990. 269 p.

Marin, A., Reimann, M., & Castaño, R. (2014). Metaphors and creativity: Direct, moderating, and mediating effects. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(2), 290-297.

McGuire, W. J. (1983). A contextualist theory of knowledge: Its implications for innovation and reform in psychological research. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 16, pp. 1-47). Academic Press.

Meynhardt, T., Chandler, J. D., & Strathoff, P. (2016). Systemic principles of value co-creation: Synergetics of value and service ecosystems. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2981-2989.

Neale, D. C., & Carroll, J. M. (1997). The role of metaphors in user interface design. In Handbook of human-computer interaction (pp. 441-462). North-Holland.

Ortega y Gasset, J. (1990). Dve velikie metafory [Two great metaphors]. Arutyunova, ND and Zhurinskaya, MA eds , 6881.

Ortega-i-Gasset, HJ (1991). Kul'tury philosophy. M.: Iskusstvo.

Philosophical encyclopedia. (1960). Soviet encyclopedia press. Part 1. Moscow, Russia.

Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary. (1968). Soviet Encyclopedia press. Moscow, Russia.

Raymer, M., & Camp, E. (2008). Metaphor. The Oxford Handbook of Philooiphy of Language. Oxford, UK, 845-863.

Reshetnikova, E. (2010). Metaphor in post-nonclassical cognition. Omsk State University press: Omsk, Russia.

Rotenberg, V. S. (1980). Slovo i obraz: problema konteksta [Word and image: the problem of context]. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of Philosophy], 4, 152-155.

Rotenberg, V. S., & Arshavsky, V. V. (1984). Search activity and adaptation. Science.

Sh, B. (1961). French stylistics/Sh. Bally. M.: Publishing house of foreign literature.

Shinotsuka, H., Yoshikawa, H., Murakami, R., Nakamura, K., Tanaka, H., & Yoshihara, K. (2020). Automated information compression of XPS spectrum using information criteria. Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 239, 146903.

Steen, G. (1999). Analyzing metaphor in literature: With examples from William Wordsworth's" I wandered lonely as a cloud". Poetics Today, 499-522.

Subiyanto, P. (2016). The impact of transposition on grammatical metaphor a study of translation from the perspective of SFL theory. International Journal of Linguistics, Language and Culture (IJLLC), 2(9), 97-101.

Wolff, J. G. (2006). Medical diagnosis as pattern recognition in a framework of information compression by multiple alignment, unification and search. Decision Support Systems, 42(2), 608-625.



How to Cite

Guliyev, F. A. O. (2021). Metaphor as an object of the synergy paradigm study. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 1-10.



Research Articles